The Minimum Wage: What's the Big Deal?

Probably depends on your starting point for analysis. Other start dates show a bigger deficit with inflation but none suggest it should be 15 or even 12 bucks/hour

In 1963, $1.25 or five 90% silver quarters is roughly .9 troy oz of silver.

2080 working hours in a year means that person on minimum wage earned $1.25 X 2080 = $2600/yr.

The ratio of the avg annual income to the minimum wage income for 1963 is $4396/$2600 = 1.69

Today, at roughly $15.36 per oz, minimum wage should be .9 troy silver X $15.36 = $13.83. Assuming 2080 hrs in a work year that comes to $13.83 X 2080 = $28,753.92/yr.

That same person today being paid in fiat trash dollars would make $7.25 X 2080 = $15,080/yr.

If the avg annual income today is $41,673, then the ration of avg annual income to minimum wage in fiat trash dollars is 2.76. Yet, if we paid in 90% silver like we did in 1963, the ratio is $41,673/$28,753.92 = 1.44, which is a close to the 1963 ratio.

Fiat money is robbing you...

At roughly 30 cents/gallon in 1963, one hour of labor at minimum wage bought you just over 4 gallons of gasoline, at $1.25/hr. Today, $7.25 will buy a little over 2 gallons. If you paid the minimum wage worker with .9 troy oz of silver at todays price, they could by 4 gallons of gas.

Fiat money is robbing you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
At roughly 30 cents/gallon in 1963, one hour of labor at minimum wage bought you just over 4 gallons of gasoline, at $1.25/hr. Today, $7.25 will buy a little over 2 gallons. If you paid the minimum wage worker with .9 troy oz of silver at todays price, they could by 4 gallons of gas.

Fiat money is robbing you.

How many people were buying gas in 1963 vs today? Supply and demand baby.
 
Somehow the liberal hellhole that is New York has a lower unemployment rate than conservative utopian Tennessee.
 
Somehow the liberal hellhole that is New York has a lower unemployment rate than conservative utopian Tennessee.

How's it compare to Texas?

There's more people in nyc than in the entire state of Tennessee. Apples and oranges.
 
Well, the "free market" part is actually pretty easy to figure.

I own my business, should my employees tell me what they should make. And further tell me what I should make?

I guarantee that anyone answering yes to that question has never been faced with meeting a payroll.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Of course not. However there has to be a "happy medium" somewhere. Employees shouldn't tell a business owner what to make or determine their own wages, but at the same time if a copmany's CEO who's earning 35 million per year cannot even provide benefits to his employees, that is gluttonous greed.

Have you stopped to think that these employees are being paid all they are worth? If they had the skills to command more money they would go elsewhere.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
My take on raising the FMW is that we would again be taking care of people that made huge mistakes in their lives and refuse to take measures to correct those mistakes on their own.

Dropping out of school, not getting a GED, not getting vocational training, getting an education in something that only qualifies them to teach. Why should the general public be saddled with supporting those people at a level they desire but are not willing to work for?

Free enterprise means that you will be rewarded based on what you are worth. If you don't like what you are worth then change it. Simple as that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Have you stopped to think that these employees are being paid all they are worth? If they had the skills to command more money they would go elsewhere.

There are plenty of businesses that already pay employees more than the mandated minimum wage. Why is this? It's the labor market. Companies that need and want to keep skilled workers offer better compensation and it has nothing to do with the government setting standards. All minimum wage does is make certain jobs illegal.
 
My take on raising the FMW is that we would again be taking care of people that made huge mistakes in their lives and refuse to take measures to correct those mistakes on their own.

Dropping out of school, not getting a GED, not getting vocational training, getting an education in something that only qualifies them to teach. Why should the general public be saddled with supporting those people at a level they desire but are not willing to work for?

Free enterprise means that you will be rewarded based on what you are worth. If you don't like what you are worth then change it. Simple as that.

doesn't fit the socialist mantra. you are only getting paid $7 an hour because someone is screwing you
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
Dems bring up the min wage every 4 years..... Again relying on the govt for your wages is a bad idea
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Minimum wage never produces advances for those who it is intended to help. It ALWAYS causes inflation in prices to compensate. And the inflation always hurts our seniors on fixed incomes with little opportunity for additional earnings.

But why would these politicians care about seniors? You can always neutralize that voting block with low education voters. That is the Democratic strategy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
I'm not sure why people (not on this board) don't understand that if minimum wage is increased, that prices will go up. There are very few, if any, companies out there that will absorb that loss. They will protect their bottom line. And they should, because that's how good companies operate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
I'm not sure why people (not on this board) don't understand that if minimum wage is increased, that prices will go up. There are very few, if any, companies out there that will absorb that loss. They will protect their bottom line. And they should, because that's how good companies operate.

Or prices go up, and people are laid off.

The cost is passed on. It just amazes me that people can not grasp this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
I'm not sure why people (not on this board) don't understand that if minimum wage is increased, that prices will go up. There are very few, if any, companies out there that will absorb that loss. They will protect their bottom line. And they should, because that's how good companies operate.

It's because those being pandered too are too stupid to either understand or care.
 
I'm not sure why people (not on this board) don't understand that if minimum wage is increased, that prices will go up. There are very few, if any, companies out there that will absorb that loss. They will protect their bottom line. And they should, because that's how good companies operate.

I would argue that minimum wage has lagged behind inflation and executive pay has far exceeded inflation. Those on the low end of the wage scale are paid less than they were 50 years ago and pay more on inflation and pay higher interest rates. Those on the top end are the first to receive and benefit from low interest rates and they command salaries well above their peers from 50 years ago.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
I would argue that minimum wage has lagged behind inflation and executive pay has far exceeded inflation. Those on the low end of the wage scale are paid less than they were 50 years ago and pay more on inflation and pay higher interest rates. Those on the top end are the first to receive and benefit from low interest rates and they command salaries well above their peers from 50 years ago.

What do you define as executive pay and why do you say its outpaced inflation?
 
Advertisement

Back
Top