The Impeachment Thread

[volfanjustin]

“Was their a quid pro quo? The answer is yes.”

He presumed it, that's not a fact, that's not evidence. It's over (not that most people ever took it seriously)

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

bombshell testimony?

She'll (Hill) be using that blue hot blow torch testimony today I'm sure....

 

[VolnJC]

“Was their a quid pro quo? The answer is yes.”

Lol watch actual testimony instead of sound bites next time

 

[luthervol]

Nunes talking to the lowest quarter.

 

[tvolsfan]

Sounds like a reliable source that definitely wouldn’t target selected soundbites.

 

[Obsessed]

Sounds like a reliable source that definitely wouldn’t target selected soundbites.

It was ****ing TV.

 

[Septic]

Does ordering executive branch employees not to comply with impeachment move the needle for you on removal/impeachment?

I think it makes a shtty president look guilty and I think he'd rather look guilty than be found guilty. Congress has subpoena power and has the tools to enforce it, they're simply choosing not to do it because it takes time.

I absolutely think trump is unfit for the presidency, long before this - the only problem I have with trumps actions is that he was using taxpayer dollars to dig up dirt on a political rival. That's what dictators do. I don't think that's an impeachable offense. Scummy and unbecoming of the presidency, yes. Worth firing for, no.

 

[VolnJC]

Sounds like a reliable source that definitely wouldn’t target selected soundbites.

Watch the video it's testimony...I can link it from other sources if Don Jr triggers your TDS

 

[tvolsfan]

It was ****ing TV.

You didn’t contradict what I said. It’s like one of us said a few days ago, you could watch an Alabama highlight video of the LSU game and think Alabama won.

 

[tvolsfan]

Watch the video it's testimony...I can link it from other sources if Don Jr triggers your TDS

Screech!

 

[VolnJC]

Screech!

Link to where Sondland proves President engaged in quid pro quo?

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

Nunes talking to the lowest quarter.

.........sitting on the edge & you're listening with great anticipation of every word coming out too....

 

[tvolsfan]

Link to where Sondland proves President engaged in quid pro quo?

“Was their a quid pro quo? The answer is yes”

 

[Septic]

If it’s not impeachable then why are we wasting time with this crap?

For the same reason we wasted time on Monica giving bill a BJ in 1990.

Politics.

 

[evillawyer]

“Was their a quid pro quo? The answer is yes”

 

[volfanjustin]

Sounds like a reliable source that definitely wouldn’t target selected soundbites.

They asked him directly if he heard or if someone told him the President wanted something in return, he said no. You are a partisan liberal, nothing you hear would change your mind. You had your mind made up from Nov 2016 that this President should be impeached. Just remember this very dangerous precedent you all have set

 

[tvolsfan]

They asked him directly if he heard or if someone told him the President wanted something in return, he said no. You are a partisan liberal, nothing you hear would change your mind. You had your mind made up from Nov 2016 that this President should be impeached. Just remember this very dangerous precedent you all have set

Screech!

 

[volfanjustin]

She'll (Hill) be using that blue hot blow torch testimony today I'm sure....

I wonder if she will break out the IEDs?

 

[VolnJC]

“Was their a quid pro quo? The answer is yes”

You left out "it was my presumption"

 

[volfanjustin]

Screech!

LOL about what I expected.

 

[tvolsfan]

You left out "it was my presumption"

He said that later, specifically when talking about the financial aid. If your defense is the quid pro quo was actually carried out on a random hunch, then you probably also believe Tom Brady didn’t actually tell his ballboys to deflate the footballs.

 

[volfanjustin]

You left out "it was my presumption"

He didn't hear that part, you think CNN played that?

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

No clue, but the Intel committee needs to get back to its purpose and stop with the partisan BS. We do not need partisan hacks in charge of that commitee.

too late.

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

“Was their a quid pro quo? The answer is yes”

Saying this over & over again with no proof that it indeed happened does not make this true...no matter how many times you close your eyes and click your heels and wish for it to become true.......not reality.

 

[1972 Grad]

For the same reason we wasted time on Monica giving bill a BJ in 1990.

Politics.

Two things. Bush was in office in 1990, and getting a blow job wasn't one of the charges in Clinton's impeachment. I believe they were perjury and obstruction of justice.