It’s exactly how Notre Dame, Ohio State, and Michigan won most of their NCs back in the day. The SEC often had 3 or 4 better teams end of season but those guys played one tough game each year, most often against each other and would take home the NC by sportswriters vote. Stankey got suckered and has produced a great SEC product but again has set the SEC up to chew themselves up before playoff selection time and the favored Big10 arrive relatively pristine.
Agreed, let’s expel Texas, Texas A&M, Oklahoma, MissouriIf true, then won't the SEC be obviously dominant in the playoffs?
I agree that the SEC is stronger from top to bottom, but the other conference champions, such as Ohio State, are good and capable of winning it all, as we saw last year.
Maybe going to a mega-conference with all the big time programs is the answer. I kinda think so.
Agree.This is what all the weaker conferences have lobbied for all along. So they have a better chance. That's why the 9 conference game model is another bad look
Agreed. The SEC as it stands now, has Texas, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, LSU, Auburn, Tennessee, Oklahoma, who have all won NCs in the last 30 years. That's 8, half of the conference. The B10 by comparison, has Ohio State, Michigan, Nebraska, and USC. Four of their 18 teams. The Big 10 is loaded with cupcake programs, so an Ohio State or Michigan may only have to play two tough conference games a year, while a Tennessee, who has one of the weaker SEC schedules, has to play Florida, Alabama, Georgia, and Oklahoma all in the same year.This is also why North Carolina and Virginia are locks, if they want it, in the next round of expansion. The league has enough top shelf programs.
The other conferences weak schedule negates much of the strength advantage.If true, then won't the SEC be obviously dominant in the playoffs?
I agree that the SEC is stronger from top to bottom, but the other conference champions, such as Ohio State, are good and capable of winning it all, as we saw last year.
Maybe going to a mega-conference with all the big time programs is the answer. I kinda think so.
I love the 9 game format. I want to see good games every week.
The SEC has always beat up itself, resulting in lower rankings. But the SEC in general plays higher quality opponents but they consider a loss is a loss but not all losses are equal. Vanderbilt, usually the doormat of the SEC, who wants to play them this year? Not a gimme this year. Overall quality of the SEC is better, probably because of NIL. Thing I don't like is those that have the most money will get the best players. However, NIL has ruined the bowl games with best players opting out of playing in the bowl games. I fully understand about not wanting to get hurt, however, it's me, me, me, not team anymore.I've always said that having all of these teams in the same conference would lead to the cannibalization of itself.
Exactly. We just came off a devastating 2nd loss of the year, but still alive. We travel to Kentucky this weekend for a game that would only be about pride in the past.This is my take. We are now in the NFL model. We are getting a 16 team playoff next year. The days of undefeated national champions are over. Once college football fans adjust, it will be better for the sport.
It's no longer "can you get to a NY6 bowl" it is going to be "can you get to the playoffs" in terms of achieving goals. Much like what the NCAAT has become.