SeanJean
VFL, 24/7
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2009
- Messages
- 6,422
- Likes
- 1,771
They're balanced. That's the difference between them and the Bama teams of the past few years. Instead of relying on Releford or Lacey for 80% of their offensive production, they get scoring from a lot of sources. Today, it was Cooper, Tarrant, and Taylor. Randolph had an off-game, but he's usually their best player. Kessens and Hale are also capable of scoring in bunches (although Hale has struggled lately).
UT is similar to Bama's team last year. If Richardson doesn't go off, they're pretty much screwed. When Bama committed to shutting him down late in the second half, UT had no one else step up. That's where Punter and Hubbs need to step up.
Taylor is raw. Kessens definitely isn't. He needs to play stronger with the ball, but he's skilled.I agree for the most part, but Bama's strengths are 1-3. They have some size down low, but from what I saw, Taylor and Kessens are raw. Maybe I haven't seen enough of them. When you are balanced, I think that you can get inside scoring when their outside shots aren't falling. If a team had any size, they could play up on the outside shot and force them to win inside the arc. I just don't believe their inside game is strong enough if shots aren't falling. They have to rely on defense. JMO.
Glen's nephew. He's now on Scholarship. Good kid
Why not? Why is it OK to defend CCM but not CDT? Everyone is calling this a terrible loss, no its really not UT is a bad basketball team there are some OVC schools with more talent than Tennessee.