The (many) indictments of Donald Trump

And Trump is a Russian spy…and Trump peed on the bed Obama slept in…and Trump said Neo-nazis are fine people…and so on. It cuts both ways BB.
What you are describing does not compare to the extensive coverage that birtherism and the 2020 Presidential Election fraud claims received. Those are more false equivalencies.

No ... It doesn't cut both ways either.
 
It is very rare for those media outlets to publish reports which are provably false. That is not the case with outlets such as Info Wars, The Gateway Pundit, and Leading Report ... whose entire purpose is to spread disinformation.

You should not need someone to explain the difference between The Washington Post and The Gateway Pundit to you.
No surprise in that you’re having to explain what propaganda is to someone who is gullible enough to drink the trump kool-aid.

Trump relies on this very demographic because he knows they won’t question anything he says or any bs propaganda from a right wing site.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BowlBrother85
No surprise in that you’re having to explain what propaganda is to someone who is gullible enough to drink the trump kool-aid.

Trump relies on this very demographic because he knows they won’t question anything he says or any bs propaganda from a right wing site.
Some of the false equivalencies drawn on here are incredible. There is no way that these people are rational thinking adults.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lostsheep
That is laughable
LOL.

That you think the Steele Dossier received comparable news coverage with Obama's birth certificate and the 2020 Presidential Election fraud claims (which Fox News paid $787 million to settle a defamation suit over), is typical right-wing lunacy and idiocy.

You people are unsophisticated, poorly read, irrational and void of reason. This is a redneck haven.
 
LOL.

That you think the Steele Dossier received comparable news coverage with Obama's birth certificate and the 2020 Presidential Election fraud claims (which Fox News paid $787 million to settle a defamation suit over), is typical right-wing lunacy and idiocy.

You people are unsophisticated, poorly read, irrational and void of reason. This is a redneck haven.

Laughable and not even worthy of debate
wtf do you think has been wall to wall coverage for 6 years. **** man
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
LOL.

That you think the Steele Dossier received comparable news coverage with Obama's birth certificate and the 2020 Presidential Election fraud claims (which Fox News paid $787 million to settle a defamation suit over), is typical right-wing lunacy and idiocy.

You people are unsophisticated, poorly read, irrational and void of reason. This is a redneck haven.

LOL, says the VN drunk .
 
LOL.

That you think the Steele Dossier received comparable news coverage with Obama's birth certificate and the 2020 Presidential Election fraud claims (which Fox News paid $787 million to settle a defamation suit over), is typical right-wing lunacy and idiocy.

You people are unsophisticated, poorly read, irrational and void of reason. This is a redneck haven.

1688686966501.gif
 
No surprise in that you’re having to explain what propaganda is to someone who is gullible enough to drink the trump kool-aid.

Trump relies on this very demographic because he knows they won’t question anything he says or any bs propaganda from a right wing site.
81M voted for a guy in basement. Kool-Aid is tasty when it’s stirred by a sweaty hand.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
Laughable and not even worthy of debate
wtf do you think has been wall to wall coverage for 6 years. **** man
I can tell you what had wall to wall coverage in 2011 and 2012 on Fox News ... Obama's place of birth.

I can tell you what had wall to wall coverage from November of 2020 until November of 2022 on Fox News ... bogus claims of fraud concerning the 2020 Presidential Election.

You are right. It's not worthy of debate. The average American could not tell you what was even in the Steele Dossier. Everyone is aware of Trump's bs fraud claims. That is the only damn thing Fox News would cover. Hence, the $787 million check to Dominion.
 
I can tell you what had wall to wall coverage in 2011 and 2012 on Fox News ... Obama's place of birth.

I can tell you what had wall to wall coverage from November of 2020 until November of 2022 on Fox News ... bogus claims of fraud concerning the 2020 Presidential Election.

You are right. It's not worthy of debate. The average American could not tell you what was even in the Steele Dossier. Everyone is aware of Trump's bs fraud claims. That is the only damn thing Fox News would cover. Hence, the $787 million check to Dominion.
Facebook population from 2011 845M (Birther) Facebook population in 2016 1.74B (Steele Dossier)

Double the population on the largest social media platform that saw a fabricated story. So yes literal wall to wall coverage of algorithm spikes with views and shares across a social media population greater than Fox viewership.

Remember, you said earlier “try being a little more open-minded”
 
Last edited:
81M voted for a guy in basement. Kool-Aid is tasty when it’s stirred by a sweaty hand.
If my hero got his a$$ handed to him in an election by a guy in a basement, I’d probably reevaluate my hero selection process. Just sayin.
 
If my hero got his a$$ handed to him in an election by a guy in a basement, I’d probably reevaluate my hero selection process. Just sayin.
Define heroes? One who denies a granddaughter or one who denies an election? Since we are doing self reflections.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
Define heroes? One who denies a granddaughter or one who denies an election? Since we are doing self reflections.
Haha.
Unlike you trump slurpers, I don’t spend my days defending and worshipping Biden.
Turn off Fox News, OAN, and newsmax and start thinking for yourself before you end up down in Guyana.
 
Haha.
Unlike you trump slurpers, I don’t spend my days defending and worshipping Biden.
Turn off Fox News, OAN, and newsmax and start thinking for yourself before you end up down in Guyana.
That’s the beauty…I am a free thinker. That’s why it’s concerning of the 81M basement votes. I could watch CNN and hear Russian Collusion, Mueller Report, 1st Impeachment on a call, 2nd Impeachment on inciting, Steele Dossier or maybe sprinkle in a reason for treason with files or nuclear codes. But I’m a free thinker, so I already knew it was bs before it was reported after the fact.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
I can tell you what had wall to wall coverage in 2011 and 2012 on Fox News ... Obama's place of birth.

I can tell you what had wall to wall coverage from November of 2020 until November of 2022 on Fox News ... bogus claims of fraud concerning the 2020 Presidential Election.

You are right. It's not worthy of debate. The average American could not tell you what was even in the Steele Dossier. Everyone is aware of Trump's bs fraud claims. That is the only damn thing Fox News would cover. Hence, the $787 million check to Dominion.
Horse ****. It wasn't anymore wall to wall on Fox than pee tapes, taxes, and collusion were on MSNBC
 
Horse ****. It wasn't anymore wall to wall on Fox than pee tapes, taxes, and collusion were on MSNBC
Collusion, sure ... but I was speaking specifically of the Steele Dossier.

The majority of the discussion involving the Mueller probe had nothing to do with the Steele Dossier. It more heavily pertained to provable events ... such as the hacking of the DNC by Russian operatives and the hacking of Hillary Clinton's/John Podesta's e-mail accounts, the wikiLeaks releases, the June 9, 2016 meeting at Trump Tower and the e-mail exchanges between Donald Trump Jr. and Rob Goldstone.

.. and are you really qualified to talk about what was discussed on MSNBC? I'm pretty certain that I tune into that network more than you do.
 
What you are describing does not compare to the extensive coverage that birtherism and the 2020 Presidential Election fraud claims received. Those are more false equivalencies.

No ... It doesn't cut both ways either.
Ok dude. We all know you’re so blinded that you’re as far from being objective as any “Trumper”.
 
Collusion, sure ... but I was speaking specifically of the Steele Dossier.

The majority of the discussion involving the Mueller probe had nothing to do with the Steele Dossier. It more heavily pertained to provable events ... such as the hacking of the DNC by Russian operatives and the hacking of Hillary Clinton's/John Podesta's e-mail accounts, the wikiLeaks releases, the June 9, 2016 meeting at Trump Tower and the e-mail exchanges between Donald Trump Jr. and Rob Goldstone.

.. and are you really qualified to talk about what was discussed on MSNBC? I'm pretty certain that I tune into that network more than you do.
So Fox was wall to wall. According to you. Are you qualified? I mean apparently you were watching not fox. How do you know? Good lord man you have lost your shat the last 24 months.
 
So Fox was wall to wall. According to you. Are you qualified? I mean apparently you were watching not fox. How do you know? Good lord man you have lost your shat the last 24 months.
He even included the birther issue As receiving more coverage
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
So Fox was wall to wall. According to you. Are you qualified? I mean apparently you were watching not fox. How do you know? Good lord man you have lost your shat the last 24 months.
In April, Fox News agreed to pay $787 million to Dominion, in order to settle a defamation lawsuit over 2020 Presidential Election lies that were spread on their shows.

I followed those proceedings pretty closely; not because I watch Fox News (they never covered that lawsuit at all), but rather because I do watch MSNBC and read media outlets such as The New York Times, Newsweek and Politico, who did cover it extensively.

So, yeah ... I'm qualified to discuss that civil suit, and the Fox News coverage of the 2020 Presidential Election.
 
That is ridiculous. There is ample evidence that Donald Trump has revealed classified information to people who did not have the clearance to be receiving it. This is not a media creation or a witch hunt by Democrats either. it's on an audio recording, which doesn't leave room for misinterpretation.

I don’t think you understand. If the President decides that it’s personal papers then he can show it to whoever he wants. He can say they are secret or whatever but they are not Presidential docs if he decides they are personal.

Now should he have to explain politically why he is showing these to people outside the government? I think so but it’s political not a legal matter per the ruling I referenced earlier.
 
Advertisement

Back
Top