The Official 2025 March Madness Discussion Thread

That's not what I said. At all.
You said “Even if consensual I may still say he ought to be fired for poor judgment, depending on the facts”. Even if what was consensual? The sending pictures and videos of his genitals? The stalking?
 
Dude, read the room. Celebrate somewhere else, all you are going to do here is catch sh!t, all night. Unless you just wanna troll and piss people off, then carry on. I can handle it, but a lot on here can not


Apparently.

Now back to basketball ... as said by others here UF all tournament long was a very well coached second half team. Several remarkable comebacks, in a row. Surprised honestly that Houston couldn't close them out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WarDamnVols
I fully recognize the limits of the conclusion. But that's hardly in and of itself proof of any misconduct.
There is no need to discuss it then if you don’t understand what the language specifically said. It was a title 9 ruling by his own school with specific parameters. We also aren’t a court of law and can make reasonable inferences. So, back off the criticisms of the board.
 
You said “Even if consensual I may still say he ought to be fired for poor judgment, depending on the facts”. Even if what was consensual? The sending pictures and videos of his genitals? The stalking?


Depends on the circumstances. You are assuming certain ones, which may or may not be true.
 
There is no need to discuss it then if you don’t understand what the language specifically said. It was a title 9 ruling by his own school with specific parameters. We also aren’t a court of law and can make reasonable inferences. So, back off the criticisms of the board.
You’d think a lawyer would understand there should be different evidentiary standards between a criminal court and an internal investigation into a college basketball coach.
 
There is no need to discuss it then if you don’t understand what the language specifically said. It was a title 9 ruling by his own school with specific parameters. We also aren’t a court of law and can make reasonable inferences. So, back off the criticisms of the board.


Reasonable inferences... or speculation you'd like to be true so you can be dismissive of a rival's success?
 
Way to not answer my question. I’m asking YOU what YOU referred to as potentially being ok if it was consensual


You assume he sent pictures or stalked. What if it was less than that, a lot less ? Grounds for the wife to be mad. Sure. Fireable? I can't get there without knowing ANY actual details.
 
You’ve got minor in your name and Golden has an affinity for stalking women much younger than him. That’s what the other poster was referencing
Got it. Need to change my username before I post about a pedophile. Makes sense.
 
Reasonable inferences... or speculation you'd like to be true so you can be dismissive of a rival's success?
Why are you here. I feel like with your team just winning the freaking national championship you would have better things to do than sit here and argue with us about an issue we will never agree on. Go celebrate with your fellow Gator fans. Unless perhaps you are a middle aged man with no friends sitting on his phone posting here and still wondering why he's yet to find anything in life
 
  • Like
Reactions: minorvol
Why are you here. I feel like with your team just winning the freaking national championship you would have better things to do than sit here and argue with us about an issue we will never agree on. Go celebrate with your fellow Gator fans. Unless perhaps you are a middle aged man with no friends sitting on his phone posting here and still wondering why he's yet to find anything in life


Have a nice day.
 

VN Store



Back
Top