volsarelife1
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2017
- Messages
- 15,733
- Likes
- 20,732
I didn’t get that either. If the change of possession wasn’t a factor, then why mention it during the explanation? Maybe should have been Tennessee ball at the spot of change of possession, which was the endzone, therefore a touchback.After the change of possession? You don’t wipe out an INT on a penalty on the return
