I admittedly do not know the whole story including background. It really doesn't matter to the point being made. Right wing extremist took armed control of a federal building and refused to leave for 41 days. Some people may feel they were justified, others do not. By nature protests will always have people who agree with the validity of the concerns and others who disagree.
Protests are legal, armed takeovers of federal buildings are not.
I think (but I'm no longer sure) that the whole basis of this discussion is that the current protests have been extreme or violent or unprecedentedly bad.
My point is merely that the protests by and large have been peaceful and lawful and that the right has little room to claim any kind of moral high ground. They have many incidents of their own where one, a few, or many have run afoul of the law, killed, insulted, bombed, ranted, radicalized, and offended.