The Hunter Biden Thread

The diary wasn't "fake" ... but that couple or O'Keefe could have easily forged those salacious passages and had the pages imbedded in that diary ... They both had motive, and clearly that couple saw it as a money making opportunity from the start. If that diary hadn't included salacious material when they found it, it damn sure would when they sold it.
The FBI had the diary. They verified it was Ashley Biden’s. Hence the charges against the dubious sh!tbag duo.

Why did the Biden DOJ & FBI let those 2 scumbags walk on a forgery charge?
 
The diary wasn't "fake" ... but that couple or O'Keefe could have easily forged those salacious passages and had the pages imbedded in that diary ... They both had motive, and clearly that couple saw it as a money making opportunity from the start. If that diary hadn't included salacious material when they found it, it damn sure would when they sold it.
Blah, blah blah. The same lame explanation was given to Hunter's laptop after it was proven authentic. At first it was Russian disinformation then the left rallied around it being altered and yet there is no proof any of the laptop or diary was altered. In fact most of the emails on Hunter's laptop are easily verified through other people on the email. You just jump on the "diary is altered" train because it is the only explanation that fits your narrative. Creepy Joe got his nickname for years of inappropriate behavior towards women and sniffing underage girls hair yet the left and MSM continually jump to his defense instead of admitting he is a creep. Joe taking "inappropriate showers" with his underage daughter would be par for the course considering what we know about his history with women and children.
 
Blah, blah blah. The same lame explanation was given to Hunter's laptop after it was proven authentic. At first it was Russian disinformation then the left rallied around it being altered and yet there is no proof any of the laptop or diary was altered. In fact most of the emails on Hunter's laptop are easily verified through other people on the email. You just jump on the "diary is altered" train because it is the only explanation that fits your narrative. Creepy Joe got his nickname for years of inappropriate behavior towards women and sniffing underage girls hair yet the left and MSM continually jump to his defense instead of admitting he is a creep. Joe taking "inappropriate showers" with his underage daughter would be par for the course considering what we know about his history with women and children.
The gang of 51 signed off and protected Hunter more than protecting the American people. That’s privilege
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeburst
The FBI had the diary. They verified it was Ashley Biden’s. Hence the charges against the dubious sh!tbag duo.

Why did the Biden DOJ & FBI let those 2 scumbags walk on a forgery charge?

No idea if it’s real or not, but what statute would they have charged them under?
 
If Trump is guilty of sex crimes with Epstein, by all means throw the book at him. The fact that nothing has come out about Epstein hooking him up with escorts and yet we have info Bill Gates was blackmailed is a little curious. For all the ways the deep state is trying to destroy Trump, this easiest way to get everyone to turn him would be to release evidence of Trump being in real cohorts with Epstein. The FBI has possession of the materials showing who was involved and to what extent.

Even Jamie Dimon lied about it. Fishy.
 
The same lame explanation was given to Hunter's laptop after it was proven authentic.
There was never any question over the diary being hers ... those passages in question have never been proven to be authentic ... and that couple is now in jail. That certainly does speak to their credibility here.
 
There was never any question over the diary being hers ... those passages in question have never been proven to be authentic ... and that couple is now in jail. That certainly does speak to their credibility here.

LOL .... and who proves it to be authentic .... the left-wing lunatics like you do of course.
You'd fine some lame excuse to be defensive for Biden's jock if it was all proven authentic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman
The FBI had the diary. They verified it was Ashley Biden’s. Hence the charges against the dubious sh!tbag duo.

Why did the Biden DOJ & FBI let those 2 scumbags walk on a forgery charge?
She acknowledged it was hers. That's not the question. The question is who wrote those salacious passages. That couple was obviously out to make a buck. They needed it to say something juicy... and so it did.
 
She acknowledged it was hers. That's not the question. The question is who wrote those salacious passages. That couple was obviously out to make a buck. They needed it to say something juicy... and so it did.
Has she denied the entires? Sit down interviews to clean the air of her childhood or even her own substance abuse? It’s a yes no…no need for a link.
 
Has she denied the entires? Sit down interviews to clean the air of her childhood or even her own substance abuse? It’s a yes no…no need for a link.
It wouldn't change anything if she did. People such as yourself would just call her a liar and believe what they want to believe.

Like I said, the people who found the diary are now convicted felons who are in prison. Project Veritas never had any credibility to begin with. That speaks for itself.
 
It wouldn't change anything if she did. People such as yourself would just call her a liar and believe what they want to believe.

Like I said, the people who found the diary are now convicted felons who are in prison. Project Veritas never had any credibility to begin with. That speaks for itself.

Have they been sentenced yet? Last I heard they were out on bond awaiting sentencing.
 
It wouldn't change anything if she did. People such as yourself would just call her a liar and believe what they want to believe.

Like I said, the people who found the diary are now convicted felons who are in prison. Project Veritas never had any credibility to begin with. That speaks for itself.
Really, you know me that well? So without her denying the claim we can assume her dad molested her. If she didn’t write those things it would be easy to verify. But that’s if she didn’t write those things.
 
Last edited:
Blah, blah blah. The same lame explanation was given to Hunter's laptop after it was proven authentic. At first it was Russian disinformation then the left rallied around it being altered and yet there is no proof any of the laptop or diary was altered. In fact most of the emails on Hunter's laptop are easily verified through other people on the email. You just jump on the "diary is altered" train because it is the only explanation that fits your narrative. Creepy Joe got his nickname for years of inappropriate behavior towards women and sniffing underage girls hair yet the left and MSM continually jump to his defense instead of admitting he is a creep. Joe taking "inappropriate showers" with his underage daughter would be par for the course considering what we know about his history with women and children.
He is literally the only person saying it's forged...
 
She acknowledged it was hers. That's not the question. The question is who wrote those salacious passages. That couple was obviously out to make a buck. They needed it to say something juicy... and so it did.
Yes. They authenticated it was hers. They did not authenticate the contents.

If the passages were forged - were the duo trafficking forgeries? Why did the FBI let them skate on it?
 
No idea if it’s real or not, but what statute would they have charged them under?
I won’t pretend to know. But I was under the impression trafficking forged documents was a no-no? Like a big one. Is that a Felony?

Why would they let them walk on that?
 
I won’t pretend to know. But I was under the impression trafficking forged documents was a no-no? Like a big one. Is that a Felony?

Why would they let them walk on that?

Would forging diary entries even be a crime? Not that I believe for a second that they were forged.
 
I won’t pretend to know. But I was under the impression trafficking forged documents was a no-no? Like a big one. Is that a Felony?

Why would they let them walk on that?
Forging an obligation or security, like a check, deed, or a contract.

Forging a diary? Doesn’t fit under 18 USC 471.
That doesn’t mean there isn’t another federal forgery statute, but I can’t find it.

I guess they could have charged them with some sort of theft by fraud with Project Veritas as the victim, but there are at least a dozen other reasons why they might not bring that charge, so the logic doesn’t really track.

There’s inconclusive evidence that it’s real. I don’t know why that isn’t sufficient.
 
Forging an obligation or security, like a check, deed, or a contract.

Forging a diary? Doesn’t fit under 18 USC 471.
That doesn’t mean there isn’t another federal forgery statute, but I can’t find it.

I guess they could have charged them with some sort of theft by fraud with Project Veritas as the victim, but there are at least a dozen other reasons why they might not bring that charge, so the logic doesn’t really track.

There’s inconclusive evidence that it’s real. I don’t know why that isn’t sufficient.
Forging something to then turn around and sell it? Did they cross state lines while doing it, does that even matter here? Idk.

My only point is this -

The FBI had that diary.
The FBI knows if there are inconsistencies.
 
Would forging diary entries even be a crime? Not that I believe for a second that they were forged.
I guess not?

If I forge a signed baseball card in Memphis and go sell it in St Louis - is that a crime? Idk.

The FBI knows if any of those pages/entries are inconsistent (paper, ink, handwriting, etc) with the others.
 
I guess not?

If I forge a signed baseball card in Memphis and go sell it in St Louis - is that a crime? Idk.

The FBI knows if any of those pages/entries are inconsistent (paper, ink, handwriting, etc) with the others.

If it is a valuable BB card, they want to tax it as unrealized capital gains. Just so pathetic.
 
Forging something to then turn around and sell it? Did they cross state lines while doing it, does that even matter here? Idk.

My only point is this -

The FBI had that diary.
The FBI knows if there are inconsistencies.
Not if there is not a statute.
Not if the two that plead aren’t the ones who forged it, which may or may not be further supported by the existence of a cooperation agreement.
Not if the prosecutor didn’t believe he could prove the case.
Not if the prosecutor didn’t believe he needed the charge.
Not if declining the charge was part of their cooperation agreement.
Not if the “victim” wasn’t taken in by the forgery, of which there is evidence.

The FBI may know, but the fact that they haven’t done anything that clues us in to what they know probably doesn’t indicate what they know.
 

Advertisement



Back
Top