The Impeachment Thread

#34,051
#34,051
0nelilreb said:
That again is subject and based on your partisan ideology. I blamed your party for putting up such as horrendously sucky candidate , that you couldn’t beat someone like Trump . Get it right . I’ll go a step further ... you are doing it again .
Click to expand...
I blame Republicans for electing Trump. There's no way around that fact. I have a map, do you want to see it?
1280px-2016_Nationwide_US_presidential_county_map_shaded_by_vote_share.svg.png
 
#34,054
#34,054
Mick said:
Trump should be removed from Office, period. Sorry you don't feel that way but I would expect that from someone that want's to blame the Democrats for Trump being elected.
Click to expand...
bwaaaaa haaaaaaa haaaaaa. And you are gonna get him elected in 2024.


Thanks,
signed America
 
  • Like
Reactions: CagleMtnVol, AM64, Orange_Vol1321 and 2 others
#34,055
#34,055
USAFgolferVol said:
Another stupid response with no validity at all. Get back to me when you can discuss an issue with some real detail. You're all about the tribalism and that's cool. Trump counts on the uninformed parrots like you who are happy we are more divided than ever
Click to expand...
We gonna impeach the ************. What party said that kind of thing again?
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64, tbwhhs and VolnJC
#34,058
#34,058
BowlBrother85 said:
The Democrats didn't want the impeachment proceedings to bleed into the general election campaign and so they moved forward without trying to compel witness testimony through the federal court system. It is a political process, with political considerations being made. It's true that Democrats would not allow Republicans to call witnesses such as Alexandra Chalupa, Adam Schiff and the Bidens, but those witnesses were not germane to the core issue of whether or not Donald Trump withheld military aid to the Ukraine in exchange for a campaign favor. The Republicans were trying to deflect and shift the focus away from Trump. The Democrats didn't allow it. I suppose it's reasonable to call that "unfair" because in an actual trial, the defense is allowed to deflect and shift the focus away from the defendant. It's what a good defense team tries to do. The Democrats were in a position to keep that from happening, and so they did.

Is this executive privilege we are talking about, or entitlement? The White House's refusal to comply with the essential function of oversight will set a bad precedent for future administrations to follow... and could come back to bite Republicans one day. Eventually, there will be a President from the Democratic Party again, with a Republican-controlled House of Representatives. Good luck ever getting a subpoena complied with when that day comes.
Click to expand...

Hey genius Biden is exactly at the center of all this. He was doing Hunter and Burismas heavy lifting and Trump rightly pointed out that it should be loooked into. And this will be loooked into. Why did Hunter get the job? No over has answered this. Was it because his father was the American point man on Ukraine? I think at the very least it should be loooked into. Surely if Joe has nothing to hide he's been interested in clearing this up. Just because pot is legal in some states doesn't mean you have to partake.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#34,059
#34,059
evillawyer said:
Click to expand...

The guy is sick. In addition to all of the videos and all of the pictures of Lev Parnas talking with and standing right next to Donald Trump at Mar-a-Lago, also focus on this October 2nd, 2019 e-mail from Donald Trump's attorney Jay Sekulow to Trump's former attorney John Dowd. In this e-mail, Jay Sekulow tells Dowd that Trump has specifically consented to allowing Dowd to represent Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman. (misspelled as "Furman" in this e-mail).

From Lev Parnas's files:

************************************
John,

I have discussed the issue of representation with the President. The President consents to allowing your representation of Mr. Parnas and Mr. Furman.

Jay Sekulow
Counsel to the President

*************************************

And yet, Trump still claims to not know anything about Lev Parnas. Unreal.
 
#34,060
#34,060
BowlBrother85 said:
The Democrats didn't want the impeachment proceedings to bleed into the general election campaign and so they moved forward without trying to compel witness testimony through the federal court system. It is a political process, with political considerations being made. It's true that Democrats would not allow Republicans to call witnesses such as Alexandra Chalupa, Adam Schiff and the Bidens, but those witnesses were not germane to the core issue of whether or not Donald Trump withheld military aid to the Ukraine in exchange for a campaign favor. The Republicans were trying to deflect and shift the focus away from Trump. The Democrats didn't allow it. I suppose it's reasonable to call that "unfair" because in an actual trial, the defense is allowed to deflect and shift the focus away from the defendant. It's what a good defense team tries to do. The Democrats were in a position to keep that from happening, and so they did.

Is this executive privilege we are talking about, or entitlement? The White House's refusal to comply with the essential function of oversight will set a bad precedent for future administrations to follow... and could come back to bite Republicans one day. Eventually, there will be a President from the Democratic Party again, with a Republican-controlled House of Representatives. Good luck ever getting a subpoena complied with when that day comes.
Click to expand...

Oh and 218 whack job house members did not set a bad precident ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64, tbwhhs and SpaceCoastVol
#34,063
#34,063
BowlBrother85 said:
The guy is sick. In addition to all of the videos and all of the pictures of Lev Parnas talking with and standing right next to Donald Trump at Mar-a-Lago, also focus on this October 2nd, 2019 e-mail from Donald Trump's attorney Jay Sekulow to Trump's former attorney John Dowd. In this e-mail, Jay Sekulow tells Dowd that Trump has specifically consented to allowing Dowd to represent Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman. (misspelled as "Furman" in this e-mail).

From Lev Parnas's files:

************************************
John,

I have discussed the issue of representation with the President. The President consents to allowing your representation of Mr. Parnas and Mr. Furman.

Jay Sekulow
Counsel to the President

*************************************

And yet, Trump still claims to not know anything about Lev Parnas. Unreal.
Click to expand...

And the leg-humpers won't care in the least and will continue to maintain that the Dems have nothing on Donny ... only because they continue to be willfully blind.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BowlBrother85
#34,064
#34,064
0nelilreb said:
You know , for a party that just got what they’ve been wanting since Trump took office , they sure do seem more testy lately . It’s almost like they can see the future or something .
Click to expand...
Maybe Nancy's high fiving docusign party hangover is starting to wear off.

I like that the bar is being set so low. We will be able to impeach for damn near anything now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and VolnJC
#34,067
#34,067
vols40 said:
Hey genius Biden is exactly at the center of all this. He was doing Hunter and Burismas heavy lifting and Trump rightly pointed out that it should be loooked into. And this will be loooked into. Why did Hunter get the job? No over has answered this. Was it because his father was the American point man on Ukraine? I think at the very least it should be loooked into. Surely if Joe has nothing to hide he's been interested in clearing this up. Just because pot is legal in some states doesn't mean you have to partake.
Click to expand...
Hey dumb a$$, Hunter Biden was not on the board of directors for Burisma Holdings for the period of time that they have been under investigation for...: the germane question at hand is whether or not Trump withheld congressionally authorized military aid to the Ukraine, in order to use it as leverage against their President's willingness to perform a campaign favor for him (by going on CNN and announcing an investigation into the Bidens).
 
#34,072
#34,072
BowlBrother85 said:
Hey dumb a$$, Hunter Biden was not on the board of directors for Burisma Holdings for the period of time that they have been under investigation for...: the germane question at hand is whether or not Trump withheld congressionally authorized military aid to the Ukraine, in order to use it as leverage against their President's willingness to perform a campaign favor for him (by going on CNN and announcing an investigation into the Bidens).
Click to expand...

When was the prosecutor fired? Can you answer that? And who was the vice president? Stop with talking points.
 
#34,075
#34,075
Septic said:
BFD, he's still a lizard. He's like the pythons that are infecting the Everglades right now, that place was dangerous as fuq before - now you've got 15 ft 200 lb snakes that are looking to eat anything they can wrap around and no natural predators.

Non-native species upset the whole ecosystem and it's never in a good way. It was bad before, but now it's a free for all. It's a simpletons argument to suggest that the reason they don't want him there is because he's cleaning it up. I don't know whether that assertion is a bigger assault on my intelligence or yours.
Click to expand...
I don’t think they want him out because he’s cleaning it up but they want him out in part because he knows their dirty secrets. I’m sure he used to be on the other side of those shady deals trying to bribe politicians for favor. This isn’t the only reason but I bet it’s a factor.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top