NashVol11
Gloomed to Fail
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2009
- Messages
- 25,764
- Likes
- 9,784
I remember in this very thread when we got our first examples of transgender females running Girls HS Track.World records and D1 championships are not enough
I don't care what Huff said, but I do think it's telling that no trans woman has ever been one of the best several players in any sport across several decadesI remember in this very thread when we got our first examples of transgender females running Girls HS Track.
“Huff-Get back to me when they win”
(they won)
“Get back to me when they win something big”
(D1 title)
“Nah, get back to me when they’ve won Olympic Gold”
I pointed out that the existing rules seemed to have been working just fine and that no trans woman has been "dominating" any sport ever and look how quickly someone deflected again lol
I remember in this very thread when we got our first examples of transgender females running Girls HS Track.
“Huff-Get back to me when they win”
(they won)
“Get back to me when they win something big”
(D1 title)
“Nah, get back to me when they’ve won Olympic Gold”
Is it fair to say the xy genes give a significant advantage but not the only advantage? Or to rephrase, genes can take them so far but discipline, diet, training, etc contribute to how far they can get?I don't care what Huff said, but I do think it's telling that no trans woman has ever been one of the best several players in any sport across several decades
I think a lot of those advantages are negated by the process of complying with the rules around hormones, etc. that those leagues already had in place, as well as by the fact that there are very few trans people as opposed to people just switching genders for the hell of it as the right constantly implied. The idea that trans women are dominating or about to dominate women's sports was always a lie and certainly didn't necessitate government interventionIs it fair to say the xy genes give a significant advantage but not the only advantage? Or to rephrase, genes can take them so far but discipline, diet, training, etc contribute to how far they can get?
I understand what you said but you didn't really answer my question.I think a lot of those advantages are negated by the process of complying with the rules around hormones, etc. that those leagues already had in place, as well as by the fact that there are very few trans people as opposed to people just switching genders for the hell of it as the right constantly implied. The idea that trans women are dominating or about to dominate women's sports was always a lie and certainly didn't necessitate government intervention
I did. Genetics generally provide an advantage but by the time trans women take the required steps to actually compete, I don't think they have a significant advantage. But yes, there are factors other than genesI understand what you said but you didn't really answer my question.
Mind taking another swing at it?
I think a lot of those advantages are negated by the process of complying with the rules around hormones, etc. that those leagues already had in place, as well as by the fact that there are very few trans people as opposed to people just switching genders for the hell of it as the right constantly implied. The idea that trans women are dominating or about to dominate women's sports was always a lie and certainly didn't necessitate government intervention
I think a lot of those advantages are negated by the process of complying with the rules around hormones, etc. that those leagues already had in place, as well as by the fact that there are very few trans people as opposed to people just switching genders for the hell of it as the right constantly implied. The idea that trans women are dominating or about to dominate women's sports was always a lie and certainly didn't necessitate government intervention
I remember when my son was playing football in grade 4 or 5. We played a team who had a kid on the line who was twice the size of our biggest kid. He was the correct age but just huge. We were all concerned. The other team's coach had him play down to the normal sized kids level. Very good sportsmanship.I did. Genetics generally provide an advantage but by the time trans women take the required steps to actually compete, I don't think they have a significant advantage. But yes, there are factors other than genes
Because you're not looking at the Masters list:Why isn't Rachel on this list of world champion sprinters? What am I missing?
UCI Track Cycling World Championships – Women's sprint - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
Did you really get an ancestry dna test? I’ve always been interested in what mine would say.
Interesting tidbit, calling Thomas "elite" is still really contextual. Thomas' best 50fr is a 22.78. That's bested by the boys 11-12yo record of 21.50. Thomas' best 100 was tied by another 11-12 age bracket boy at 47.15. The best 200 by Thomas, a 1:39.31, managed to hold off the preteen boys but the 13-14yo record is 1:34.68.Or what? We have to identify all stars or hall of famers, or what?
If we can’t find specific examples from an insanely limited pool of people, who have massive limitations on their ability to compete if even allowed to do so at all, who have only been able to compete in many of these sports for a limited span of time
But if we can’t find someone who was specifically absolutely elite (Lia Thomas was elite and because she wasn’t the absolute best you discount her)…..so what?
What in your mind does any of this prove?