zeppelin128
Possibly a llama.
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2014
- Messages
- 23,291
- Likes
- 33,214
I also thought the fair catch was late as well. Targeting would have been upheld and it appears he knew it by his actions after. I am ecstatic and pleased with our warriors to this point. Evidently our guys came to play. I like it.That should have been a penalty on him for an illegal fair catch signal..... go look it up. you have to raise your hand above your head and go back and forth across your frame more than once or it is illegal.. The targeting would have stood up, but the interference and his penalty would have offset. and I think require another play punt. The dead ball foul would have to be enforced too. But for replay, who is supposed to look at all aspects of fouls on the play to not bring it up should be career limiting.
What is the rule stating that was an illegal fair catch? Only one I know is if the returner signals a fair catch then runs with the ball.
We don’t seem to handle blitzes well and that might be wellI was actually thinking this game is a trend of the last 3. min general it seems like we aren’t good on third down. my best guess is we just have too many dropped passes/inaccurate throws for longer distances. overall we have to be ranked really low in that area
You gotta move the ball or it doesn’t matter how much time you have. The announcer was annoying.That speed thing is BS. We are so fast we can't get our own players set. Slow the F down for once. I am all out of moral victories. Based on what we have seen, we can hang with Florida. If we could stop shooting off our own feet we could win.