The Impeachment Thread

[C-south]

But you didn't have outrage when it was proven Obama also lied.
And there is more than a President in government. The House has been putting out lies for 3 years.

It’s the same as the Russian investigation. They invented a crime to go digging and found nothing. Same with this impeachment bs. They spent months grandstanding and finally impeached. Spent more time grandstanding and passed articles to the senate. Now after their clown show is over they want to keep adding to it. Too late and tough s***.

 

[BowlBrother85]

It’s the same as the Russian investigation. They invented a crime to go digging and found nothing. Same with this impeachment bs. They spent months grandstanding and finally impeached. Spent more time grandstanding and passed articles to the senate. Now after their clown show is over they want to keep adding to it. Too late and tough s***.

The Senate trial hasn't even started yet. Are you saying new evidence not included during the indictment (in this case, impeachment), can't be included at trial? Wrong.

 

[C-south]

The Senate trial hasn't even started yet. Are you saying new evidence not included during the indictment (in this case, impeachment), can't be included at trial? Wrong.

I’m saying they make s*** up as they go along when they realize their last turd didn’t or isn’t going to stick. It’s worse than the boy who cried wolf. You’re right the senate trial hasn’t even started yet. They may just dismiss all the dims bs.

 

[Orange defense]

Shall not be infringed on. It means nothing shall be passed to take away our guns...NOTHING! No laws at all.

 

[hUTch2002]

No, I've never said that. However, all of the economic indices were trending in the right direction when Obama left office. One key difference between the approval ratings of Obama and Trump, is that like most every other president, there was a direct correlation between Obama's approval rating and the state of the economy, particularly the unemployment rate. As the unemployment rate went down, Obama's approval rating went up. That doesn't appear to be the case with Trump. Donald Trump's Real Clear Politics average approval rating is stagnant. It is always within the range of 42%-46%, and only tends to shift at all depending on the civility of his behavior in that particular week. The largest downturn he experienced in his approval rating was during the government shutdown from exactly a year ago (which he foolishly took responsibility for beforehand).

My bad. I guess it was someone else on here. I assume you are predicting Trump will not be re-elected based on your other posts but I believe he will. The only question I have is who will he beat?

 

[AM64]

Do you have breakfast with anyone here on VN?

View attachment 255026


Oops

I had the feeling Waffle House is no longer just for breakfast ... at least the parking lot.

 

[AM64]

There is no "and".... Trump is a liar.

If you are going to be this disturbed over the word "know" (including the biblical version), perhaps you should consult with the expert ... Billy C.

 

[AM64]

But a damned great president

I think some people here would agree that FDR was a great president ... and a liar. Maybe it comes with the territory.

 

[AM64]

Rudy Giuliani had the most apt take on this Trump phenomenon when he told Chuck Todd that "Truth isn't truth,". I've never seen a collection of people so willing to lie in the face of photographic and even video evidence which contradicts their narrative. The way Trump and his apologists lie is audacious.

"Truth isn't truth." That says it all.

There are any number of places where that statement"Truth isn't truth" is true. DC happens to be one among many ... NYC, CA, any liberal infested place, ... Embrace your dark side, it will set you free.

 

[AM64]

The Senate trial hasn't even started yet. Are you saying new evidence not included during the indictment (in this case, impeachment), can't be included at trial? Wrong.

Tough luck. The house rushed to judgment, had a party, and even gave out favors. It's over.

 

[BowlBrother85]

If you are going to be this disturbed over the word "know" (including the biblical version), perhaps you should consult with the expert ... Billy C.

I'm disturbed by an outright lie in the face of overwhelming contradictory evidence. I'm not splitting hairs over linguistics. Trump lied.

 

[BowlBrother85]

There are any number of places where that statement"Truth isn't truth" is true. DC happens to be one among many ... NYC, CA, any liberal infested place, ... Embrace your dark side, it will set you free.

BS. You are straining to defend all things Trump... and it's stupid.

 

[BowlBrother85]

Tough luck. The house rushed to judgment, had a party, and even gave out favors. It's over.

Once again, the trial hasn't begun.

 

[C-south]

BS. You are straining to defend all things Trump... and it's stupid.

As much as you and the other dims strain to condemn all things Trump? Not even close.

 

[1972 Grad]

I’m saying they make s*** up as they go along when they realize their last turd didn’t or isn’t going to stick. It’s worse than the boy who cried wolf. You’re right the senate trial hasn’t even started yet. They may just dismiss all the dims bs.

The Senate trial hasn't even started yet. Are you saying new evidence not included during the indictment (in this case, impeachment), can't be included at trial? Wrong.

Does what the Dems are doing not look familiar?As in the Kavanaugh goat f***?

 

[Orange defense]

This will go down in history of embarrassment for Nancy Pelosi and demos. Trump is winning big, and will continue to win, win, win. This will fail. This trial is a hoax, started by Obama and Hitlery. All because she lost the 2016 election. Those seven or six that Pelosi picked should recuse themselves from this trial, because of interference/conflicting interests. How did they even get these positions anyway? There shouldn’t be one demo in the chambers of the senate floor.

 

[AM64]

BS. You are straining to defend all things Trump... and it's stupid.

Nope, there is plenty I don't like about Trump. One that tops my list is his intemperate remarks and his imprecise language. For the record I've never liked Trump, but in this particular case he simply wasn't another politician, and he frequently doesn't act like normal politicians ... sometimes if you like an animal, you have to put up with the fleas. If your side had put up somebody worthwhile, I wouldn't have voted for Trump; and your side is doing it all over again, so Trump will win again.

 

[NurseGoodVol]

Do you have breakfast with anyone here on VN?

View attachment 255026


Oops

Why yes, he does.

 

[C-south]

Does what the Dems are doing not look familiar?As in the Kavanaugh goat f***?

You ever witness someone do or say something so stupid that it embarrasses you? That’s the dims in a nutshell. So fake, inept, and disingenuous.

 

[BowlBrother85]

Nope, there is plenty I don't like about Trump. One that tops my list is his intemperate remarks and his imprecise language. For the record I've never liked Trump, but in this particular case he simply wasn't another politician, and he frequently doesn't act like normal politicians ... sometimes if you like an animal, you have to put up with the fleas. If your side had put up somebody worthwhile, I wouldn't have voted for Trump; and your side is doing it all over again, so Trump will win again.

Trump said that he didn't know Lev Parnas, and didn't know anything about Parnas and had never even spoken to Parnas. There is overwhelming video and photographic evidence to the contrary. Not to mention Jay Sekulow's e-mail to John Dowd which mentions Dowd's legal representation of Parnas being consented to by Trump..... Trump lied.

...and "imprecise language" ? You are trying to finesse Trump's patent dishonesty. It's BS. Trump is a serial liar without a shred of integrity.

 

[C-south]

Trump said that he didn't know Lev Parnas, and didn't know anything about Parnas and had never even spoken to Parnas. There is overwhelming video and photographic evidence to the contrary. Trump lied.

...and "imprecise language" ? You are trying to finesse his patent dishonesty. It's BS. Trump is a serial liar without a shred of integrity.

So it should’ve been evidence months ago? On another note, WGAF.

 

[AM64]

Once again, the trial hasn't begun.

Nope. Remember he's "impeached" ... not recommended for "impeachment". Your side found him guilty already ... before the "trial" - the verdict doesn't go away even if nothing comes of it. I guess strange things happen when you use a weird process of basically announcing guilt before attempting to determine guilt or innocence - maybe congress should look at amending things and using a better word like "indictment" so they don't go forward for all time with egg on their face. Regardless, your side rushed to judgment for political purposes ... live with it. If they don't like it, just dig a bigger hole and go for another impeachment ... go bold or go home.

 

[Orange defense]

I would say he’s being untruthful, he’s already done it to the staff recently

My Semester With the Snowflakes

Nope, there is plenty I don't like about Trump. One that tops my list is his intemperate remarks and his imprecise language. For the record I've never liked Trump, but in this particular case he simply wasn't another politician, and he frequently doesn't act like normal politicians ... sometimes if you like an animal, you have to put up with the fleas. If your side had put up somebody worthwhile, I wouldn't have voted for Trump; and your side is doing it all over again, so Trump will win again.

Just like when Hitlery called us deplorable, and Trump defended himself, and his base? Or when Joe Biden would take him out to the woodshed, and Trump said, “I’d like to see him try? I’m sure you hated that to, right?

 

[BowlBrother85]

Nope. Remember he's "impeached" ... not recommended for "impeachment". Your side found him guilty already ... before the "trial" - the verdict doesn't go away even if nothing comes of it. I guess strange things happen when you use a weird process of basically announcing guilt before attempting to determine guilt or innocence - maybe congress should look at amending things and using a better word like "indictment" so they don't go forward for all time with egg on their face. Regardless, your side rushed to judgment for political purposes ... live with it. If they don't like it, just dig a bigger hole and go for another impeachment ... go bold or go home.

This is a bunch of nonsense. The Trump Administration obstructed witnesses from testifying. Why do that if the facts are on their side? From the very beginning of this, the Trump Administration has behaved like people with something to hide. Remember that the White House fought to keep from turning over the whistleblower's complaint to Congress, as is required by law? Only after Mitch McConnell told White House counsel that they would not be receiving any cover from the Senate for refusing to hand over the complaint, did they finally agree to do it.

 

[Orange defense]

But anyways AM64, not jumping you for anything. I want your side of the bad mouthing demos. That’s all.