The Supreme Court of the United States Thread





judges who keep having their rulings overturned/reversed should be removed....


ulie Kelly 🇺🇸
@julie_kelly2
·
By the way, Judge Boardman (Biden) had a bad day at SCOTUS yesterday. The court also reversed her in the LGBTQ+ case from Montgomery County--in that matter, since the plaintiffs were not pregnant illegals but US citizens, Boardman denied their request for a preliminary injunction requiring the school district to provide an opt-out to parents of grade schoolers (K-5) who didn't want their children reading LGBTQ propaganda in school.

She referred to the books as dealing with "family life and human sexuality" in denying relief to the parents.


Andrew Fisher
@acpandy
·
George Conway suggested the SCOTUS ruling is merely procedural and they plan to inundate the district courts and pursue a class action lawsuit.
 
Pack the courts, get just about whatever you want. They can wrest the law and their perception of the founding and original intent to find any way to justify anything. This is a terrible precedent. We are so ****ed as a nation.


"The real heart of the matter here is not the technical debate about historical analogies, but a core principle of constitutional government: the state must not be allowed to engage in large-scale systematic violations of the Constitution, especially when it comes to basic constitutional rights, like the birthright citizenship rights at issue in this case. And courts must be able to impose the remedies necessary to prevent that. That principle is vastly more important than any historical details about the exact nature of remedies available British courts in 1789."
Courts still CAN impose judgments. But they can only judge on cases for plaintiffs before them and in their jurisdiction. A single judge hearing a case brought by a limited number of plaintiffs within a limited region has absolutely no right to issue rulings that subject the entire nation and its population to their interpretation. That is the role of the Supreme Cout and the Supreme Court ALONE
 




judges who keep having their rulings overturned/reversed should be removed....


ulie Kelly 🇺🇸
@julie_kelly2
·
By the way, Judge Boardman (Biden) had a bad day at SCOTUS yesterday. The court also reversed her in the LGBTQ+ case from Montgomery County--in that matter, since the plaintiffs were not pregnant illegals but US citizens, Boardman denied their request for a preliminary injunction requiring the school district to provide an opt-out to parents of grade schoolers (K-5) who didn't want their children reading LGBTQ propaganda in school.

She referred to the books as dealing with "family life and human sexuality" in denying relief to the parents.


Andrew Fisher
@acpandy
·
George Conway suggested the SCOTUS ruling is merely procedural and they plan to inundate the district courts and pursue a class action lawsuit.

Not sure they should be removed. Heck any judge is going to get overturned occasionally. But they SHOULD removed form the case before them when it comes back to them. IMHO
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol
I saw the the liberal are considering a class action lawsuit on behalf of unborn children to challenge the birthright citizenship. Do so would effectively end the legal abortion argument and when life begins, of the suit of allowed to be brought as a class action for unborn children.
 
Last edited:
I saw the the liberal are considering a class action lawsuit on behalf of unborn children to challenge the birthright citizenship. Do so would effectively end the legal abortion argument and when love begins, of the suit of allowed to be brought as a class action for unborn children
The love begins at first sight of a nipple.
 
Now, Sotomayor has to explain to Ketanji Brown that Trump’s specific plans are not before the Court and that her decision is supposed to be based on the legality, not her personal approval. From her past comments, she may not understand the difference.

1752069936022.png
 
Another decision 8-1 about whether the administration has the right to restructure the federal workforce per Trump's executive order.

UPDATE: this decision simply lifted a lower court judge's order.

We now have a court breakdown like this:

3 Conservatives
3 Conservative to slightly moderates
2 Liberals
1 DEI

Jackson seems to be proving weekly she has very little business being a member of SCOTUS.
 
Last edited:
Another decision 8-1 about whether the administration has the right to restructure the federal workforce per Trump's executive order.

UPDATE: this decision simply lifted a lower court judge's order.

We now have a court breakdown like this:

3 Conservatives
3 Conservative to slightly moderates
2 Liberals
1 DEI

Jackson seems to be proving weekly she has very little business being a member of SCOTUS.
Jackson is a testament. She will stand as a reminder for generations.
 
Another decision 8-1 about whether the administration has the right to restructure the federal workforce per Trump's executive order.

UPDATE: this decision simply lifted a lower court judge's order.

We now have a court breakdown like this:

3 Conservatives
3 Conservative to slightly moderates
2 Liberals
1 DEI

Jackson seems to be proving weekly she has very little business being a member of SCOTUS.
Jackson has very little business being anywhere near a courtroom in any capacity.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vol since 77
Aside from Jumanji Brown you got Tiffany Henyard, Shang Thao, Brian Williams, Erika Ballou, Cassandra Collier-Williams, Brandon Johnson, Letitia James, Khalid Kamau, Tania Fernandes Anderson, So ya McKnight, Donya Sartor, etc, etc, etc. It’s becoming an endless list of corruption and incompetence.
 
Advertisement

Back
Top