BeecherVol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2008
- Messages
- 39,169
- Likes
- 14,459
Well sure.....that happens no matter what you do.....O heavy....D heavy....both good....both bad.......but “if” you want to try and gain....you probably going to at least try and “join them.”
You really think other coaches are watching these same teams year after year being good......and their thinking.....hey we need to be different than that?
I’m only explaining the “general” switch to more offense......and seemingly not as great defense.
coaches see who is winning. They understand what they used to do......isn’t what’s working right now.
If you look across the country most of the best teams (consistently) now are more offensive minded.....than maybe they used to be.
Also the teams which are testing those teams also seem to be more offensive minded. Many of the “new comers” are also good offensive teams.
Right now “if” you want to keep up you must be more offensive minded. You have to be able to score......or you will probably not be keeping up.......or even gaining on the competition.
Im not questioning whether coaches across the country should or shouldn't go heavy either way. Obviously you have to score more now to beat the best teams, but your not gonna do that if Bama, Clemson, OSU, UGA, OU (maybe a couple others) continue to out recruit you substantially on that side of the ball every year. They 're still gonna do whatever it is that you re both trying to do better you can.
I don't know who the "other" coaches are refusing to change to the heavy O strategy. Surely its not everyone but the 6 or so teams your champion is coming from every year. If thats the case there are a lot of coaches making the change that are losing 49-23 instead of 35-10.