The Impeachment Thread

  • Like
Reactions: luthervol
  • Like
Reactions: hog88
Because trying to explain the basic fundamentals of Supreme Court precedence, the procedural history and holding of U.S. v. Nixon, and a reference to a 2500 year old fable about an idiot kid whose sheep got eaten because he kept trolling the townsfolk, is a little much to undertake in one post.

Let me unpack this and shorten it for you.

“I can’t, I pulled **** out of my ass and got called on it.”
 
Let me unpack this and shorten it for you.

“I can’t, I pulled **** out of my ass and got called on it.”
I appreciate your willingness to admit that that’s what happened.

When you’ve done your homework and have a more specific point of contention, I’ll be glad to address it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rifleman
What? It's the truth. It was always the truth. Your denial doesn't change that fact.
Trump won the republican nomination primarily because he was divisive. The proverbial middle finger.
Continually flip someone off if you wish, just spare me the feigned indignation when there is a predictable response.
What another win? There won't be indignation. It will be celebration that your party will be dead
 
  • Like
Reactions: hjeagle1vol
Did you not fully expect that if he won? Had Hillary won, I knew full well that republicans would do everything within their power to impeach her and destroy her presidency in any way possible. (They were planning their strategies even prior to the election) That is the primary reason I supported Bernie.
The people who nominated Trump had to have known...if not, they're more delusional than I thought.
We'll never know for sure now will we?
 
So, you would give his progress report an Excellent Grade?
Really, I don't know.
We aren't at war ,so that is a plus. I would hope that we could find a way to have an amicable relationship with them, but "oh well" if we don't. We seem to be okay with the Saudis and they are as bad as Putin. As far as giving him Syria and Ukraine. I honestly don't care and I didn't when Obama was President.
 
I have went back or forth over this, pending this sham does make it to the Senate. At first I agreed with Graham when they considered not calling any witnesses, I guess it was his way of not legitimization this sham any further. I am now thinking they should make this thing a yuuuuuge spectacle, call everyone: Joe, Hunter, pencil neck schiff, Eric Ciaramella and draw this crap out as long as possible. Expose the radical libs
20waxo.jpg
 
Because he knew Republicans were ramping up to impeach the woman they chanted "Lock Her Up" about if she won? That isn't exactly a conspiracy theory. More of a foregone conclusion.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...al-republicans-openly-discussing-impeachment/
LOL. They had actual violations of federal law which wouldnt have not been impeachable to begin with because she wasnt (and still isnt) President.. Dimocraps planned on impeaching without ANYTHING. Huge difference.

Its almost like some of yall have literally zero understanding of anything outside of your safe space.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hjeagle1vol
So, then what point are you trying to make? Are you saying you actually agreed with these things when Obama did them or that you think it’s a problem for Trump?
Both. I don't have a problem with President Obama blocking them from testifying. I don't have a problem with President Trump doing it either. If congress wants them to testify subpoena them and let the Judiciary do their job. Then you will have actual testimony to determine if he committed a crime.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hog88
Advertisement

Back
Top