My gut is that the biggest problem is not what happens on the court for 40 minutes, in of itself, but in what happens between each game.
We hav a young, still fresh out of D2 coach, with D2 ideas about strength and conditioning, playing in a league with SEC ideas about how you develop a team to win at the top of the women's basketball world. And instead of inheriting the best minds of the S&C world college sports has to offer, to help her out on these things -- exercise, nutrition, what to do and what not to do, etc. -- instead our S&C director is someone she worked with at Glenville, who had a single year at WVU before Kim brought him to Tennessee, so it seems like our S&C is very much so Mountain East Conference.
We had a self-admitted conditioning breakdown last season that lead to blowout losses... is it crazy to think that we're still experiencing the symptoms of D2 S&C at a major D1 school? That seeming effort issues from Zee and Coop ar a symptom of them managing to do what their bodies can do under the stress of coach demanding 30 minutes out of them every game in an energy-mandated system?
[I've talked about this before, so I apologize for rehashing, but the fact that she was open about S&C being a big problem for us validated my early season concerns about what happens behind the scenes]
I hope I'm wrong, because it's a dreadful diagnosis. If the way they practice and the way CKC and staff develop their bodies is flawed, then anything we change about the system game-to-game is just going to be a bandaid on a pretty serious issue. And if means that, even tho everything we do on the court when we're actually running the system fully is analytically sound (shoot 3s and rebound misses, don't let your opponent walk the ball up for free, actually respecting your bench players as D1 athletes who will giv 100% when they're out there) if everything we do in-between games is below baseline SEC level, then we'll continue to lose to bigger, stronger teams even if everything thing else we're doing is right. Which I earnestly believe it is the right approach in-game, but I realize that in doing "everything else right" (as I do think), CKC has risen to this level at such a breakneck speed that she didn't actually hav time to develop as a coach who is an true equal to her peers in coaching ability. We may hav simply hired her too quickly...
She has an elite system imo -- but she's still a D2 coach. A young D2 coach. But if she can get thru these trials and tribulations, she still has such a high peak ahead of her as she learns to adjust to coaching at this level, and learns the particular quirks of the P4 WBB world.
It's as chuckie says, tho. We hav all the resources in the world for her -- but will she seek them out? And worse, in adjusting to this season's woes, will she sacrifice the things that she's doing right, yet keep the things she's doing wrong? It's easy to blame what you do in-between 40 minutes entirely on what happens in 40 minutes, but everything else is just as important -- if not more! If she makes that mistake, then we'd be in for a truly awful SEC slate that might cut her UT career tragically short.
I'll have her, and our girls, in my prayers. Without doubt this will be a very difficult juncture for her. This job was certainly a blessing for Kim, but at the same time there's going to hardly be a *higher pressure job in the country. Comes with the LV legacy.
Go Lady Vols, Beat fLorida.