The cost of TPers and the birthers' obssession with this?

#2
#2
Didn't bother clicking, but something tells me you had no problem with the soldiers who refused to deploy becuase he/she didn't agree with the war.

And of course, all of this is the TP'ers fault. Makes sense.
 
#3
#3
volsforever27 said:
Didn't bother clicking, but something tells me you had no problem with the soldiers who refused to deploy becuase he/she didn't agree with the war.

And of course, all of this is the TP'ers fault. Makes sense.
Click to expand...


Of course I had a problem with that.

Although of course there is a qualitative difference between a soldier who is a conscientous objector and a loon trying to make a political point totally unrelated to the war by holding his own service hostage.
 
#10
#10
lawgator1 said:
Of course I had a problem with that.

Although of course there is a qualitative difference between a soldier who is a conscientous objector and a loon trying to make a political point totally unrelated to the war by holding his own service hostage.
Click to expand...

soldiers refusing to deploy to Iraq because they claimed it was an illegal war are not conscientious objectors - they are using a loophole to try to avoid service just like this a-hole.
 
#13
#13
Law, you should stop posting everything you think makes republicans look bad and stick to trying to convince us that Clemson is a better coaching job than Tennessee. At least that way, you'd be making people laugh.
 
#19
#19
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement





Back
Top