The Impeachment Thread

All of those are legal conclusions beyond the purview of fact witnesses. You don't ask fact witnesses who witnessed a killing whether they saw evidence of second degree manslaughter.
Prosecutor: Did you see any evidence of larceny grand theft?
Witness: No, he just stole some really expensive things.
Republicans: You see, he’s innocent!
 
Welp I guess it's over for the Dems

Don't matter. The Clown News Network will cover for the DIMs as always and as always the DIM voters will swallow it whole.
How about the conclusion where you idiots claimed Volker has changed his statement on the phone call being inappropriate and him stating, today under oath, he did no such thing. Those kinds of facts?
They believe the Fake News every time. Suckers!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:)
 
Prosecutor: Did you see any evidence of larceny grand theft?
Witness: No, he just stole some really expensive things.
Republicans: You see, he’s innocent!

Prosecutor: Did you see any evidence grand theft larceny?

Witness: No but I heard through my friend’s cousin’s sister’s boyfriend that somebody might’ve stole something from someone at some point.
 
What makes you believe that? Because otherwise I'd be a Trump sycophant?

I watched today, did you?
Yes I did. But I did so with a open mind and listened to the testimony.

What grabbed my attention the most, was Vindmans slip of the tongue

Going to make changes to the phone calls transcript? Yeah. Ok Septic. This **** is on the up.

Trump ****ed y’all when he released the transcript. You didn’t think he would do it. The libs were all in and had no choice but to follow through and it’s backfired.

Better luck next time buddy.
 
Advertisement

Back
Top