,,,would be out here in Las Vegas with me if they thought they were doing more than guessing.
The fundamental mistake they make is assuming college football is linear. It isn't, particlualry with teams ranked between 20 and 50.
In addition to ignoring that NCSU has 1 5* (OL) and 4 4*s ON THE WHOLE TEAM, they incorrectly (stupidly) assume:
1. Hunter + CP < DRogers + no one
2. UT will have another UNPRECEDENTED bad running game, although the OLine returns 105 starts (#3 in FBS) and (quintessential) 3* Poole is replaced by 3 MUCH better and now more experienced athletes
3. Bray being 100% and a year older is irrelevant (although he's still projected the #1 or #2 QB in the 2014 NFL draft -- what do NFL scouts know compared to these "Experts"?)
4. Sal Sunseri's 2 shiny NC rings and a mostly upperclassmen Defense will have no effect
But I'm glad they continue to pile on -- the line has moved down 4 points (to 3.5) and I hope it keeps going. Maybe CDD can announce that the team bus has a flat tire and move it down another point or 2.
The fundamental mistake they make is assuming college football is linear. It isn't, particlualry with teams ranked between 20 and 50.
In addition to ignoring that NCSU has 1 5* (OL) and 4 4*s ON THE WHOLE TEAM, they incorrectly (stupidly) assume:
1. Hunter + CP < DRogers + no one
2. UT will have another UNPRECEDENTED bad running game, although the OLine returns 105 starts (#3 in FBS) and (quintessential) 3* Poole is replaced by 3 MUCH better and now more experienced athletes
3. Bray being 100% and a year older is irrelevant (although he's still projected the #1 or #2 QB in the 2014 NFL draft -- what do NFL scouts know compared to these "Experts"?)
4. Sal Sunseri's 2 shiny NC rings and a mostly upperclassmen Defense will have no effect
But I'm glad they continue to pile on -- the line has moved down 4 points (to 3.5) and I hope it keeps going. Maybe CDD can announce that the team bus has a flat tire and move it down another point or 2.