VOLnMiami
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2008
- Messages
- 18,262
- Likes
- 10,204
He did nothing but people want to blame him for the demise of UT football...The man has been gone almost 10 years now but they STILL feel the need to blame him...He was only here one damn year...Get over it folks.
I'd definitely say fulmer isn't to blame but it was absolutely the right decision to replace him when we did. of our last 4 seasons under him were sub .500. That's after having a ton of time to establish himself and bring in his type of players. The game had passed him by. Could you imagine saban or urban Meyer having a 4 year span where they lost more games than they won? Me either. Stop defending his coaching record. It was good in the 90's. But fell considerable afterwards.
But it's definitely not his fault. Now...I think it's absolutely ridiculous to have allowed him to make this most recent hire. Hiring a football coach is absolutely the most important part of an ads job. And how in the world a guy that was fired a decade early for not being able to keep up with the game made sent to hand the keys to...I'll never understand.
I was pissed off about how he packed up his s*** and left in the middle of the night, but a part of me also understood.He did nothing but people want to blame him for the demise of UT football...The man has been gone almost 10 years now but they STILL feel the need to blame him...He was only here one damn year...Get over it folks.
When a coach wants to win at any legal means, he will take risks
For instance, Saban played the 2nd string QB last season against Clemson and they won
Pruitt should have played Keller more often; especially when it was obvious that JG wasn't getting it done
Pruitt did not want to bruise JG fragile ego so,he continued to,play him
Pruitt is NOT the coach to lead us to the promise land...... Does not really want to win
When a coach wants to win at any legal means, he will take risks
For instance, Saban played the 2nd string QB last season against Clemson and they won
Pruitt should have played Keller more often; especially when it was obvious that JG wasn't getting it done
Pruitt did not want to bruise JG fragile ego so,he continued to,play him
Pruitt is NOT the coach to lead us to the promise land...... Does not really want to win
They ended up with a better QB than him anyway. QB was not the issue.He basically got fired because Ainge didn't recover fast enough in 2005, maybe because he got adicted to the pain meds like millions of other Americans and because they whiffed on a QB to replace Ainge in 2008. You don't think a Taj Boyd led 2009-2011/2012 would have not won more games than the real teams did? LSU/Bama, Florida/Ohio State have a lot more advantages than we have in recruiting but honestly I don't think those guys would have multiple bad seasons like that becuase they would leave first instead of trying to fix it.
I really don't get this hatred of the Haslams.
1. The patriarch chose to attend UT, after playing high school ball in Florida and being recruited by Neyland. He played on the 1951 NC team. He has contributed more to the University of Tennessee than any other person. He served on the UT Board of Trustees for many years. (I could argue that since he was not reappointed to the board nearly 18 years ago, things have been going downhill.) The man very obviously and genuinely loves the University of Tennessee and he loves the Vols and wants what's best for everything UT. 2. The older son attended and graduated from UTK. He is also a heavy contributor, and the company that his father created and that he now leads is a major sponsor of UT athletics. 3. The younger son attended and graduated from Emory University (he originally wanted to enter the ministry and UT does not have a school of theology or divinity) but he is also a huge supporter and contributor and and frequently attends Tennessee games. I won't even begin to list all the things at UT bearing the family name.
So WHY do you think "the Haslams" want to destroy the football program? What would be the motive?
People need someone to blame. Haslams are the easiestSo it's been 60 hours since I posed the question below about "the Haslams" and not a single person has produced any motive of why the University's greatest benefactors would want to sink the football program, much less any proof. Conclusion: just a bunch of bloviating, mindlessly repeating nonsense read on message boards.
So it's been 60 hours since I posed the question below about "the Haslams" and not a single person has produced any motive of why the University's greatest benefactors would want to sink the football program, much less any proof. Conclusion: just a bunch of bloviating, mindlessly repeating nonsense read on message boards.
...Rather, "Big Jim" et al felt that given their level of $$ contribution and prestige they were not just fans, they were The Owners. And, as The Owners, they began to micromanage. UT Admin went along with it, hence a major contribution to the downward spiral.
"Big Jim" once stated publicly that he didn't want UT to be known as "a mercenary football school, like Alabama" but instead to be known as "an academic school that also plays football, like Virginia." Also, The Owners reportedly had a long time love of Schiano thus his attempted hire at UT -- and we all see what a great choice that was and how well it worked out for UT.
So it's been 60 hours since I posed the question below about "the Haslams" and not a single person has produced any motive of why the University's greatest benefactors would want to sink the football program, much less any proof. Conclusion: just a bunch of bloviating, mindlessly repeating nonsense read on message boards.
1. But what EVIDENCE is there that they began to micromanage or even interfere -- or is it just speculation?
2. If "Big Jim" said he wants UT to be known as "an academic school that also plays football, like Virginia," I'm very glad to hear that. That's the way this alum wants it.