The Impeachment Thread

#25,679
#25,679
PointGuard said:
you raise an interesting point. That point translates to an interesting question. Should I do that for you when you have already dismissed established facts. The Mueller report. The testimony of witnesses at the Impeachment inquiry. Demonstrated your lack of knowledge on the oversight role of the House?

The answer is No. you can confirm everything I said but you’re so caught up in stoopid you wn’t belive a word of it. You don’t believe you’d own US Government agencies. That pretty much says all ther is to say about yoy

GTFO
Click to expand...
So once again you provide the opportunity for me to point out: You got nothing to back up your BS. You dodge all you want but you still get hit by the wrench.

iu
 
  • Like
Reactions: tennvols77 and NorthDallas40
#25,685
#25,685
Mick said:
Benghazi was a black ops site.
This is a good read Slain U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens Thrived On Tough Assignments

I didn't like the way Hillary handled it either. And honestly about that youtube video theory, I think our IC really didn't have much factual information on the attack at the time and Obama gave to the American people what little information he had. We demanded to know why and were pissed about it.
Click to expand...

Did the attackers know it was a Black Ops site?
Shouldn't the person who created the idea to marry Ambassadors to a Black Ops site, and the superiors who signed off on it be held responsible?
 
  • Like
Reactions: tennvols77
#25,686
#25,686
PointGuard said:
L


hey I am who I am. It’s not my fault you’re no match and can’t make a post without citing what’s in google or Wikileaks or based on your own know-how and personal experiences

We do share one thing in common though and I am pleased about it

We both apparently admire Luther and Mick. Yes. They both recognize the truth
Click to expand...


1. I'm not competing with you. It's just a message board.
2. Generally, compared to the other, you're a doofus.
3. Luth, Mick, Septic. Admire...no. Frequently disagree with...yes. Respect, as pertaining to message board rationale...yes.
 
#25,687
#25,687
Mick said:
I know for a fact you will but before you get off the rails, keep in the back of your mind the name Nunes. I will take the bisexual resigning over her sexcapades over, someone going to prison. I bet you think they are equal on Luther's continuum.
Click to expand...

The fact that you will make an exception for one having to resign over another is making my whole point . There’s no yeah buts , there’s no well at least it’s not ... , you are more than happy to accept one is less than the other as an excuse for what , having an ounce more character ? If you fill two buckets up with horse sh!t and one bucket has an ounce less in it ... you are still left with two buckets full of sh!t .
 
#25,688
#25,688
GVF said:
It's called google. I don't subscribe to NYT either. Just came right up and I clicked on it.
Click to expand...

That’s good. But isn’t that more whataboutism. Did you miss the part where I said she was a private citizen? If that was a crime she should be indicted and tried.
Trump on the other had is POTUS

The remedy for him. Per the Constitution it’s Impeachment
 
#25,692
#25,692
Mick said:
It will be one of the three: clintoncide, pallets of cash, or being more flexible after the election.
Click to expand...

You're all wrong - he loses sleep at night trying to connect Benghazi to Pizzagate.
 
#25,693
#25,693
PointGuard said:
That’s good. But isn’t that more whataboutism. Did you miss the part where I said she was a private citizen? If that was a crime she should be indicted and tried.
Trump on the other had is POTUS

The remedy for him. Per the Constitution it’s Impeachment
Click to expand...

She was running for president at the time. They took in a lot of money for future favors as POTUS. Except she lost. twice. Once within her own party. Once to Trump. You think the Foundation gets as much foreign donations now?
 
#25,694
#25,694
Septic said:
Oh look, a nonsensical, non-sequitur, meme deflection. I think I can speak for everyone in expressing complete shock that you'd do this.
Click to expand...
Its not a deflection. It’s a perfect representation of lib sensibilities. ORANGE MAN BAD
 
#25,696
#25,696
GVF said:
She was running for president at the time. They took in a lot of money for future favors as POTUS. Except she lost. twice. Once within her own party. Once to Trump. You think the Foundation gets as much foreign donations now?
Click to expand...

You didn't address his point about him being the president and her being a private citizen. How can you, with any intellectual honesty - believe what she did was criminal, while giving him a pass?
 
#25,697
#25,697
McDad said:
Did the attackers know it was a Black Ops site?
Shouldn't the person who created the idea to marry Ambassadors to a Black Ops site, and the superiors who signed off on it be held responsible?
Click to expand...
"Marry"? I'm sure you don't have the info to say he was forced. You act like he didn't know what was going on or why he was there.
When the uprising against Gadhafi began in the spring of 2011, Stevens was sent back to Libya. But this time he didn't go to Tripoli; instead, he became the U.S. envoy to the rebels, basing himself in their eastern stronghold of Benghazi.
Click to expand...
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top