The Impeachment Thread

This BS hearing is all a cover-up by the Dims. Trying to falsely put crimes on Trump when in reality the Dims are the ones guilty of colluding w/Ukraine in digging up any kind of dirt to put on Trump and to make Hillary the next person to become their lap dog president and to keep or to continue their crimes to go un-checked.

That is absolute fact. And can and has been proven. Which is about the time the War on Trump started.
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood
This BS hearing is all a cover-up by the Dims. Trying to falsely put crimes on Trump when in reality the Dims are the ones guilty of colluding w/Ukraine in digging up any kind of dirt to put on Trump and to make Hillary the next person to become their lap dog president and to keep or to continue their crimes to go un-checked.
giphy.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: tvolsfan
What? A 9 second clip of facial expressions tells the story.
23ub56.jpg
 
This BS hearing is all a cover-up by the Dims. Trying to falsely put crimes on Trump when in reality the Dims are the ones guilty of colluding w/Ukraine in digging up any kind of dirt to put on Trump and to make Hillary the next person to become their lap dog president and to keep or to continue their crimes to go un-checked.
Just wait until it goes to the Senate
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolnJC
Except that ya'll keep wanting him gone for reasons not proven or legitimate. Being an A** is not a reason. Being someone that is not woven of the DC cloth is not a reason. Being someone that incessantly calls people out on twitter is not a reason. Being his own worst enemy is not a reason. If I was in his shoes, it'd be about three things: Run the country. Go home and tap that hot wife. Let my accomplishments do the talking.
As of today the bolded is not true by any stretch of the imagination.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tvolsfan
What? A 9 second clip of facial expressions tells the story.
No but this does:

"I know that members of this Committee have frequently framed these complicated issues in the form of a simple question: Was there a 'quid pro quo?' As I testified previously, with regard to the requested White House call and White House meeting, the answer is yes." - Gordon Sondland to David Nunes
 
No but this does:

"I know that members of this Committee have frequently framed these complicated issues in the form of a simple question: Was there a 'quid pro quo?' As I testified previously, with regard to the requested White House call and White House meeting, the answer is yes." - Gordon Sondland to David Nunes

The guy has said the exact opposite during his testimony.
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood
Advertisement

Back
Top