The Impeachment Thread

How can those senators that are running against him allowed to sit in judgement? Shouldn't they recuse themselves? No. Of course not. Thhe only spent a few hours last night talking about how dispicable Mr Trump is, but they will be impartial.

You have to really sit back and soak up the aroma on this one. The whole crap show is supposedly about using one's position to force an investigation to the detriment of a possible or potential political opponent. But it's OK for Trump's potential or possible political opponents sit in judgment of him ... and somehow that's not using their position for political advantage. Amazing. I still say that by abstaining (voting "present") in the house vote, Tulsi has been the only dim to show any kind of respect for the process.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NurseGoodVol
Didn't you spend time in the Mueller report thread??

You may want to pump the brakes on calling out other peoples BS when you peddle it on the daily.

Actually no, I overtly stated I didn't think Trump should be impeached.

Oops. Try again.
 
Last edited:
Per an MSNBC headline that was just shown on Chris Hayes's show: Parnas Implicates Trump, Pence, Pompeo and Barr. Also, Parnas says that Trump lied about not knowing him... well, that has already been proven but it does look interesting.

Rachel Maddow at 9 pm on MSNBC, guys. I know you won't miss it!

Nah, I'm watching the Travel Channel @ 8 pm >>>> Paranormal Caught on Camera.
 
Doesn't matter they serve at the pleasure of the President if he wants he can have any ambassador or head of any three letter organization or Secretary of Defense fired for sneezing in church or the wind changes direction.

Absolutely, and the loons don't get that many ambassadors buy the job with campaign contributions. Easy come - easy go.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tbwhhs and vols40
Are you saying that one time on one night thing means something? And I would guess ole rach will never be able to pronounce how much more money Sean has.

Gosh, its not even a challenge baiting you guys into strawmaning anymore.

I was pretty clear on my point, you weenies don't have to like it but your not going to move the goal posts and not get a booger flicked at ya.
 
The most explosive parts of the Maddow/Parnas interview so far, in the words of Lev Parnas :

"Vice President Pence canceled his trip to Zelensky's inauguration when Zelensky's top aide wouldn't agree to Rudy Giuliani's demand that he announce an investigation of the Bidens."

"Trump and Giuliani weren't interested in investigating corruption in the Ukraine, only the appearance that there was an investigation into the Bidens."

"President Trump knew exactly what was going on. I was on the ground doing their work."

"The only motivation behind getting Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch out of her post, was to begin an investigation into the Bidens.
 
I was sitting here and waiting for the balloons & the confetti to drop from the ceiling......it's a parade.
Our tax dollars are working hard for the Dims to go home with a souvenirs pen......put them in the bank vault to keep or hand them out to the grand kids when you see them next. It's all one big party for Dims today.

You have to admit it's impressive that anyone can be far enough removed from reality to run victory laps during a pit stop.
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood
Parnas Implicates Trump, Pence, Pompeo and Barr. Also, Parnas says that Trump lied about not knowing him... well, that has already been proven but it does look interesting.
I've not heard him before, but he's articulate, seems to have a good memory, not beating around the bush.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Septic
So it was just one night you wanted us to see . Why are you so mad at people asking a simple question . Every time somebody asks something you act like your panties are all in a bunch . Maybe when you pull them out you can rejoin the polite discussion we were having and stop being a little Biotch. 😘

I see you're still tweaking about telling you to calm down earlier. I expected something more original than repeating my words back to me, though I don't rightly know why I would have. It's pretty clear you're still upset, you tell on yourself when you continue to miss (or misrepresent) my point while resorting to ad hominems.

C'mon 0nelilreb, you're better than this. Personal shots are the last bastion of a failed argument, you know that.

Dissapointing.
 
Advertisement

Back
Top