The Impeachment Thread

[Mick]

Then impeach him , simple huh ? Nah the left didn’t lean from past mistakes , they think the longer they draw things out the better it is for them . The American voters get tired of prolonged investigations , you’ve spent Trumps entire term telling the American voter he’s guilty and then nothing ever happens . I watched and listened to MSM and all the progressive liberals tell me Trump is going down for three years and now we are at the point of “ I’ll be happy with censure “ . That’s a monumental fail on the lefts part and you can’t spin it fast enough to make censure from the house mean anything . You are losing the voters by dragging this out , your own party will be pissed if you settle for censure. Let’s watch and see what happens next .

This aged well.

 

[Volsurance]

 

[evillawyer]

Yep

 

[hUTch2002]

"Catch"? He is already caught in a non legal sense but you actually mean "prove", which the GOP is so desperate to keep from happening.

I’m glad you agree proof of an impeachable offense hasn’t been provided. First Luther agreed and now you. You guys are coming around!

 

[NorthDallas40]

Really, I can only understand half of what comes out of his mouth. I did better with the accents in Trainspotting.

I’ll translate.

“This whole process is a farce and a scam with the timeline and methods used thus far.”

You’re welcome.

 

[NorthDallas40]

Yep

Ah good to hear from ole butthurt Walter

 

[VolnJC]

Maybe someone else mentions this below but did you catch how he basically said the FBI fudging paperwork is no big deal? When it’s hearsay against Trump that idiot wants Trump thrown out. When there’s actual evidence of a crime it’s no big deal because it was an act against Trump and his minions. More hypocrisy from Dems.

Yep and apparently child porn on your phone and illegally funneling millions toward the Clinton campaign is okay as long as you help take down the Orange POTUS

 

[NorthDallas40]

View attachment 242850

Solid... and accurate

 

[CagleMtnVol]

Is it too late for Karlan to jump into the primaries. She's got some spunk.

 

[evillawyer]

What, the Tweedledees and Tweedledums on the GOP side would never play fast and loose with the facts.

 

[NorthDallas40]

Is it too late for Karlan to jump into the primaries. She's got some spunk.

Not shocking her schtick would resonate with you

 

[MontyPython]

I’m glad you agree proof of an impeachable offense hasn’t been provided. First Luther agreed and now you. You guys are coming around!

So what, exactly, do you require as proof? Trump literally saying "I DO QUID PRO QUO!" on videotape and affirmed as 100% accurate by all 9 SCOTUS judges?

 

[evillawyer]

Thx! Do you know him from your time together at the Derek Zoolander School for Kids who can't read good?

I’ll translate.

“This whole process is a farce and a scam with the timeline and methods used thus far.”

You’re welcome.

 

[NorthDallas40]

Thx! Do you know him from your time together at the Derek Zoolander School for Kids who can't read good?

Nah ran into him while he was moving into the section 8 housing rentals in your lib heads recently made available when they announced he was the GOP witness for this farce.

 

[MontyPython]

I say this to all the Trump defenders here on this issue: By ignoring the obvious truth that Trump committed corrupt acts, and failing to support his removal from office, you are thereby not only putting man over office, but you are also granting future Presidents carte blanch to commit whatever self-serving acts they choose to do in their course of office. Unchecked. Total. Power.

In the long run, you are snipping the balls of our legislative branch in favor of short-term gain in the form of saving your embattled President.

As they say, Karma is a b*tch.

 

[Velo Vol]

 

[NorthDallas40]

I say this to all the Trump defenders here on this issue: By ignoring the obvious truth that Trump committed corrupt acts, and failing to support his removal from office, you are thereby not only putting man over office, but you are also granting future Presidents carte blanch to commit whatever self-serving acts they choose to do in their course of office. Unchecked. Total. Power.

In the long run, you are snipping the balls of our legislative branch in favor of short-term gain in the form of saving your embattled President.

As they say, Karma is a b*tch.

 

[Velo Vol]

I say this to all the Trump defenders here on this issue: By ignoring the obvious truth that Trump committed corrupt acts, and failing to support his removal from office, you are thereby not only putting man over office, but you are also granting future Presidents carte blanch to commit whatever self-serving acts they choose to do in their course of office. Unchecked. Total. Power.

In the long run, you are snipping the balls of our legislative branch in favor of short-term gain in the form of saving your embattled President.

As they say, Karma is a b*tch.

Basically what Turley said in the above clip in 1998.

 

[zeppelin128]

So what, exactly, do you require as proof? Trump literally saying "I DO QUID PRO QUO!" on videotape and affirmed as 100% accurate by all 9 SCOTUS judges?

That wouldn't work either. It would be branded a deep fake video perpetrated by the Soros run Deep State and the lizard people that live underneath the Vatican.

 

[hUTch2002]

So what, exactly, do you require as proof? Trump literally saying "I DO QUID PRO QUO!" on videotape and affirmed as 100% accurate by all 9 SCOTUS judges?

Something that actually proves that Trump used bribery and/or extortion to help him win the 2020 election. So far all I’ve seen is a lot of opinion that was Trump’s plan. Extortion goes out the window because he released the money well ahead of the provided deadline. Bribery goes out the window because there was no act performed to get the money and Zelensky is saying there was never any pressure to act in order to receive the money. Unless some recording pops up that proves otherwise this case is going nowhere.

 

[Mick]

Something that actually proves that Trump used bribery and/or extortion to help him win the 2020 election. So far all I’ve seen is a lot of opinion that was Trump’s plan. Extortion goes out the window because he released the money well ahead of the provided deadline. Bribery goes out the window because there was no act performed to get the money and Zelensky is saying there was never any pressure to act in order to receive the money. Unless some recording pops up that proves otherwise this case is going nowhere.

They could produce the pee tape and you would still demand more proof that it was Russian hookers and not Miami hookers.

 

[NorthDallas40]

They could produce the pee tape and you would still demand more proof that it was Russian hookers and not Miami hookers.

Produce the pee tape and we’ll address it.

They call that kind of stuff “evidence”. You’re welcome.

 

[MontyPython]

Lawdy. Confirmed partisan as of today.

 

[NorthDallas40]

Basically what Turley said in the above clip in 1998.

I hope they do ask Turley about that video. Because I’ll bet he knows it exists, has considered it would be brought up, and is prepared to answer.

 

[MontyPython]

Something that actually proves that Trump used bribery and/or extortion to help him win the 2020 election. So far all I’ve seen is a lot of opinion that was Trump’s plan. Extortion goes out the window because he released the money well ahead of the provided deadline. Bribery goes out the window because there was no act performed to get the money and Zelensky is saying there was never any pressure to act in order to receive the money. Unless some recording pops up that proves otherwise this case is going nowhere.

So, when you say, "Something that actually proves that Trump used bribery and/or extortion to help him win the 2020 election", by your logic:

When a bank robbery gets caught in the act, he shouldn't be convicted because he failed to actually complete the crime.

Noice.