PointGuard
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2016
- Messages
- 3,466
- Likes
- 1,486
Choosing to cross the street so that you walk 40 feet in front of an inanimate building rather that 10 feet is showing strength of conviction? What's the building going to do; convert her to a capitalist? Will she catch cooties if she walks too close to a building brandishing his name?Well by golly she needs to be condemned for sure. A woman willing to take extra measures to demonstrate/back up her beliefs and convictions
I admire her for that Let’s get her to run for President
Choosing to cross the street so that you walk 40 feet in front of an inanimate building rather that 10 feet is showing strength of conviction? What's the building going to do; convert her to a capitalist? Will she catch cooties if she walks too close to a building brandishing his name?
I believe it shows weakness of character. A lack of mental fortitude. Just as it would if someone refused to drive on any road named after MLK. It's petty and childish.
We should all choose better.
Choosing to cross the street so that you walk 40 feet in front of an inanimate building rather that 10 feet is showing strength of conviction? What's the building going to do; convert her to a capitalist? Will she catch cooties if she walks too close to a building brandishing his name?
I believe it shows weakness of character. A lack of mental fortitude. Just as it would if someone refused to drive on any road named after MLK. It's petty and childish.
We should all choose better.
edit this so I can comprehend. I wanna reply but cannot process what you've typed.And apparently if she doesn’t choose as you and your cohorts choose she chow the wrk g way. Good for you guys
I notice, like Gym Jordan and all the other right wing whack jobs on the Judiciary Committee you and no one elsehas challenged the expert opinion of any of the four constitutional scholars
As far as her convictions. They are rooted insanity as one cornerstone
You're full of it. You screeched the line dems are going to suffer for 3 years now, and so far you and the Republicans have lost big time.Sweet, I can't wait to get those dems who won in districts President Trump won in 2016 on the record. Also will be great when Senators get to bring witnesses in for questioning and not a rigged questions by pencil neck and captain high pants
Sweet, I can't wait to get those dems who won in districts President Trump won in 2016 on the record. Also will be great when Senators get to bring witnesses in for questioning and not a rigged questions by pencil neck and captain high pants
I walked around the property in Chicago. Even went inside. Doormen posted at key points forbade entry into certain areas which I assume was the residential side of the building. But it was a very nice place from what I could tell. Not nice enough to make me wanna move to Chicago and overpay for a cramped domicile in a high rise.Seriously a Trump property is not a safe place. There are all kinds of crazy out there but walking on the other side of the street from a Trump property isn't one of them. I hear the sidewalk on Trump side of the road is slippery with all the spit.
It's sort of like standing for the flag. The flag is just an inanimate piece of cloth. What's it going to do, congratulate you or give you a cup cake? It's all about symbolism and what the inanimate object represents.Choosing to cross the street so that you walk 40 feet in front of an inanimate building rather that 10 feet is showing strength of conviction? What's the building going to do; convert her to a capitalist? Will she catch cooties if she walks too close to a building brandishing his name?
I believe it shows weakness of character. A lack of mental fortitude. Just as it would if someone refused to drive on any road named after MLK. It's petty and childish.
We should all choose better.