The Official “Regular Posters of the Basketball Forum” Thread

Anyone else find it interesting that Mashack & Milic are at the PIT, but none of Lanier, Ziegler or Gainey are?


 
Anyone else find it interesting that Mashack & Milic are at the PIT, but none of Lanier, Ziegler or Gainey are?


Isn’t this basically just a senior bowl? Considering Shack and Igor are meh, yeah I’d say they do need to show something.

Lanier doesn’t really need to play in that…does he? Projected draft pick…in his position, there’s no reason to hurt yourself

Gainey and Ziegler….cant answer that
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chaz-Vol
I mean Lanier is out of eligibility no matter what, even if the 5th year is granted. So, him not being there doesn’t seem to tell us much. I think we may be reading into it more than it really is. Trippie is probably right, the simple answer is usually the right one. Lanier doesn’t need to be there. ZZ and Gainey probably proved enough already to make a summer league team.
 
Isn’t this basically just a senior bowl? Considering Shack and Igor are meh, yeah I’d say they do need to show something.

Lanier doesn’t really need to play in that…does he? Projected draft pick…in his position, there’s no reason to hurt yourself

Gainey and Ziegler….cant answer that
Could mean nothing could mean something, I’m with you that Lanier showed enough so wouldn’t expect him to participate in it, so no shock there. Zeigler and Gainey not taking part was the more noteworthy part to me, neither of those guys obviously are projected draft picks.
 
I mean Lanier is out of eligibility no matter what, even if the 5th year is granted. So, him not being there doesn’t seem to tell us much. I think we may be reading into it more than it really is. Trippie is probably right, the simple answer is usually the right one. Lanier doesn’t need to be there. ZZ and Gainey probably proved enough already to make a summer league team.
I believe Lanier would also still have a year of eligibility. The covid year essentially doesn't exist as a year played on your NCAA sheet. Lanier has played 4 years that count against NCAA eligibility.
 
I believe Lanier would also still have a year of eligibility. The covid year essentially doesn't exist as a year played on your NCAA sheet. Lanier has played 4 years that count against NCAA eligibility.
He has played 5 years including the covid year. Not sure he'd get a 6th.
 
Yes, but the covid year is a non-year, aka it doesn't exist as a year played towards eligibility. He's played 4 years that count towards eligible years.
I'd think that opens the windows for a whole slew of kids, then. I don't believe that is being considered. The same way that the 5th year rule wipes out redshirts, I imagine it is designed to wipe out the covid year, as well. I can see where the argument can be had, but I'd venture to guess that the NCAA will argue you got to play in that season.
 
I'd think that opens the windows for a whole slew of kids, then. I don't believe that is being considered. The same way that the 5th year rule wipes out redshirts, I imagine it is designed to wipe out the covid year, as well. I can see where the argument can be had, but I'd venture to guess that the NCAA will argue you got to play in that season.
We'll see, I'd say the vast majority of players that schools would want back for a 5th year have already played some form of pro basketball around the world.
 
I think most folks are like me. I love and respect everything he has done, but I just feel like college sports is great because you get new players on a regular basis. Now, with 5 minutes to go in a tight game, any tears I had would be tears of joy if I saw him coming off the bench next year, despite any offseason sentiment to the contrary.
 

VN Store



Back
Top