PIERS MORGAN: If we swapped the name Hunter Biden for Donald Trump Jr, the Democrats and media would be going absolutely nuts - so it's time to start asking Joe Biden the key Ukraine questions he doesn't want to answer
I have a question about this
Ukraine scandal.
Itās a simple question, but I think a relevant and important one given the current explosive cacophony of Impeachment noise erupting all around Washington.
And itās a question that I know will provoke an instant new onslaught of hysteria from all sides.
Some will furiously accuse me of playing āwhatabouteryā to try to distract attention from what they see as the real story.
Others will furiously applaud me for highlighting what THEY see as the real story.
The rest who read it will either be so furious they canāt express themselves at all due to all the foam spewing from their mouths - a common malady in these shrieking social media times ā or they donāt care.
But one thingās for certain, itās a question that needs asking.
Itās not a question about President Trumpās conduct during that now infamous July phone call with Ukranian President Zelensky.
My view of that, as I wrote last week, is it was a very dumb call to make and Trump is now getting all the savage blowback he deserves for being so reckless.
I donāt know what the hell he was thinking directly asking a foreign leader to dig up dirt on his main rival for the 2020 election, but it was utter madness on his part to do it so soon after the Mueller report cleared him of colluding with Russians to fix the 2016 election.
Whether it was criminal or impeachable madness remains to be seen, though most impartial observers ā yes, there are still a few left of this dying breed ā appear to think it wasnāt unless future investigations prove Trump executed a āquid-pro-quoā threat by withholding military aid for Ukraine unless Zelensky agreed to the dirt-digging.
At the moment, that remains speculation not fact.
Nor does my question relate to the increasingly bonkers behavior of Trumpās personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani.
No, my question relates to the issue of Joe Biden and his son Hunterās $50,000-a-month employment with a Ukraine gas company while his father was Vice-President, and despite him having almost zero qualifications for the job.
And in particular, whether Biden Snr intervened to stop an investigation into corruption that might have caused problems for his son.
āThereās a lot of talk about Bidenās son,ā Trump said on that Zelensky call, āthat Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that.ā
Itās true - there IS a lot of talk about it.
Yet the Bidens, and the Democrats, are adamant thereās nothing to see here.
Yet I definitely have a few concerns that should be commanding a lot more attention from the mainstream media:
1) What exactly did Joe Biden Do in the Ukraine? President Obama made him his point man there after the overthrow of pro-Russian president Viktor Yanukovych in the 2014 revolution. Biden visited Ukraine at least a dozen times over the next two years, ostensibly to help new pro-Western president Petro Poroshenko root out corruption. But what was Biden really doing? We should be told.
2) How and why did Hunter Biden come to land such a lucrative job in the spring of 2014 with Burisma, the largest private gas company in Ukraine? He doesnāt appear to have any real credentials for it other than being the US Vice-Presidentās son. We should be told.
3) What did Hunter Biden do for Burisma? Who did he meet, what deals did he fix, what influence did he wield and how? How did he earn his $50,000 a month? We should be told.
4) Why, as DailyMail.com reveals today, did Hunterās investment firm partner Chris Heinz ā former Secretary of State John Kerryās stepson ā split from him when he joined Burisma because he was reportedly worried about Bidenās poor judgement and how it would look? And did Heinz share those concerns with Joe Biden?
5) What conversations did Biden Snr have with his son about Burisma? He says none, but Hunter previously said they had at least one. Neither answer seems credible given how close they were and what they were doing at the time in Ukraine. āAsk the right questionsā snapped Biden Snr when a reporter tried to push him on this last week. This is a perfectly right question to ask. We should be told.
6) Did, crucially, Biden Snr interfere with any investigations into Burisma that were conducted because the owner Mykola Zlochevsky was close to ousted Yanukovych? We know Biden Snr boasted of successfully demanding to have Ukraineās top prosecutor Viktor Shokin fired if the government wanted $1 billion in U.S. aid. But was another reason that he wanted to protect Hunter from being dragged into any Burisma probe? If that were true then Biden would surely be guilty of exactly the same kind of thing Trumpās been accused of? Biden vehemently denies it, and no hard evidence has yet emerged to prove otherwise. But this is the key charge being leveled by a Trump campaign that ironically calls Biden āQuid Pro Joeā. Again, we should be told.
Did Biden Snr interfere with any investigations into Burisma that were conducted because the owner Mykola Zlochevsky (above) was close to ousted Yanukovych?
It's time to start asking Joe Biden the Ukraine questions he doesn't want to answer. | Daily Mail Online
FAIL. I figured you couldn't rationalize Trump's threat of "civil war".
