The Impeachment Thread

#21,953
#21,953
1972 Grad said:
Except for the f*****g World Series. The Nationals sneaked up on me. Of course, they also sneaked up on some pretty good teams. I generally do pretty good on politics.
Click to expand...
It helps for you having been around long enough to provide draft edits on the DoI and Constitution to your Continental Congress representative
 
  • Like
Reactions: NEO, volfanjustin and 1972 Grad
#21,954
#21,954
NorthDallas40 said:
“is no more valid than @NorthDallas40 argument that the right doesn’t seek to resist those efforts because it threatens their ideals of a moral society.”

So your defense of an argument you made is to point to an argument I didn’t make?!

🤦‍♂️

Factual objection “counselor”
Click to expand...
NorthDallas40 said:
Ok I just reject your whole premise then since you’re saying the entire right takes a morality viewpoint
Click to expand...
 
#21,956
#21,956
SpaceCoastVol said:
NO president. as in none... would go to the hill to testify for this kind of crap. Your leftists are gonna keep bringing witnesses that say nothing until they get that one that has an impression that Mr Trump did something wrong. And then it will be non-stop 24/7 MSM crowing about it... completely discounting the 300 other witnesses that said nothing was improper. The Queen Bitch of the Left is not president. She wants to be relevant. She will stand up and talk to congress for the rest of her miserable, bitter life as long as she's in the public eye.
Click to expand...

So apparently you are not wondering why Mulvaney, Perry, Pompeo and others don’t come in and dispute all this testimony if Trump’s position was not actually bribery? And apparently you are not wondering why, because they can’t dispute the testimony of witnesses, the Freedom Caucus Is reduced to attacking their character ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hunerwadel
#21,958
#21,958
SpaceCoastVol said:
You should care more about how someone gets to be millionaires AFTER they go into politics. And a tax return doesn't tell you shiite about how someone earned their net worth. Are you really this naive? People like Pelosi/Shumer have far more leverage over people than Trump did as a private citizen.
Click to expand...
Yes he is. I can testify
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol
#21,959
#21,959
NorthDallas40 said:
2+2 = made up ****?

No way you can equate or even extrapolate my quote to the right abdicating their moral view. My point was I didn’t make that argument in the first place and you don’t get to attach it to me by your own inference. Swingandamiss
Click to expand...

I don’t know what this word salad means, either.
 
#21,960
#21,960
1972 Grad said:
Except for the f*****g World Series. The Nationals sneaked up on me. Of course, they also sneaked up on some pretty good teams. I generally do pretty good on politics.
Click to expand...

The Houston fans booed Trump when he attended. Jinx city. Shoulda took the Nats at that point.
 
#21,964
#21,964
RockyTop85 said:
I don’t know what this word salad means, either.
Click to expand...
Ok. Best I can tell is your defense of an argument some other group didn’t make is to point to an argument I didn’t make either. I’ll bet your fun with jurys.

“No you dumb simple minded ***** listen to my elegant intellectual message!”

🤦‍♂️
 
  • Like
Reactions: 37L1
#21,969
#21,969
PointGuard said:
So apparently you are not wondering why Mulvaney, Perry, Pompeo and others don’t come in and dispute all this testimony if Trump’s position was not actually bribery? And apparently you are not wondering why, because they can’t dispute the testimony of witnesses, the Freedom Caucus Is reduced to attacking their character ?
Click to expand...
yep. I am waiting for the charges.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolnJC
#21,971
#21,971
RockyTop85 said:
Sorry, I don’t know what that means.

The left typically look at individual behavior and say “but is it legal?” And “if not, does the law uphold our vision of equality?”

The right used to, as a whole, look at behavior and judge it by their personal valuation of right and wrong.

That’s nothing more than a description of some of the natural tension between the American right and American left.

But with Trump, his apologists have abandoned any pretense of those personal guiding principles of morality that create a valuation of “right or wrong.” We’re now to the point where they’re using sound bytes to thread the needle of some procedural technicality like “burden of proof” or just blatantly mischaracterizing the context of “high crimes and misdemeanors” to advance the notion that the conduct of this man is acceptable or unproven.

That’s not just limited to this instance of conduct. Obstruction, theft from charities, kids in cages, grabbing pussies, the response to Jamaal Kashoggi, Hong Kong... etcetera. If it’s not covered by “but Obama*” or “just like any other president” then it’s “that’s within his article II power.”

None of that is compatible with the Republican Party I supported. It doesn’t conserve anything and it puts slack in the line representing that tension I described above.

The point was not what the government should impose on people, that’s backwards, that’s what’s being capitulated to. It’s about what sense of morality the people should impose on their elected officials.
Click to expand...


Sorry. That's not it. At least not for me. It's the silence and turning the blind eye when Obama caged kids, but as soon as Trump is elected, it's all Trump doing this. Now it matters to libs cause it's not one of theirs. It has nothing to do with..but, but...or whataboutisms...it's the double standard we are tired of being measured with. Why didn't the left impeach Obama when he killed American agents with the guns he sold to Mexico? They went out of their way o sweep it under the rug. Why wasn't Hils busted for Russia contributing to the Clinton Foundation when she was SOS. It's not about whether Trump did wrong or not, we just don't give a s*** because of all the precedents the left has set forth the last 8 years prior to Trump.
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood and SpaceCoastVol
#21,972
#21,972
1972 Grad said:
This whole thing looks to me like a bunch of pencil pushing desk jockeys, who were butthurt at being ignored by the new administration, are willing to be used by a bunch of subversive Communists to overturn an election.
Click to expand...
I didn't think it would turn out well for the radical left, it went even worse for them then I thought it would. Pelosi has to be fuming over her 18th martini for the day
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement





Back
Top