The Impeachment Thread

#19,376
#19,376
Obsessed said:
Can’t we all get along?
Click to expand...
F$&@ you!

@PeaceCorpsVol this is an example of getting frisky with a forum buddy whom I’ve established rapport with. If you look thru the off topic thread you’ll see many examples of it. And with no context you’d think OB and I hated each other. Quite the opposite and I would encourage you to read that thread. It gives us all some perspective on each other so that when we do go at it we have a little more context to work with than some random anonymous internet account 🤷‍♂️Just leave politics at the damn door on the way in!

And f$& you still OB! 😘
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood, SpaceCoastVol, RavinDave and 1 other person
#19,378
#19,378
PeaceCorpsVol said:
No that’s all me. I guess sometimes it isn’t easy being the lone beacon of truth in here. It can erode ones will and I admit I am but a flawed being at times around y’all. But I will stay strong for you.
Click to expand...
Let me try that again for you.

No that’s me. But I can’t help that I’m a raging ******* and my wife will affirm that’s who I am . I just gotta keeps it real while I’m screaming the truth from the rafters.

Same message. Different delivery. One actually keeps civil exchange going 🤷‍♂️
 
#19,379
#19,379
NorthDallas40 said:
Let me try that again for you.

No that’s me. But I can’t help that I’m a raging ******* and my wife will affirm that’s who I am . I just gotta keeps it real while I’m screaming the truth from the rafters.

Same message. Different delivery. One actually keeps civil exchange going 🤷‍♂️
Click to expand...
I prefer my style thanks!
 
#19,380
#19,380
NorthDallas40 said:
F$&@ you!

@PeaceCorpsVol this is an example of getting frisky with a forum buddy whom I’ve established rapport with. If you look thru the off topic thread you’ll see many examples of it. And with no context you’d think OB and I hated each other. Quite the opposite and I would encourage you to read that thread. It gives us all some perspective on each other so that when we do go at it we have a little more context to work with than some random anonymous internet account 🤷‍♂️Just leave politics at the damn door on the way in!

And f$& you still OB! 😘
Click to expand...
That’s it!!!
Waffle House, high noon!
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood and NorthDallas40
#19,381
#19,381
Rifleman said:
Yovanovitch is about 1000 times tougher than the thin-skinned vulgarian in the Oval Office, who cannot abide even the slightest of criticisms.

You know that her ability to within the intimidation campaign is not what is at issue here.
Click to expand...
It’s all the hypersensitive media and Dems looking for anything to get upset about. He basically said she didn’t do a good job. Would I want a former boss sending stuff about me after firing me? Of course not but if I went out in public saying things about that boss then it wouldn’t shock me if it happened.
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood
#19,382
#19,382
PeaceCorpsVol said:
I prefer my style thanks!
Click to expand...
All I’m saying is lay a little ground work before “you be you”. Don’t change who you are nobody has that right to ask of you. Look at how you and I are now talking in the middle of this thread and we most definitely did NOT get off on the right foot. And I’d like to do a reset based on the guy that posted last night and I think Dave would too. 🤷‍♂️ And seriously hit the off topic thread so we can occasionally see “laid back Vols fan PCV” so that when we see “angry liberal raging PCV” we will have more context.
 
#19,384
#19,384
MontyPython said:
This is akin to an Defense Attorney demanding that a Grand Jury make all of its evidence public while it's simply reviewing the evidence and formulating potential charges.

THIS IS NOT HOW THIS WORKS.

And jerkoffs like Jim Jordan know it.

If you buy into it, you're just being ignorant.
Click to expand...
You can't hold secret meetings in the basement so it fits your narrative.
 
#19,387
#19,387
Orange_Vol1321 said:
You can't hold secret meetings in the basement so it fits your narrative.
Click to expand...

If you're referring to the location where depositions are taken of potential witnesses, these are 100% legal and appropriate for such impeachment inquiry proceedings. This occurred with Clinton's impeachment, as well.
 
#19,396
#19,396
hUTch2002 said:
Apples and oranges and wouldn’t be enough to convict someone of murder anyway. I thought you were an attorney.
Click to expand...

Did I maintain it was sufficient for conviction? The example was one that shows a purported alibi is false. That's often relevant in a murder trial, even though it does not directly provide evidence of the murder. It simply eliminates one possible innocent explanation of the alleged murderer's whereabouts. That's all the example was supposed to show. Evidence can be relevant without directly establishing the crime itself.

The testimony yesterday was never offered to establish that Trump committed a crime. It was to explain why she was removed, which will ultimately be linked to Trump's latter illegal acts.

Imagine that a bank robber used a mask. The prosecution calls the store clerk as a witness to the robber buying the mask. The evidence that store clerk has to offer is not of a crime, but something that was part of what would later be used in the crime.
 
#19,397
#19,397
MontyPython said:
Sondland appears to be in real legal jeopardy at this juncture. He's already amended his testimony once - doing a complete 180 degrees from 'there was no QPQ' to 'yeah, there was QPQ'. And now Holmes testified last night. He clearly undermines a central claim in Sondland’s testimony: That Sondland didn’t know that Trump and his personal lawyer Rudolph W. Giuliani’s interest in investigating a Ukrainian company that employed Joe Biden’s son Hunter Biden had anything to do with the Biden family.

Will Sondland fabricate some elaborate new yarn when he testifies again, or will he come clean and hang the President out to dry?

This is FIRST HAND knowledge, so Trump's apologists will potentially lose yet another one of their lame arguments in defending him.
Click to expand...

Here's what I don't like. Suppose Sondland lies his ass off. Schiff makes a criminal referral. Guess what. That ultimately goes to Trump's fixer, Barr (or someone reporting to Barr).
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement





Back
Top