The Problems with Trans-ideology

#1,002
#1,002
DinkinFlicka said:
I meant to ask how many kids you had when you were preaching about the societal obligations of fathering children.
Click to expand...

1 so far. Hopefully a second within the next year or so. You should try it. I'd have far more respect for you if you dedicated your life to something beyond yourself. Rather than bragging about the number of drunk girls you take home. There's nothing impressive about giving into your most basic instincts. It would be like bragging about eating donuts all. Maybe it feels good in the moment, but it kills the soul in the long term.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
#1,005
#1,005
Vol8188 said:
1 so far. Hopefully a second within the next year or so. You should try it. I'd have far more respect for you if you dedicated your life to something beyond yourself. Rather than bragging about the number of drunk girls your take home. There's nothing impressive about giving into your most basic instincts. It would be like bragging about eating donuts all. Maybe it feels good in the moment, but it kills the soul in the long term.
Click to expand...

I've told you I do. My niece is 12 and I've already secured a significant portion of her college fund, and intend to buy her first car. I'm a huge part of her life. Your presumptions undo you.

I've also been seeing the same person for a hot minute. I'm thinking there's a long future there, but I know neither of us want children. Nothing wrong with waiting until your thirties to settle down.

Congrats on your budding family! You can keep your respect though. I'm not here to earn anyone's respect.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols and Vol8188
#1,013
#1,013
Gandalf said:
Good God, do none of these idiots know who actually buys their products? how on earth could this help JD bring in more customers? It DOESNT! it will lose them customers. That means that some group that has infiltrated the corp org is using it to promote their agenda over any concern for the people who actually own the company.
Click to expand...

Except that some, perhaps all, of the globes largest investor groups are and will prop up DEI, ESG, BLM Marxisms with your portfolio. How many JD drinkers are tuned in politically to this, understand it in the larger picture, and will stop buying? These companies are well aware of the tiny LGBTWXYZ population, but are proceeding anyway. They have apparently weighed the risk and think they have sufficient backstop and protection. Has Disney slowed down producing garbage despite the stock carnage?

It has to be considered if they're all doing it, government, forums like WEF, and C-level ideologues are synched and societal wreckage is the goal in order to change the society. These things are not happening in a vacuum.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols
#1,018
#1,018
turbovol said:
Nobody becomes a trans because of a "feeling" or a "movement." That is nonsense. We're talking about "gender dysphoria," which is defined as
"a sense of unease that a person may have because of a mismatch between their biological sex and their gender identity. This sense of unease or dissatisfaction may be so intense it can lead to depression and anxiety and have a harmful impact on daily life."

It is, by all accounts, a very serious thing--leading, as it reads above, to depression, unhappiness, etc. Nobody decides to switch genders on a whim.

In the old-school past, anybody with confused gender feelings would get the message, "just buck up and and stop nancying around." Now, like it or not, society is oriented toward giving individuals the freedom to seek their happiness. Gays have been around since the beginning of time--but they were in the closet for decades and lived very unhappy lives until the gay rights movement came along. I don't have a problem with it.

The trans phenomenon is more complex, partly if not mostly because most people with gender dysphoria don't make the full and complete transition to the opposite sex, which means surgery. Most are somewhere in between. Some take hormones, some just dress and identifty and live as transmen or transwomen. I've actually had work contact with two trans people--one fully transitioned from man to woman, with surgery and the whole bit. The other has not, as far as I know. He's a stocky individual--longtime male--who now just dresses and identifies as a woman--and it's a little odd to look at him, a burly former man dressed as woman. She might take hormones, but I don't think has had any surgery. Whatevs.

If someone is uncomfortable with their gender or sex and wants to identify differently, go for it--whatever makes you happy. I don't have a problem with it. That said, I do draw the line at athletic competition--and of course there was this huge controversy last year when a male swimmer at Penn became a transwoman--Lia Thomas-- was allowed to compete in female events by her university and by the NCAA--which had weak rules on the topic--and suddenly dominated her events AND went on to win a national title in one event. She had taken a hormone (testosterone) suppressant for a year and half--but the NCAA didn't have a rule on how low your testosterone level needed to be to compete in female events, only that you be on a hormone suppressant for at least a year. But that was the extent of it.

And it really became, for her defenders, including Penn, all about being "inclusive" and not discriminating against her desire to compete--even though in allowing her to compete Penn and the NCAA were discriminating against ALL the regular female swimmers in America. It was a big controversy in the collegiate swimming community. Nobody who's been through puberty as a male should be allowed to compete in female sporting events, IMO--and I think there is a big consensus on that point. think it will be harder for transwomen to compete in female athletic competitions going forward. The UK has just mandated a new "open" category encompassing men and transwomen, with strictly biological females competiting in women's events--and that seems fair. I think major sports bodies in all sports will tighten requirements for trans-women--as they should.

i also trend a little conservative in that I don't think we should be encouraging kids to question or think about their gender identity until they're at an age when they can do so themselves. I think conservatives have developed this fear that kids are being encouraged to be gay or trans. I don't think that's the case at all. If someone is uncomfortable in their skin, in their biological identity, they'll come to realize it at some point themselves--and that's the way it should be.

We should all be tolerant. Most everyone in the world is different in one way or the other. A lot of people don't get around the country or the world enough to realize that.
Click to expand...

All well and good but I draw the line at children. Sports? - yeah, no reason women should be brutalized by she-males but takes a backseat to transing children.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols
#1,023
#1,023
The feminist movement has hit a point of reality.
When you claim there are no differences in genders, this is what you get. They try to emasculate men and masculate women.
Regardless of Bobby Riggs loss, he was generally correct.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NCFisher and SpaceCoastVol
#1,025
#1,025
Orangeburst said:
The feminist movement has hit a point of reality.
When you claim there are no differences in genders, this is what you get. They try to emasculate men and masculate women.
Regardless of Bobby Riggs loss, he was generally correct.
Click to expand...

Riggs threw the match.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top