The Hunter Biden Thread

Looks like the US Ambassador to Italy may be implicated in the Burisma corruption. Of note: She is one of those implicated in FISA Gate for unmasking.

fy5kAFIdaJ.jpeg
The tentacles of the Bidens’ corrupt dealings are so far-reaching it will take years to fully unravel if there is actually an investigation as ought to be done.
 
The tentacles of the Bidens’ corrupt dealings are so far-reaching it will take years to fully unravel if there is actually an investigation as ought to be done.

He's too well connected for anything to ever come of this. They'll spend taxpayer funding on investigations and he'll walk. Joe will sacrifice his own son before taking the fall himself.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and dovervolz
He's too well connected for anything to ever come of this. They'll spend taxpayer funding on investigations and he'll walk. Joe will sacrifice his own son before taking the fall himself.
It's also just a wash.

In 2016, Hillary's scandal was potentially damaging to her, but it turns out Donald's crooked too. In 2020, Donald was tainted by scandal but Joe/Joe's son is crooked too, so it's a wash.

I think a good political rule to have is what each side says about the other is probably true, or at the very least along the right path.
 
He's too well connected for anything to ever come of this. They'll spend taxpayer funding on investigations and he'll walk. Joe will sacrifice his own son before taking the fall himself.
If you read the emails, you see Jim sweet-talking Hunter, literally trying to get him to hold it together so these deals can go through. That family used him up like currency and still rode him after he was a shell of a functional human. I pity him. It has a despicable feel to it.

30-11-1-1.jpg
 
It's also just a wash.

In 2016, Hillary's scandal was potentially damaging to her, but it turns out Donald's crooked too. In 2020, Donald was tainted by scandal but Joe/Joe's son is crooked too, so it's a wash.

I think a good political rule to have is what each side says about the other is probably true, or at the very least along the right path.
But that was BS - that’s actually one of the biggest scandals. The Obama admin made it up and spied on his campaign to try to make anything stick
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
But that was BS - that’s actually one of the biggest scandals. The Obama admin made it up and spied on his campaign to try to make anything stick
There was way too much smoke to totally write off Russiagate.

I'd be careful about embracing any kind of "the scandals of people I like politically are BS, but the scandals of people I don't like are totally true" thinking. All of those people live and work in a den of thieves.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tvolsfan
I find it interesting that the big media aren't reporting on the Rosen story of an ongoing investigation in to Hunter for money laundering. I get why they wouldn't want to report it but given they all have DOJ/FBI contacts you'd think at least one would have a source denying it if it weren't true. Silence from them lends confirmation?
 
I find it interesting that the big media aren't reporting on the Rosen story of an ongoing investigation in to Hunter for money laundering. I get why they wouldn't want to report it but given they all have DOJ/FBI contacts you'd think at least one would have a source denying it if it weren't true. Silence from them lends confirmation?
When you don't want people to know something, or take a closer look at something, it's better at first to just not say anything. You don't want to attract attention to it. If you come out and strongly deny something that not many people are talking about, then you attract more eyes to it.

When the heat is on, when people do start to take closer looks and demand answers, that's when you go into the "deny til you die" phase.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BeecherVol
I find it interesting that the big media aren't reporting on the Rosen story of an ongoing investigation in to Hunter for money laundering. I get why they wouldn't want to report it but given they all have DOJ/FBI contacts you'd think at least one would have a source denying it if it weren't true. Silence from them lends confirmation?
The way they view it, if its not in the news its not news to anybody.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
There was way too much smoke to totally write off Russiagate.

I'd be careful about embracing any kind of "the scandals of people I like politically are BS, but the scandals of people I don't like are totally true" thinking. All of those people live and work in a den of thieves.
You missed my point. The actual spying and coverup operation was much worse than anything they found on Trump.

How much do you think would’ve been publicly known if Hillary had won in ‘16?

Zero.

If you can’t acknowledge this, then you’re saying you still believe press coverage from 2-3 years ago that has since been proven false.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and NCFisher
You missed my point. The actual spying and coverup operation was much worse than anything they found on Trump.

How much do you think would’ve been publicly known if Hillary had won in ‘16?

Zero.

If you can’t acknowledge this, then you’re saying you still believe press coverage from 2-3 years ago that has since been proven false.
That's not what you seemed to be indicating at first. In the initial post of mine that you quoted, I said "...but it turns out Donald's crooked too." You responded "but that was BS." You think that the notion that Trump is crooked is BS?

I acknowledge that they are all crooked, and the most of the stuff that the sides allege about each other is probably true, or at least on the right track. I never have bought "one side is clean and one side is crooked" or "one side is waaay more crooked than the other" sentiments.
 
That's not what you seemed to be indicating at first. In the initial post of mine that you quoted, I said "...but it turns out Donald's crooked too." You responded "but that was BS." You think that the notion that Trump is crooked is BS?

I acknowledge that they are all crooked, and the most of the stuff that the sides allege about each other is probably true, or at least on the right track. I never have bought "one side is clean and one side is crooked" or "one side is waaay more crooked than the other" sentiments.
That specific “Russia collusion” thing was BS.

I was referring to that specific “conspiracy theory/ hoax” that the media played up for nearly 3 years.

It was BS. They tried to use it as a basis for impeachment. They failed.

Do you think it’s a coincidence the Ukraine thing started the day of / day after Mueller testimony ended?

Trump is likely not 100% clean. That doesn’t mean I could ever look the other way or ignore what was done to Trump because “they’re all crooked”.

When are people going to demand accountability?
 
If you read the emails, you see Jim sweet-talking Hunter, literally trying to get him to hold it together so these deals can go through. That family used him up like currency and still rode him after he was a shell of a functional human. I pity him. It has a despicable feel to it.

30-11-1-1.jpg

Beau was the favorite son and Hunter would do anything for Dad's approval.
 
Beau was the favorite son and Hunter would do anything for Dad's approval.
If that is accurate, this would lead me to believe there is no chance in hell Joe didn’t know exactly what Hunter did on every business venture / career change.

Because Hunter would want approval from “the Big Guy”.
 

Advertisement



Back
Top