(CSpindizzy @ Jan 20 said:
"2006 Football Team: We have all the pieces in place to make a run at the SEC Championship."
Didn't the 2005 team have all the pieces in place to make a run at the National Title? Not being the eternal pessimist here but on paper things look good. But I want to see some open practices like LexVol has been calling for and I want to see the Spring game to see some changes in style and attitude. Can we loan BP to be the motivational speaker for a week?
We're not as bad as the naysayers would like for us to believe. We're not as far from having a championship team as last season's horrid results would indicate either.
Let's review some things:
People say, "Since 98 we've not won any championships." That statement, on its face appears daunting and menacing. But it's an extreme oversimplification.
1999 we're an upset at Arkansas from playing in the National Championship. We lose to Nebraska and finish #9. In 2001 we're an upset by LSU from playing in the NC again. We pound Michigan in the bowl and end up #4. We win 10 games in 03 and 04 ending up 15 and 13 respectively for those years. When you consider that we've ended 2 of the last 7 seasons top ten and 4 of the last 7 top 15 that is no small accomplishment. We were in position in 99 to play for the National Championship even though Florida was going to the SECCG and we were not. Had we beaten Arkansas we would have been in even without an SECCG. So, you see, the "We've not won any championships" argument rings hollow when placed against other criteria.
There are some very high profile programs that have done no more than us in that span of time. Florida St. Won the NC in 99 and has had only 1 top ten finish since. Nebraska has had only 2 top 10 finishes since 99 as has Florida. Auburn has had only 1 top 10 finish during that span.
Obviously, 2005 was Fulmer's worst coaching job. I don't think it's a matter of falling behind in scheme or system, but a matter of discipline and poor decision making as the CEO of the program.
I believe, had Ainge been left alone, not pulled in the 3rd series against UAB, but named the starter and left in, we'd have beaten UAB by 20 points and would have won 9 to 11 games. As it was, the shuffle destroyed the rhythm of the offense, wrecked Ainge's confidence, and the squabble amongst the players, in effect; the Ainge vs. Clausen debate was allowed to spill over into the team. This is a sign of a gross lack of discipline from the head coach. Any player who has the brass to question the authority of the head coach to the media has no respect for the head coach. That respect comes when a decision is made and held to. In an attempt to appease, possibly with the thought of Clausen 3 in the subconscious, too much pandering took place. You cannot molly caudle a football team. Decisions have to be made and stuck with. You have to stick with it for at least more than 2 series of downs.
We will not see that indecision with Cutcliffe calling the offensive shots. We will not see players complaining to the camera about playing time or any other decision the staff makes. Cut will bench 'em.
We have the talent, we now have the disciplinarian on the offensive side, and we have a head coach who has had a terrible learning experience in regards to how a lack of discipline can destroy the chemistry of a football team.
We will compete for championships this year and I'll be shocked if we don't win the SEC, bammers notwithstanding.