The results are in

#252
#252
Septic said:
Probably, are you familiar with her politics? This isn't absurd to believe ..... at all. Politics isn't a zero sum game, the circumstances matter.
Click to expand...

I guess after you make close to a million dollars by lying about being a minority...and I’ll quote the great Killary,”at this point what difference does it make”.
 
#254
#254
Franklin Pierce said:
Two Professors Featured in Warren Campaign Video About Native American Ancestry Are Donors

Two of the professors featured in Sen. Elizabeth Warren's (D., Mass.) new campaign video about her Native American ancestry have also donated to the Massachusetts senator.

University of Texas-Austin Law School professor Jay Westbrook and Harvard Law School Professor Charles Fried both gave testimonials to Warren in the video and have donated $6,111 and $250 to her, respectively. Fried served as solicitor general under Republican President Ronald Reagan.

Warren released a video on Monday delving into her longtime claims of Native American ancestry and whether it had an effect on her hiring as a law professor at various schools in the 1980s and 1990s. A DNA test's analysis showed "strong evidence" she had a Native American ancestor around six to 10 generations back, which could make her as little as 1/1,024th Native American.

Professors Featured in Warren Campaign Video About Native American Ancestry Are Donors
Click to expand...

Which is why her handlers sent her to a "friendly" lab for the test
 
#256
#256
She’s just proved to anybody with common sense that’s she’s a blithering idiot. I was sitting in a restaurant in southern Tennessee when I read the first article. I told my friends sitting with me that every person in the restaurant has more Native American DNA than Pocahontas. And she honestly thinks this proves she’s a damn long lost Cherokee Chief.... blue font for the last sentence.
 
#257
#257
BACKFIRE: 2nd Correction Made On Elizabeth Warren DNA Test Story, Warren Gets Mocked
elizabeth_warren_1.jpg


The Boston Globe had to issue a second embarrassing correction to their story claiming that Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) is Native American, admitting that the newspaper made "a math error."
Buried at the very bottom of the report, the newspaper issued the following correction:
​
Due to a math error, a story about Elizabeth Warren misstated the ancestry percentage of a potential 6th to 10th generation relative. The generational range based on the ancestor that the report identified suggests she’s between 1/64th and 1/1,024th Native American.​
​
The embarrassing report from Annie Linskey even noted that the analysis of Warren's genetic ancestry was based not on Native American DNA, but on MEXICAN, PERUVIAN, and COLUMBIAN DNA.
 
#258
#258
Franklin Pierce said:
BACKFIRE: 2nd Correction Made On Elizabeth Warren DNA Test Story, Warren Gets Mocked
elizabeth_warren_1.jpg


The Boston Globe had to issue a second embarrassing correction to their story claiming that Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) is Native American, admitting that the newspaper made "a math error."
Buried at the very bottom of the report, the newspaper issued the following correction:
​
Due to a math error, a story about Elizabeth Warren misstated the ancestry percentage of a potential 6th to 10th generation relative. The generational range based on the ancestor that the report identified suggests she’s between 1/64th and 1/1,024th Native American.​
​
The embarrassing report from Annie Linskey even noted that the analysis of Warren's genetic ancestry was based not on Native American DNA, but on MEXICAN, PERUVIAN, and COLUMBIAN DNA.
Click to expand...

So she may be an illegal immigrant?
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols, NurseGoodVol, TN-POSSUM and 3 others
#259
#259
Franklin Pierce said:
BACKFIRE: 2nd Correction Made On Elizabeth Warren DNA Test Story, Warren Gets Mocked
elizabeth_warren_1.jpg


The Boston Globe had to issue a second embarrassing correction to their story claiming that Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) is Native American, admitting that the newspaper made "a math error."
Buried at the very bottom of the report, the newspaper issued the following correction:
​
Due to a math error, a story about Elizabeth Warren misstated the ancestry percentage of a potential 6th to 10th generation relative. The generational range based on the ancestor that the report identified suggests she’s between 1/64th and 1/1,024th Native American.​
​
The embarrassing report from Annie Linskey even noted that the analysis of Warren's genetic ancestry was based not on Native American DNA, but on MEXICAN, PERUVIAN, and COLUMBIAN DNA.
Click to expand...
So, one of her ancestors may have been Mayan.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Franklin Pierce
#260
#260
Franklin Pierce said:
BACKFIRE: 2nd Correction Made On Elizabeth Warren DNA Test Story, Warren Gets Mocked
elizabeth_warren_1.jpg


The Boston Globe had to issue a second embarrassing correction to their story claiming that Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) is Native American, admitting that the newspaper made "a math error."
Buried at the very bottom of the report, the newspaper issued the following correction:
​
Due to a math error, a story about Elizabeth Warren misstated the ancestry percentage of a potential 6th to 10th generation relative. The generational range based on the ancestor that the report identified suggests she’s between 1/64th and 1/1,024th Native American.​
​
The embarrassing report from Annie Linskey even noted that the analysis of Warren's genetic ancestry was based not on Native American DNA, but on MEXICAN, PERUVIAN, and COLUMBIAN DNA.
Click to expand...
Lulz. Wait until Trump gets ahold of this. It’s gonna be good.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TN-POSSUM, McDad, T-TownVol and 2 others
#265
#265
Franklin Pierce said:
BACKFIRE: 2nd Correction Made On Elizabeth Warren DNA Test Story, Warren Gets Mocked
elizabeth_warren_1.jpg


The Boston Globe had to issue a second embarrassing correction to their story claiming that Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) is Native American, admitting that the newspaper made "a math error."
Buried at the very bottom of the report, the newspaper issued the following correction:
​
Due to a math error, a story about Elizabeth Warren misstated the ancestry percentage of a potential 6th to 10th generation relative. The generational range based on the ancestor that the report identified suggests she’s between 1/64th and 1/1,024th Native American.​
​
The embarrassing report from Annie Linskey even noted that the analysis of Warren's genetic ancestry was based not on Native American DNA, but on MEXICAN, PERUVIAN, and COLUMBIAN DNA.
Click to expand...
Don't insult my people this way
 
#266
#266
Elizabeth-Warren-Morning-White-Dove-Getty-Flickr-640x480.jpg


Democrats on Monday reacted with dismay and disbelief to Sen. Elizabeth Warren’s releasejust three weeks before the midterm elections, of a DNA test showing she may have traces of Native American ancestry.

Jim Messina, Obama 2012 campaign manager, tweeted, “Argue the substance all you want, but why 22 days before a crucial election where we MUST win house and senate to save America, why did @SenWarren have to do her announcement now? Why can’t Dems ever stay focused???”

David Axelrod, former President Obama’s chief campaign strategist and White House adviser, wrote: “The risk I’m sure she considered? This elevates it.”

CNN contributor and political analyst Ana Navarro, a Republican who voted for Clinton in 2016, wondered why Warren did not wait until after the midterms, in order to keep the message focused.
​
 
  • Like
Reactions: TN-POSSUM, T-TownVol, SLICKYINC and 2 others
#270
#270
She should’ve kept this quite, how embarrassing for her and the Dims that defended her. The average American has more Native American dna than she does. Laughable
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeburst
#272
#272
"A DNA test is useless to determine tribal citizenship. Current DNA tests do not even distinguish whether a person's ancestors were indigenous to North or South America. Sovereign tribal nations set their own legal requirements for citizenship, and while DNA tests can be used to determine lineage, such as paternity to an individual, it is not evidence for tribal affiliation. Using a DNA test to lay claim to any connection to the Cherokee Nation or any tribal nation, even vaguely, is inappropriate and wrong. It makes a mockery out of DNA tests and its legitimate uses while also dishonoring legitimate tribal governments and their citizens, whose ancestors are well documented and whose heritage is prove. Senator Warren is undermining tribal interests with her continued claims of tribal heritage."
- Cherokee Nation Secretary of State Chuck Hoskin, Jr.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols, LouderVol, Matt2496 and 7 others
New Posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

Advertisement



Back
Top