The Impeachment Thread

I don't see anything resembling a "gloat", pointing out the reality of the overwhelming evidence is an exercise in reality - not fealty to one side or another.

Overwhelming evidence would have produced different results. The GOP would have had no choice but to fall in line if there was overwhelming evidence. Nixon was overwhelming evidence and was probably told behind close doors he had to step down.
 
  • Like
Reactions: volfanjustin
I have. I think trump is human trash unworthy of the privilege to wiping my clubs at the...club.

I do have TDS, how many times do I need to remind you of that before I have to remind you to take your alzheimers meds again.
I know. Aricept, or as I called it Ariseptic, named after you. VV takes Remicade or something like that. At least, I think it was VV.
 
Overwhelming evidence would have produced different results. The GOP would have had no choice but to fall in line if there was overwhelming evidence. Nixon was overwhelming evidence and was probably told behind close doors he had to step down.

We diverge on this point.
 
Overwhelming evidence would have produced different results. The GOP would have had no choice but to fall in line if there was overwhelming evidence. Nixon was overwhelming evidence and was probably told behind close doors he had to step down.


The difference is that in 1972 there was not this cacophony of right wing loon voices telling the stupid GOP masses that it was all a frame up. GOP voters were informed of the facts and drew the inevitable conclusions. Correctly. Now, there is an entire spin machine out there that gives lazy, dumb GOP voters excuses to disbelieve objective fact in the first place.
 
The difference is that in 1972 there was not this cacophony of right wing loon voices telling the stupid GOP masses that it was all a frame up. GOP voters were informed of the facts and drew the inevitable conclusions. Correctly. Now, there is an entire spin machine out there that gives lazy, dumb GOP voters excuses to disbelieve objective fact in the first place.
There was also evidence of actual crimes.
 
The difference is that in 1972 there was not this cacophony of right wing loon voices telling the stupid GOP masses that it was all a frame up. GOP voters were informed of the facts and drew the inevitable conclusions. Correctly. Now, there is an entire spin machine out there that gives lazy, dumb GOP voters excuses to disbelieve objective fact in the first place.

giphy.gif




giphy.gif
 
I have. I think trump is human trash unworthy of the privilege to wiping my clubs at the...club.

I do have TDS, how many times do I need to remind you of that before I have to remind you to take your alzheimers meds again.
And still beat the most qualified person to ever run. Poor socialists. LOLOLOL
 
Ha! You're still here whining about the election Luther. When will you give it up? There's something to be said for perseverance, but your actions seem more like persistent stupidity?
I would hope you know by now that I will never give it up.
Much like "Remember the Alamo", "Remember Pearl Harbor", and "Remember 9/11"; "Remember the Trump catastrophe" will live in infamy.
 

That same CNN poll only has Trump's approval rating at 44%... I guess they are only reliable when it serves your agenda though, right? It's funny how conservatives on here are so dismissive of polls and how they will always bring up the 2016 election... unless the poll says what you want it to say, in which case, you post it here.
 
That same CNN poll only has Trump's approval rating at 44%... I guess they are only reliable when it serves your agenda though, right? It's funny how conservatives on here are so dismissive of polls and how they will always bring up the 2016 election... unless the poll says what you want it to say, in which case, you post it here.
You're the last one to being up hypocrisy. Sit this one out. 😉
 
Advertisement

Back
Top