The Problems with Trans-ideology

#1,328
#1,328
volfanhill said:
What in the world


Click to expand...


I am morbidly curious about the type of person who would laugh at this segment. What are they like in their normal lives? Do they laugh at all unfunny jokes, or just tran-related unfunny jokes? Would they also laugh at actual comedy presented by a real comedian? So many questions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolStrom, StarRaider and davethevol
#1,335
#1,335
Orangeburst said:
It is a Human Right

UN report calls for decriminalization of all sexual activity, including between adults and children
Click to expand...
With respect to the enforcement of criminal law, any prescribed minimum age of consent to sex must be applied in a non-discriminatory manner. Enforcement may not be linked to the sex/gender of participants or age of consent to marriage. Moreover, sexual conduct involving persons below the domestically prescribed minimum age of consent to sex may be consensual, in fact, if not in law. In this context, the enforcement of criminal law should reflect the rights and capacity of persons under 18 years of age to make decisions about engaging in consensual sexual conduct and their right to be heard in matters concerning them.

1681749098102.gif

@allvol123 check this out ^
 
Last edited:
#1,345
#1,345
kiddiedoc said:
A lot of people wouldn't have been for a lot of things just a few years back. Yet, here we are.

That's why it is so important to take a stand now and stop giving ground.

Leave kids alone.
Click to expand...
I am 100% in agreement with you that minor children cannot consent to “gender affirming care”. Even with a note from their mother. (Or if WA & CA get their way - without the note)

There is absolutely no way a minor child can consent to sexual activity with an adult, either. Even with a note from their mother.

I have a difficult time understanding the difference between a minor providing consent for “sexual activity” and a minor providing consent for “sexual re-assignment”.
 
#1,346
#1,346
85SugarVol said:
He wouldn’t be in favor of it either. He’s been pretty clear on that.
Click to expand...
I'm sure he feels that way now. Just a scant few years ago the thought of doing life changing surgery to minors was looked at as being radical sickness. Now you have SNL championing cutting minors genitalia off and treating them with hormones. The line of acceptance is constantly moving. It's already happening with pedophilia. I'm skeptical that Dinks line in the sand is all that firm over time, especially several years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OrangeBoro
#1,347
#1,347
InVOLuntary said:
I'm sure he feels that way now. Just a scant few years ago the thought of doing life changing surgery to minors was looked at as being radical sickness. Now you have SNL championing cutting minors genitalia off and treating them with hormones. The line of acceptance is constantly moving. It's already happening with pedophilia. I'm skeptical that Dinks line in the sand is all that firm over time, especially several years.
Click to expand...

I don't give a damn about your skepticism, honestly. I know what I believe, and I've been pretty consistent in my beliefs for as long as I first held them.

If you or anyone else seriously thinks, given my record of consistency on here, that I would make excuses for sexual proclivities towards kids just for the sake of some ****ed up rendition of herd virtue signaling , then your ancestors didn't quite crawl all the way out of the primordial pool. Defending pedophilia is hardly any better than pedophilia itself.

You're just engaging in a slippery slope. I dn't let SNL give me any sort of barometric reading of whatever the socially acceptable norm is. You guys walk on eggshells. Not me. Don't assume that someone will eventually accept pedophilia or even ephebophilia (which has been defended here more than once by social ''conservatives'') just because they aren't as blatantly homophobic as yourself. It's a slippery slope of projection as well as a low IQ play.
 
#1,350
#1,350
DinkinFlicka said:
I don't give a damn about your skepticism, honestly. I know what I believe, and I've been pretty consistent in my beliefs for as long as I first held them.

If you or anyone else seriously thinks, given my record of consistency on here, that I would make excuses for sexual proclivities towards kids just for the sake of some ****ed up rendition of herd virtue signaling , then your ancestors didn't quite crawl all the way out of the primordial pool. Defending pedophilia is hardly any better than pedophilia itself.

You're just engaging in a slippery slope. I dn't let SNL give me any sort of barometric reading of whatever the socially acceptable norm is. You guys walk on eggshells. Not me. Don't assume that someone will eventually accept pedophilia or even ephebophilia (which has been defended here more than once by social ''conservatives'') just because they aren't as blatantly homophobic as yourself. It's a slippery slope of projection as well as a low IQ play.
Click to expand...
LOL, I don't give a damn about your pathetic perverted life. You champion your sickness. IQ? That's all you got. Your brain function is on par with your hero Biden.

Let me let you in on a little secret, conservative really don't care what you or your perverted friends stick your privates in another's orifice or allow others to stick in your orifices. Just don't force3 your religion on me. And, keep your sick hands off kids. It ain't my side trying to cut off kid's privates, that'd be yours.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OrangeBoro
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top