Business
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2006
- Messages
- 7,210
- Likes
- 1
I've read most of the posts, and always find this argument to be compelling. For me, I will do everything in my power to send my children to private school for one simple reason, and I don't know that the reason applies nationally, but it is certainly true in KY.
Everything from content to teaching methods in the KY public schools is nothing more than preparation for standardized testing.
I do realize the value of public education. I am afraid that the NEA in tandem with the government has dumbed down its efficacy and potential. Without major reform it is not going to get any better. It is not about the exceptionally bright or motivated student. It is about the average student that needs to learn how to learn. Practicing for standardized tests simply doesn't cut it in that situation.
private schools are not exempt. At the higher levels, the Private schools are maniacally focused on the SAT and they spend absurd hours prepping solely for that since it's such a big deal in the college acceptance process.Good point about the standardized testing....That is certainly becoming a major problem.. I'm not entirely sure, but are private schools exempt from taking any standardized testing???
private schools are not exempt. At the higher levels, the Private schools are maniacally focused on the SAT and they spend absurd hours prepping solely for that since it's such a big deal in the college acceptance process.
While I see Lex's point, all school system are slave to how they are evaluated. Prestigious school entrants are a huge deal for the private guys.
The Divinity School is certainly different than the other Grad Schools.. It is mixed between people pursuing academic stuff or clergy related work. Also, there are a number of students who are pursuing a second career that choose to go the Divinity School Route (since you can apply religion to just about everything).. Granted, at the law school, business school, etc you have your pompous @$$holes but for the most part you just have a lot of really overachievers....
Also, I kind of acquiesced and accepted the stereotype that many people have of Harvard. But in reality, it is incredibly diverse on many levels. In fact, they have a program where if your parents make less than $60,000 a year combined then you get free tuition, free housing, and I believe even a stipend.
so comparing Harvard with private high schools isn't really accurate. If I'm not mistaken, private high schools aren't offering any type of help to lower income families so that their kids can attend their school. Instead, more often than not, it is wealthy, suburban, white kids... and with that breeds a type of elitism.. That doesn't necesarilly mean that one thinks they are better than someone else, but might be as small as thinking that their education is better than someone else's... Which is what PeayGolf is saying without realizing that his argument is elitist haha.... If you presume that your education is better than someone else's then you have done so by putting forth your own definition of education... But to many people, knowing how to change a flat tire is just as important as reading Hemingway...
My point was that I went to a public school and was still able to attend a university that is PERCEIVED to be one of the better one's in the U.S. (although, like I already mention, it depends on how you define education... for instance, most people up here don't know the first damn thing to do if they have a flat tire, etc), which makes the whole notion that private schools offer a better education than public schools pretty void in my opinion....
My son never has to bring any home work because the teachers basically give them an assignment to do in class. If they get it done that is it, if they don't they have to take it home and turn it in the next day. The point here is that when I went to school we had our classwork we turned in at the end of the day and were then given an assignment to take home at least three or four days out of the week. It is a shame the way they have dumbed down our educational system.
some of the more delicious irony I've ever read on this board. Should I assume you were just being clever?Hey!!! Make school as simple as possible. Give the students grades so EVERYONE is happy. Maybe we should not have grades, do a pass/fail, so no one is dissapointed in the "letter" grade. We do not want to hurt little Johnny's ego.
You are right. This country and it's education system is a joke! What happened to "if your good, great...if you suck, sorry...."
some of the more delicious irony I've ever read on this board. Should I assume you were just being clever?
By the by, I went to one of the best graduate private business schools in the country, and grade inflation was an issue there, without a doubt.
I'll spill 2 more cents in this forum. The discussion yesterday seemed to veer into arguing over private schooling on the college level. I don't see much of a difference there. By that age, people have decided to value education and their success is hugely dependent on the individual. In other words, I don't immediately assume the Harvard attorney is any more effective than the UT attorney. I would say private schools have a more meaningful impact the younger the student is.
Local Board of Education members are chosen by election; State and U.S. Department of Education members are either elected or chosen by elected officials.
There was equal parts sarcasm and truth to my reply. You are right they are elected or appointed by someone who was. It just seems that many times they vote for things well intentioned but very detrimental. Either that or they have compromised themselves with special interest that has their own agenda.
Yes, your point is proven by the lack of funding the public education system gets.
Never said money was a cure all. Just that your idea that mayors and senators stopped caring is wrong. If they did, they would stop funding it altogether. Not continue to give it more and more money.
As for your "they don't have time" in your post above. I'll resist even going there. People have time for what they value.
I think they absolutely stopped caring. They continue to fund the program because the Constitution mandates it, but they stopped caring about the degradation some time ago.Never said money was a cure all. Just that your idea that mayors and senators stopped caring is wrong. If they did, they would stop funding it altogether. Not continue to give it more and more money.
As for your "they don't have time" in your post above. I'll resist even going there. People have time for what they value.
I think they absolutely stopped caring. They continue to fund the program because the Constitution mandates it, but they stopped caring about the degradation some time ago.
I would try my best to destroy the union and find truly qualified teachers. Nearly impossible task, but it has to start somewhere. Destruction of the union would be a great start.
