The Supreme Court of the United States Thread

[Sandman 423]

When somebody calls out the president for flip flopping while failing to acknowledge his choice does the same on the same issue. Come on, even you can see the relevance.

Sorry, I just expect more from you. It is an easy argument to make as to why you would flip flop on any given issue.

 

[GroverCleveland]

I comprehended your statement just fine.

Using an expression like ''a large portion'' on an issue that generally has two avenues is misleading and, frankly, asinine. it's about 65-35 in women. If Tennessee lost a game 65 to 35, would you say something as dense as ''well, we scored a good portion of the points in that game?''

No, you wouldn't... because that would be a very stupid thing to say.

It would be about as stupid as using it as an analogy. For one, you're comparing discrete numbers to a ratio. Now if one said of the points scored in the game, Tennessee scored a large portion, then the statement makes perfect sense because one is talking about the ratio of points scored.

So based on the analogy you use, no, you did not comprehend the statement. How old are you? 12?

 

[clarksvol00]

I have. I don't see the wiggle room for a federal ban that some are seeing.

I didn't see anything about it when I just skimmed the synopsis, just talk about the justification for overturning the constitutional right, but I'll take your word for it.

 

[VOLS INC.]

It probably is for his family

Savage

 

[DinkinFlicka]

It would be about as stupid as using it as an analogy. For one, you're comparing discrete numbers to a ratio. Now if one said of the points scored in the game, Tennessee scored a large portion, then the statement makes perfect sense because one is talking about the ratio of points scored.

So base on the analogy you use, no, you did not comprehend the statement. How old are you? 12?

One man's overwhelming majority versus one fool's "large portion.''

It's pretty simple that even a guy who married someone who considers it murder can get it.

 

[Orangeburst]

You're a rather big smart a$$ for someone spouting stupid opinions about a decision he hasn't read.

You cycled to the anger stage very quickly
Maybe acceptance won’t be for longing

 

[Sandman 423]

You are correct.

Between the heartland, the bible belt, and a few culturally static piss mounds, it looks like about half the states will ban abortions within the year.

Have you not considered that some "insert childish quip" states take it to far the other way within the year?

 

[GroverCleveland]

Same. My wife is not as passionate about this issue as I am. Where she does seem to get passionate is the abortions after the heartbeat starts.

In 2018 we both heard our oldest son’s heartbeat in the womb for the 1st time. We still talk about that to this day. That same heart is still beating strong!

We should be looking for ways to nurture our unborn, not end their lives.

We have a miracle granddaughter. There were signs of a significant birth defect and talk of aborting. Thank God it was not done. She is one of the most beautiful girls in middle Georgia and absolutely lights up the room when she's around.

 

[GroverCleveland]

One man's overwhelming majority versus one fool's "large portion.''

It's pretty simple that even a guy who married someone who considers it murder can get it.

Got to love that keyboard bravery.

 

[82_VOL_83]

Materialism wins the day. People like to have their stuff.

This really makes no sense.

 

[VOLS INC.]

We have a miracle granddaughter. There were signs of a significant birth defect and talk of aborting. Thank God it was not done. She is one of the most beautiful girls in middle Georgia and absolutely lights up the room when she's around.

That’s awesome brother! Thanks for sharing.

 

[Bassmaster_Vol]

These are the people some of you are siding with. They don’t even know what a woman is…

 

[DinkinFlicka]

Have you not considered that some "insert childish quip" states take it to far the other way within the year?

Oh, I forgot. We're only allowed to **** on California and New York in the VNPF. Lol.

Depends. Texas has a few very large, liberal cities and their trigger bans fell off the news cycle within weeks. If they don't go too far, what's to stop Florida, or the upper midwest?

You can pretty much guarantee that the bible belt won't quit.

Which of the highly educated, culturally advanced Meccas of civilization do *you* think will fly too close to the pro-birth sun?

 

[hog88]

Before they could tell their staunchly anti abortion constituents that they were fighting the good fight. Now they lose their female base that was not strictly anti abortion. Thomas declaring war on gay marriage creates more issues. This was a great day for democrats.

Channeling your inner LG?

It all depends on how the Rs handle it.

 

[ClearwaterVol]

Sorry, I just expect more from you. It is an easy argument to make as to why you would flip flop on any given issue.

I don't generally call people out for changing positions. There are a multitude of reasons for doing so. Some nefarious and some valid. But when somebody acts as though it is big deal it seems fair to point out that changing positions is not a D or R thing.

 

[DinkinFlicka]

This really makes no sense.

The economy is always the most important because 99% of what we define as success is connected to net worth.

 

[Carl Pickens]

I don’t necessarily agree with abortion, but it doesn’t make much sense to me to overturn R v W.
It just seems like another move designed to instigate discourse

 

[ClearwaterVol]

You cycled to the anger stage very quickly
Maybe acceptance won’t be for longing

I don't know what you're talking about.

 

[whodeycin85]

I missed where this SCOTUS decision bans abortion? Don't like your states laws...move.

 

[luthervol]

Fair question. She is not where I am with regards to the states' rights, constitutional aspect. It is really simple: she believes it to be murder although I do think she is less forthright when it comes to things like rape, etc., although I cannot say for sure. Nothing more complicated than that. I cannot expound on what she thinks with regards to your question.

Understandable. If I viewed it as murder, I would be ecstatic also.
Kind of like people who view contraception as murder should be ecstatic with anti-contraception rulings.

 

[ClearwaterVol]

Channeling your inner LG?

It all depends on how the Rs handle it.

They seem to be full bore with outlawing abortion everywhere they can with the trigger laws and such. Make no mistake, there will be backlash.

 

[Carl Pickens]

I don't generally call people out for changing positions. There are a multitude of reasons for doing so. Some nefarious and some valid. But when somebody acts as though it is big deal it seems fair to point out that changing positions is not a D or R thing.

I’ve changed my stance on issues over the years as I’ve gained more understanding. As long as a person can explain why they changed positions, it’s not a big deal to me. If they’re just pandering then they’re just a dope

 

[VOLS INC.]

These are the people some of you are siding with. They don’t even know what a woman is…

Women and people who can get pregnant.

Ladies and gentlemen…. I present to you The Left.

 

[DinkinFlicka]

Got to love that keyboard bravery.

Not sure you can expect civility when you open discourse with a critique of something as fundamental as reading comprehension. Um, get bent?

 

[82_VOL_83]

The economy is always the most important because 99% of what we define as success is connected to net worth.

Yes, and RvW in some respects guaranteed abortions to be legal. The two don't equate and making a statement that one will override the other in the manner you did just doesn't make sense. Please say what you mean and don't beat around the bush.