The Russia Hoax: The Illicit Scheme to Clear Hillary Clinton and Frame Donald Trump

[sonofUT62]

What are you gonna say Obama is a murderer now? Anything to distract from the protection of pedos

He’s not been known to commit murder domestically.

 

[K-town Vol Fan]

Take a hike in the smoky mountains & get lost & take your BS w/you.
You're a clown hack.

At least my side isn't threatening to shut the government down to help protect pedos. Idk how you sleep at night

 

[volinbham]

At least my side isn't threatening to shut the government down to help protect pedos. Idk how you sleep at night

your side put out zero info on Epstein even though it had every opportunity

the R side has 1) sought to have the grand jury files from the Florida Epstein trial turned over (an Obama appointed judge denied the request) and 2) has scheduled depositions via the House with G Maxwell - which means your side can ask whatever they want of the one living person who knows the most about Epstein).

seems one side is working much harder to get some information into the light.

 

[Sandman 423]

At least my side isn't threatening to shut the government down to help protect pedos. Idk how you sleep at night

Are you listening to yourself?

 

[volinbham]

oof -

In Brutal Document Release, the Russia Hoax is Finally Exposed

Official claim that Putin "aspired" to help Trump was based on four pieces of evidence, all bogus, even "ridiculous," according to long-suppressed report just released by DNI Tulsi Gabbard

www.racket.news

The January 6, 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment concluding that Russian President Vladimir Putin “developed a clear preference” for Donald Trump and “aspired to help his chances of victory” is revealed in a report released this morning by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard to have been based on four pieces of evidence. One was the Steele Dossier. The surprise is that the other three were even less credible, each included over objections of the report’s CIA authors.

The first item was a “scant, unclear, and unverifiable fragment” of one sentence that the report’s five CIA authors read “five ways” and initially left out, only to have Director John Brennan order it back in. The second item was an email with “no date, no identified sender, no clear recipient, and no classification.” The third was supposedly backed by “liaison,” diplomatic, and press reporting, as well as signals intelligence (SIGINT), except the “SIGINT” didn’t mention Trump, the “liaison reporting” didn’t mention Trump and was from 2014, and the “diplomatic and media” reporting was a post-election review by a U.S. Ambassador citing a Russian pundit who said Putin and Trump should “work together like businessmen.” This was “evidence” that Putin “developed a clear preference” for Trump.


Suckers

 

[marcusluvsvols]

What does it take for Americans to actually see a Democrat in handcuffs getting "perp walked"?

-They falsified intelligence vs Trump

-they lied under oath to Congress regarding Trump and collusion

-they wiretapped and bugged Trumps HQ ( Watergate on steroids btw)

- they tried several times to assassinate Trump for Pete's sake

What does it actually take man? A scud missile into Mar a Lago? Video evidence of some weirdo tossing a grenade at him?
What does it actually take to see a Democrat get arrested? They put Republicans and supporters BOTH in prison. By the thousands. WTH???

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

 

[K-town Vol Fan]

What does it take for Americans to actually see a Democrat in handcuffs getting "perp walked"?

-They falsified intelligence vs Trump

-they lied under oath to Congress regarding Trump and collusion

-they wiretapped and bugged Trumps HQ ( Watergate on steroids btw)

- they tried several times to assassinate Trump for Pete's sake

What does it actually take man? A scud missile into Mar a Lago? Video evidence of some weirdo tossing a grenade at him?
What does it actually take to see a Democrat get arrested? They put Republicans and supporters BOTH in prison. By the thousands. WTH???

Yummy yummy red tears

 

[theFallGuy]

even though it did come out before (but got virtually no press) will our Trump is Putin's puppet brigrade finally admit that Russia did not try to help Trump win the 2016 election?

it stunk from the beginning and some receipts are coming out - doubt anything will happen but the signs were there from the beginning for those not blinded by TDS.

No they'll start with "yeah but......"

 

[volinbham]

No they'll start with "yeah but......"

I'd settle for an "I was wrong" but not holding my breath.

 

[Franklin Pierce]

Gabbard contended last week in a viral post on X that former President Barack Obama and key members of his national security team, including then-CIA Director John Brennan and then-DNI James Clapper, fabricated a narrative about Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election to "subvert" Trump’s presidency.


Gabbard released more than 100 declassified documents on the intelligence community’s assessment, both before and after the 2016 election, regarding the consensus on potential Russian influence.



"WikiLeaks actively sought, and played, a key role in the Russian influence campaign and very likely knew it was assisting a Russian intelligence influence effort," he continued, referring to the hacking of the Democratic National Committee’s emails during the presidential campaign.

DNI Gabbard claims ‘deep state actors’ didn’t want Trump-Russia information to 'see the light of day'

DNI Tulsi Gabbard tells 'Jesse Watters Primetime' about a new DOJ 'strike force' that will investigate the declassified documents she referred for potential criminal investigation.

www.foxnews.com

 

[theFallGuy]

Apologies if already posted but Tulsi lays it all out

 

[BernardKingGOAT]

oof -

In Brutal Document Release, the Russia Hoax is Finally Exposed

Official claim that Putin "aspired" to help Trump was based on four pieces of evidence, all bogus, even "ridiculous," according to long-suppressed report just released by DNI Tulsi Gabbard

www.racket.news

The January 6, 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment concluding that Russian President Vladimir Putin “developed a clear preference” for Donald Trump and “aspired to help his chances of victory” is revealed in a report released this morning by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard to have been based on four pieces of evidence. One was the Steele Dossier. The surprise is that the other three were even less credible, each included over objections of the report’s CIA authors.

The first item was a “scant, unclear, and unverifiable fragment” of one sentence that the report’s five CIA authors read “five ways” and initially left out, only to have Director John Brennan order it back in. The second item was an email with “no date, no identified sender, no clear recipient, and no classification.” The third was supposedly backed by “liaison,” diplomatic, and press reporting, as well as signals intelligence (SIGINT), except the “SIGINT” didn’t mention Trump, the “liaison reporting” didn’t mention Trump and was from 2014, and the “diplomatic and media” reporting was a post-election review by a U.S. Ambassador citing a Russian pundit who said Putin and Trump should “work together like businessmen.” This was “evidence” that Putin “developed a clear preference” for Trump.


Suckers

The Senate ruled in 2020 that Russia, did in fact, meddle in the 2020 election. It had nothing to do with Trump, except Russia meddled to help the victory. It was a bi-partisan decision. Trump stood up in front of God and the entire world in Helsinki in 2017 and defended Putin. Trump's.
words were, "I can't imagine why he (Putin) would do such a thing". It's well documented. Trying to rationalize and defend him is sort of like when the Borg declared, "Resistance is Futile!"

You're the SUCKER

 

[volinbham]

The Senate ruled in 2020 that Russia, did in fact, meddle in the 2020 election. It had nothing to do with Trump, except Russia meddled to help the victory. It was a bi-partisan decision. Trump stood up in front of God and the entire world in Helsinki in 2017 and defended Putin. Trump's.
words were, "I can't imagine why he (Putin) would do such a thing". It's well documented. Trying to rationalize and defend him is sort of like when the Borg declared, "Resistance is Futile!"

You're the SUCKER

link that they concluded Russia was trying to help Trump - because the intel not only isn't there, it is contradicted. everyone agrees Russia meddled - the narrative that they wanted Trump to win is not only unsupported there is evidence to the contrary.

I'm not surprised you still believe the lie

 

[BernardKingGOAT]

link that they concluded Russia was trying to help Trump - because the intel not only isn't there, it is contradicted. everyone agrees Russia meddled - the narrative that they wanted Trump to win is not only unsupported there is evidence to the contrary.

I'm not surprised you still believe the lie

BS. Who were they helping then? They weren't doing it for shats and grins. My Goodness. Putin has admitted he was "partial" towards Trump. There is NO evidence the GRU was meddling for anyone but Trump

 

[volinbham]

BS. Who were they helping then? They weren't doing it for shats and grins. My Goodness. Putin has admitted he was "partial" towards Trump. There is NO evidence the GRU was meddling for anyone but Trump

they were F'n with the US to try to get people to doubt our elections. intelligence reports contradict the "help Trump" narrative. some had already come out an now we can see more of it.

if you'll check the link I posted earlier you'll see what the "help Trump" narrative was based on it and it's all unfounded - the Steele dossier was the strongest piece of information and it had already been discredited.

like Trump or hate him you should be interested in what really happened

 

[BernardKingGOAT]

they were F'n with the US to try to get people to doubt our elections. intelligence reports contradict the "help Trump" narrative. some had already come out an now we can see more of it.

if you'll check the link I posted earlier you'll see what the "help Trump" narrative was based on it and it's all unfounded - the Steele dossier was the strongest piece of information and it had already been discredited.

like Trump or hate him you should be interested in what really happened

I know what really happened, Pard. Your link doesn't provide proof. It's a narrative that hasn't been adjudicated. What don't you get about Trump's declarations in Helsinki? Why would he defend him? He's continued to do so in an embarrassing manner in this Presidency. Damn, Trump has refused to say Putin started the war with Ukraine. Even worse, suggested Ukraine started the war. That's not a narrative. He's done it in front of God and the whole world in pressers and oval office Q&A LIVE

I am surprised you can't be objective regardless of your tribal instincts

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

 

[Sea Ray]

They meddled but it wasn't successful. They did NOT impact the election

 

[CobbVol]

 

[CobbVol]

The Senate ruled in 2020 that Russia, did in fact, meddle in the 2020 election. It had nothing to do with Trump, except Russia meddled to help the victory. It was a bi-partisan decision. Trump stood up in front of God and the entire world in Helsinki in 2017 and defended Putin. Trump's.
words were, "I can't imagine why he (Putin) would do such a thing". It's well documented. Trying to rationalize and defend him is sort of like when the Borg declared, "Resistance is Futile!"

You're the SUCKER

The Senate did because the Steele Dossier was included in the information sent to the IC. They knew it was flawed but Brennan overruled their concerns and included it and its lies in what they sent to the SIC. The dossier was not included in what information was sent to Congress. They are just a handful of reasons for this to occur and none are innocent.

 

[theFallGuy]

I know what really happened, Pard. Your link doesn't provide proof. It's a narrative that hasn't been adjudicated. What don't you get about Trump's declarations in Helsinki? Why would he defend him? He's continued to do so in an embarrassing manner in this Presidency. Damn, Trump has refused to say Putin started the war with Ukraine. Even worse, suggested Ukraine started the war. That's not a narrative. He's done it in front of God and the whole world in pressers and oval office Q&A LIVE

I am surprised you can't be objective regardless of your tribal instincts

it's hilarious watching some folks still tow the line while the boat is sinking. It's like watching the band still play on the titanic as it sank into the Atlantic.

 

[jvol1]

View attachment 757858

Is it really crying wolf when it comes from Tulsi gabbard?

Do you think trump wont follow through if this Epstein stuff isn't cast aside? The taco mantle will only last so long.

Crying wolf would be more like pointing out that the current world situation seems to be a perfect inverse of wwii. With the russians frittering away their strength on Germany's east while the us seems to have elected some sort of autocrat in trump reminiscent of hitler. Germans are sort of identified with wolves and the fact that the germans seem poised to benefit at the moment and have a reputation for engineering skills, which would include social engineering the current global political moment, clearly shows that germany is finally set to fulfill its dreams of (wolfish) world domination.

 

[hog88]

Is it really crying wolf when it comes from Tulsi gabbard?

Do you think trump wont follow through if this Epstein stuff isn't cast aside? The taco mantle will only last so long.

Crying wolf would be more like pointing out that the current world situation seems to be a perfect inverse of wwii. With the russians frittering away their strength on Germany's east while the us seems to have elected some sort of autocrat in trump reminiscent of hitler. Germans are sort of identified with wolves and the fact that the germans seem poised to benefit at the moment and have a reputation for engineering skills, which would include social engineering the current global political moment, clearly shows that germany is finally set to fulfill its dreams of (wolfish) world domination.

Yes, it's crying wolf. Since the civil war only one party has made it a practice of prosecuting political rivals while in power and it hasn't been the Republicans.