The Impeachment Thread

This is my comment:


Your reply was what it was.
Correct. Your reply was the same work out narrative that simply is DOA but you’re still trying to sell it even after changing the name of the narrative three damn times. Then when it was obvious you couldn’t see that ****... again... you went to the old standby “lol you’re screeching!”

🤦‍♂️
 
I don’t even know what you’re gloating about me not answering.
🤦‍♂️
it was my turn.

You did a yesterday evening dry by sales job of “so the transcript isn’t a transcript right?” I asked, up to six times now, for a different transcript which you supported or a list of officials with direct knowledge of the call that contested the accuracy of the transcript content. You went mum. My belief is because you have no such information. I’m sure you’ll now tell me no you missed all six references. Oh well what’s a red hatter to do 🤷‍♂️
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol
🤦‍♂️
it was my turn.

You did a yesterday evening dry by sales job of “so the transcript isn’t a transcript right?” I asked, up to six times now, for a different transcript which you supported or a list of officials with direct knowledge of the call that contested the accuracy of the transcript content. You went mum. My belief is because you have no such information. I’m sure you’ll now tell me no you missed all six references. Oh well what’s a red hatter to do 🤷‍♂️
Can you quote said sales routine?
 
I’m going for a bike ride. The search feature is your friend. It’s with the last 10 pages or so of this thread. Or use your notification history. You have several options enjoy.
You’re the one beclowning yourself over this. I’m not going on a search expedition for a figment of your imagination.
 
Advertisement

Back
Top