The Impeachment Thread

#28,451
#28,451
Mick said:
You do know there is nothing illegal about that don't you? It's actually DOJ policy. But guess what, Trump is being impeached and it's not for directing his Administration to use Whatsapp to conduct official business failing to archive those communications to a government server. In your puny mind, what Hillary did was worse. You suffer from the condition and gave a great example in your response.
Click to expand...

Name one other person in the history of government before Hillary , that used bleach bit to wipe a server or used hammers to totally destroy her other devises so information couldn’t be pulled from them . I was also talking about the irony of an article on false equivalence down playing something as small potatoes that the FBI did an investigation on . Your name calling response just shows how shallow you really are .
 
#28,452
#28,452
0nelilreb said:
Name one other person in the history of government before Hillary , that used bleach bit to wipe a server or used hammers to totally destroy her other devises so information couldn’t be pulled from them . I was also talking about the irony of an article on false equivalence down playing something as small potatoes that the FBI did an investigation on . Your name calling response just shows how shallow you really are .
Click to expand...
I remember the Bush WH destroyed almost everything.

George W. Bush's White House "lost" 22 million emails
 
#28,458
#28,458
0nelilreb said:
The difference was he answered honestly and without spin like I asked you to do , but you just couldn’t stop yourself from injecting the context you wanted in there . I didn’t ask for context counselor. We werent having a debate .
Click to expand...

If I cared what you wanted I would offer you some preparation H for that butt hurt you’re experiencing over nobody falling for your BS “I’m new to policy” routine that didn’t get an answer you could take out of context. Maybe I do care a little. Here you go:

Sorry I didn’t fall for your ridiculously obvious gag. I’m sure you spent a lot of time scripting that out and it just didn’t go how you wanted. My bad.

Sorry I didn’t forget that wayyyyy way back on... *checks notes*... Monday of this week you were sarcastically trying to beat people over the head with the answer to this question that you just needed a straight answer to:

0nelilreb said:
So Obama ( the president ) sets the policy. I thought I remembered that right .
Click to expand...

Sorry that your gag was so unoriginal that nobody else was dumb enough to give you an answer that you could take out of context to deliver another flimsy punchline.

I hope these apologies help you to get over it and stop whining about me not doing what you asked and going along with your ********.

I’d say try harder next time but, frankly, that already seems to be the problem.
 
#28,460
#28,460
RockyTop85 said:
If I cared what you wanted I would offer you some preparation H for that butt hurt you’re experiencing over nobody falling for your BS “I’m new to policy” routine that didn’t get an answer you could take out of context. Maybe I do care a little. Here you go:

Sorry I didn’t fall for your ridiculously obvious gag. I’m sure you spent a lot of time scripting that out and it just didn’t go how you wanted. My bad.

Sorry I didn’t forget that wayyyyy way back on... *checks notes*... Monday of this week you were sarcastically trying to beat people over the head with the answer to this question that you just needed a straight answer to:



Sorry that your gag was so unoriginal that nobody else was dumb enough to give you an answer that you could take out of context to deliver another flimsy punchline.

I hope these apologies help you to get over it and stop whining about me not doing what you asked and going along with your ********.

I’d say try harder next time but, frankly, that already seems to be the problem.
Click to expand...

Did I ask you for context ? You of all people should know not to give more information than asked for counselor . The context you keep trying to inject is open to perception and opinion , I was trying to avoid that . You insist on explaining it still . I don’t need your context or explanation . Sometimes less is more counselor .
 
#28,461
#28,461
RockyTop85 said:
From the perspective of an individual who is so morally and intellectually bankrupt as to be unable to tell the difference between an act performed to further the nation’s interest and one performed for personal gain, that is correct.
Click to expand...

If Biden and Co are corrupt (enough evidence to warrant a look) and he's a leading candidate for POTUS wouldn't it be in our national interest to do so?

I mean heck we looked into the possibility that a candidate was corrupt with a heck of a lot less evidence in 2016.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RikidyBones, tbwhhs, volfanjustin and 2 others
#28,462
#28,462
The Democrat Party.......

giphy.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hayezb, HoleInTheRoof, NorthDallas40 and 1 other person
#28,463
#28,463
hog88 said:
If Biden and Co are corrupt (enough evidence to warrant a look) and he's a leading candidate for POTUS wouldn't it be in our national interest to do so?

I mean heck we looked into the possibility that a candidate was corrupt with a heck of a lot less evidence in 2016.
Click to expand...

Sure.

I’ve said numerous times that I have no problem with an *independent* investigation of Biden. I don’t think it will find anything based on what I’ve seen, but absolutely no problem with DOJ conducting an *independent* look.

That’s not what happened. Not even close.
 
#28,464
#28,464
hog88 said:
If Biden and Co are corrupt (enough evidence to warrant a look) and he's a leading candidate for POTUS wouldn't it be in our national interest to do so?

I mean heck we looked into the possibility that a candidate was corrupt with a heck of a lot less evidence in 2016.
Click to expand...

Trump and the GOP authorized aid to Ukraine in 207 and 2018.

If Biden and corruption were the motivator for holding up the aid, why did that just suddenly come up in 2019, the year before the election?

And why was the real request simply that Ukraine announce it was launching an investigation, rather than actually do so?

Please. The International Crime Stoppers theory is just so pathetically lame. Admit what Trump did and just say you don't care. You don't mind and you are okay with it. Though I would continue to have no respect for your general integrity, at least you'd recapture a little something for base honesty.
 
#28,465
#28,465
RockyTop85 said:
Sure.

I’ve said numerous times that I have no problem with an *independent* investigation of Biden. I don’t think it will find anything based on what I’ve seen, but absolutely no problem with DOJ conducting an *independent* look.

That’s not what happened. Not even close.
Click to expand...

The alleged crimes took place in Ukraine, they would be the ones to investigate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: davethevol
#28,466
#28,466
lawgator1 said:
Trump and the GOP authorized aid to Ukraine in 207 and 2018.

If Biden and corruption were the motivator for holding up the aid, why did that just suddenly come up in 2019, the year before the election?

And why was the real request simply that Ukraine announce it was launching an investigation, rather than actually do so?

Please. The International Crime Stoppers theory is just so pathetically lame. Admit what Trump did and just say you don't care. You don't mind and you are okay with it. Though I would continue to have no respect for your general integrity, at least you'd recapture a little something for base honesty.
Click to expand...

Nobody ever testified that they heard that request.
 
#28,467
#28,467
“I really hope and pray the Senate will not just pick it up and dismiss it. America needs to hear from the witnesses, and we didn’t get to hear from them here. This was a kangaroo court,” Gohmert said.

Better be careful what you ask for, GOP. SCOTUS Chief Justice may agree with you... and call actual first hand witnesses: Mulvaney, Giuliani, Pompeo and Bolton.
 
#28,468
#28,468
hog88 said:
The alleged crimes took place in Ukraine, they would be the ones to investigate.
Click to expand...

There is no alleged crime by candidate Joe Biden. It’s an alleged violation of his oath of office of Vice President, which is properly investigated by DOJ.

Even if there were an alleged crime, the request to initiate the investigation should have (and could have, pursuant to the treaty that has been posted here) been made by DOJ.
 
#28,469
#28,469
MontyPython said:
“I really hope and pray the Senate will not just pick it up and dismiss it. America needs to hear from the witnesses, and we didn’t get to hear from them here. This was a kangaroo court,” Gohmert said.

Better be careful what you ask for, GOP. SCOTUS Chief Justice may agree with you... and call actual first hand witnesses: Mulvaney, Giuliani, Pompeo and Bolton.
Click to expand...

Let's hope they call a bunch of witnesses.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthDallas40, Orangeburst, davethevol and 3 others
#28,470
#28,470
MontyPython said:
“I really hope and pray the Senate will not just pick it up and dismiss it. America needs to hear from the witnesses, and we didn’t get to hear from them here. This was a kangaroo court,” Gohmert said.

Better be careful what you ask for, GOP. SCOTUS Chief Justice may agree with you... and call actual first hand witnesses: Mulvaney, Giuliani, Pompeo and Bolton.
Click to expand...
And Hunter Biden, Joe Biden, Eric Ciaramella and bug eyes schiff
 
  • Like
Reactions: AirVol, FallCreekVols and hjeagle1vol
#28,471
#28,471
RockyTop85 said:
There is no alleged crime by candidate Joe Biden. It’s an alleged violation of his oath of office of Vice President, which is properly investigated by DOJ.

Even if there were an alleged crime, the request to initiate the investigation should have (and could have, pursuant to the treaty that has been posted here) been made by DOJ.
Click to expand...

Refresh my memory, was Joe Biden mentioned by name in the phone call?
 
#28,472
#28,472
lawgator1 said:
Trump and the GOP authorized aid to Ukraine in 207 and 2018.

If Biden and corruption were the motivator for holding up the aid, why did that just suddenly come up in 2019, the year before the election?

And why was the real request simply that Ukraine announce it was launching an investigation, rather than actually do so?

Please. The International Crime Stoppers theory is just so pathetically lame. Admit what Trump did and just say you don't care. You don't mind and you are okay with it. Though I would continue to have no respect for your general integrity, at least you'd recapture a little something for base honesty.
Click to expand...
I don't care, I don't GAF because there was nothing wrong with the call
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top