The results are in

#154
#154
Folks, let's not move the goal posts here.

The claim was she wasn't Native American. She proved that wrong. Now people want to say "wellllllll, she is, but..."

Whether she can get carded is another matter (my comments were tongue in cheek) but that's beyond the scope at the moment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Septic
#155
#155
Grand Vol said:
Folks, let's not move the goal posts here.

The claim was she wasn't Native American. She proved that wrong. Now people want to say "wellllllll, she is, but..."

Whether she can get carded is another matter (my comments were tongue in cheek) but that's beyond the scope at the moment.
Click to expand...

SHE is not native American.........someone in her lineage "possible" was. Goal posts are double anchored like at LSU.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tbwhhs, Matt2496, 0nelilreb and 2 others
#157
#157
Grand Vol said:
Folks, let's not move the goal posts here.

The claim was she wasn't Native American. She proved that wrong. Now people want to say "wellllllll, she is, but..."

Whether she can get carded is another matter (my comments were tongue in cheek) but that's beyond the scope at the moment.
Click to expand...
Shes not native american
 
  • Like
Reactions: Matt2496, T-TownVol, 0nelilreb and 1 other person
#160
#160
This whole thing reminds me of when some dude shoots up a place and his family is all like "but he is a good dad!"...
 
#162
#162
Boston Vol said:


“The analysis of Warren’s DNA was reportedly done by Carlos D. Bustamante, a Stanford University professor, and shows that she had a Native American in her family tree dating back six to 10 generations.”

1/512th Native American, congratulations senator Warren. Does she honestly believe this makes her look better?
Click to expand...

She's a complete idiot
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1972 Grad and Septic
#165
#165
Septic said:
On a scale of one to Brett Kavanaugh after a case of PBR, how mad are you that her DNA proves unequivocally that your opinion is wrong?
Click to expand...
It doesnt prove anything. The testing wasn't based on Native American DNA. Can you even prove that its her DNA that was submitted? She is genetically more related to a banana than an indian. I'd believe Dr.Ford before this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Obsessed
#166
#166
FLVOL_79 said:
It doesnt prove anything. The testing wasn't based on Native American DNA. Can you even prove that its her DNA that was submitted? She is genetically more related to a banana than an indian. I'd believe Dr.Ford before this.
Click to expand...

Was8361377.jpg
 
#168
#168
So the dims might be going with a 71 year old White woman as their front runner in 2020? I guess Hillarys 68 (69?) wasn't old enough??

The dim primary debates are gonna be flipping AWESOME!
 
  • Like
Reactions: NurseGoodVol
#169
#169
Septic said:
On a scale of one to Brett Kavanaugh after a case of PBR, how mad are you that her DNA proves unequivocally that your opinion is wrong?
Click to expand...
what is unequivocal about 6th to 10th generation? They don't know where she falls in that range. plenty of ambiguity there. also that 6th-10th range is within their margin of error. so again plenty of stuff to be equivocal about in that report.

I didn't know equivocal was actually a word, I thought it was one of those words that only means something in the negative ie: disgruntled. you can't be gruntled but you can be equivocal.

unless she is 1/16th (4th generation) she can't claim it to the government. and at least when I looked into it I could only claim to be part of a tribe if I knew the name of the relation, which if she had a test means she doesn't know.
 
#173
#173
LouderVol said:
what is unequivocal about 6th to 10th generation? They don't know where she falls in that range. plenty of ambiguity there. also that 6th-10th range is within their margin of error. so again plenty of stuff to be equivocal about in that report.

I didn't know equivocal was actually a word, I thought it was one of those words that only means something in the negative ie: disgruntled. you can't be gruntled but you can be equivocal.

unless she is 1/16th (4th generation) she can't claim it to the government. and at least when I looked into it I could only claim to be part of a tribe if I knew the name of the relation, which if she had a test means she doesn't know.
Click to expand...

You guys need to listen to @Grand Vol, her claim was that she had Indian ancestry. This is clearly the case and as I stated earlier, attempting to quantify that which only needs to be qualified makes you folks look silly.

stevie-wonder-deal-with-it.gif
 
#175
#175
Septic said:
You guys need to listen to @Grand Vol, her claim was that she had Indian ancestry. This is clearly the case and as I stated earlier attempting to quantify that which only needs to be qualified makes you folks look silly.

stevie-wonder-deal-with-it.gif
Click to expand...

What percentage ancestry do you need to claim that as your race? When she applied at Harvard it wasn’t saying she had ancestry, she applied as a minority. She lied.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ajvol01 and FLVOL_79
New Posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

Advertisement



Back
Top