What's stupid? It's a harmless colloquial phrase. There's absolutely no bad connotation unless you're searching for one.
Actually, I think it's the other way around. The vast majority are elected.
Lol not even close. 35 states elect the Secretary of State by popular vote. In only 9 states does the governor appoint the SoS. So no that's not "most."
Not necessarily. By your fuzzy math and your logic, there would be 62 Republican Senators. Senators are about an even split, so if 31 Governors are Republicans, then 62 Senators would be Republicans.Wouldn't you agree that more than likely the Secretary of State is going to be a part of the same party as the governor? For example, Tennessee is not electing a Republican governor and Democrat Secretary of State.
Not necessarily. By your fuzzy math and your logic, there would be 62 Republican Senators. Senators are about an even split, so if 31 Governors are Republicans, then 62 Senators would be Republicans.
Even if that is true, and I am too lazy to look it up this late, it would only stand to reason that if the governor was Republican, then more than likely the Secretary of State would be as well.
In 2016, eight secretaries of state will be chosen directly by voters. In virtually all of these races, the incumbent party is expected to face a competitive primary and/or a competitive general election contest.
Currently, the GOP holds 28 secretary of state offices, and the Democrats hold 22. (That includes the handful of states where the lieutenant governor handles the role of secretary of state.)
I feel better knowing that Republican Secretaries of State will be in every precinct and will go through every voting machine in 28 states. They will probably be the states that are heavily Republican anyway. It is the battleground states that I worry about.So there are 31 Republican governors and 28 Republican Secretaries of State. I was 3 off, but it essentially follows the formula I expected.
