Lots of people say this but where does everyone get this information?
Mullen and MSU consistently has top 20-30 talent...... And they are consistently a top 30 or so team..... Other than 2 years.
Sure Mullen is coaching up his players, but the talent he gets is equal to his success, the success does not outperform the talent.
We are just used to our talent being under coached and under preforming.
that's not entirely accurate. you go back and look at the recruiting the previous 3 years before Mullen got there, and the rankings the 3 years after he got there, and there was a roster flip...from top 40-50 talent, to top 30 talent. they mad a dip in to the top 20 twice. everything else is 20/lower, which is good for back half of the conf every year.
what i think you take from that is while he hasn't necessarily splashed as a recruiter, he did improve it.
and he took that improvement, and has parlayed it into the best run an MSU coach has had, at a time when the SEC W has been the best it's ever been.
Year national rnk sec rank
2006 40 10
2007 34 9
2008 53 10
2009* 18 8
2010 30 8
2011 41 11
2012 22 9
2013 24 10
2014 36 12
2015 18 8
2016 28 11
*DM 1st year. he took a team in 2014 to #1, and an Orange bowl with a roster made up of an average rank of 31 nationally, 11th in the conf.
in the 3 years prior to DM's arrival, MSU averaged 42nd nationally ranked class. since he's been there, he's improved that to 27th. 15 spots. that's good.
the hard part for him, is, at MSU, that gains you next to nothing in the conf, considering who he's recruiting against....3 years prior, conf recruiting rank, 10.2
since he's been hired...even with a 15 point improvement nationally....gets him to 9.6.
what i get from that...MSU has a lot to do with the recruiting limitations, his coaching has a lot to do with the results.
fwiw.