LSU-SIU
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2010
- Messages
- 14,428
- Likes
- 8,204
It’s not illegal to return him to face trial. That’s an insane argument.
There is no trial. Yes, something is insane here... you don't understand any of it.
He has already been determined to be an illegal under Law whether through immigration process or aea. Jesus. He is in FACT under Law an illegal alien, and the executive branch has designated him a member of a terrorist group as well.
His nine lives are spent.
Negative. If the Supreme Court wants a dog and pony show, it should be done. It’s in no way illegal to abide by a Supreme Court ruling
LSU lives in a world where he just takes the bits and pieces he wants, and applies them however he wants to apply, to whatever world view he has already created.
under the law the admin did not follow...No. These are simply observations. You are arguing because you are not getting what you want, you can either listen or don't.
I don't even know what you guys are arguing.... HE IS IN FACT AN ILLEGAL ALIEN UNDER LAW. There is no changing that.
under the law the admin did not follow...
It wasn't the media. I watched and read the media during the trial and it seemed very clear that he was guilty. The deciding factor on the verdict in my view was the competence of the opposing legal teams.The OJ situation was the 1st time I really notices how the media affected and pushed a certain narrative. They accused America of wanting him guilty because he was black, yet OJ, was loved by America, he was popular, he was in the naked gun movies. They pushed a lie and it ended up freeing a guy who killed his wife and another.
I am talking about public opinion. The media pushed this narrative that if he was convicted it was because he was a black man. I also followed it and I thought it didn't make any sense because of OJ's popularity. They continue to push this narrative that he was being attacked and on trial because he was black and that he would probably be convicted because he was black.It wasn't the media. I watched and read the media during the trial and it seemed very clear that he was guilty. The deciding factor on the verdict in my view was the competence of the opposing legal teams.
Stevie's out rousing the rabble.Stephen Miller Lists Consequences When Democrats Help ‘Criminal, Wife-Beating, Terrorist Illegal Aliens’
White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller appeared on Fox News Thursday and listed the consequences when Democrats help “criminal, wife-beating, terrorist illegal aliens.”
Maryland Democrat Sen. Chris Van Hollen traveled to San Salvador on Wednesday to protest alleged MS-13 member Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia’s deportation but was denied entry into the El Salvadoran mega-prison.
“I think it’s just emblematic of the fact that the Democrat Party has been thoroughly, completely radicalized. They are an open borders party. They’re a communist party. They’re a party that excuses violence and left-wing terrorism. They are a party that’s pulling at 21%,” Miller said during an appearance on “Hannity.”
![]()
Stephen Miller Lists Consequences When Democrats Help ‘Criminal, Wife-Beating, Terrorist Illegal Aliens’
Stephen Miller warned the Democrats on Fox News Thursday and broke down the consequences of aiding what he called criminal illegal aliens.dailycaller.com
Or is it possible he couldn’t return to El Salvador because of treats or gang violence from Bassario 13, be because he’s a leader in a rival gang?Right….for example people in Chicago often wear Bulls attire.
But people from El Salvador? Do you think he was just a bulls fan?
Or….do you think he’s dressing like an MS-13 member and hanging with MS-13 members because….he is an MS-13 member
Idk how you’re incapable of applying logic to this situation.