Pride85
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2010
- Messages
- 5,554
- Likes
- 7,991
makeup for a certain personal foul on Chris Leak years ago
So, by your standards there should be a personal foul called on pretty much every play
What? That's what you comprehended from that? Solid reading skills.
When a DB shoves a WR after a play for running his mouth is that intent to hurt? O'Brien's actions were no different than Dallas Baker's in 2004 where we benefited from a flag.
What? That's what you comprehended from that? Solid reading skills.
When a DB shoves a WR after a play for running his mouth is that intent to hurt? O'Brien's actions were no different than Dallas Baker's in 2004 where we benefited from a flag.
Sorry my reading skills aren't up to your standards. No need to attack when someone doesn't agree with you. But if you think O'brien was trying to hurt him you don't have a clue.
Dallas Baker basically stuck his hand in a face mask in a punch like way. O'Brien put his hands on a guy sliding toward him at the end of a play. There may have been a slight shove, but it just wasn't that blatant IMO.
I thought it was a good no call. There a little pushing and shoving after the whistle on nearly every play. As long as there nothing over the top and no punches thrown... Its usually not called, especially in the last couple of minutes. I thought it was great when I saw it and didn't worry that it was going to draw a flag
Again your reading skills are failing you. That's my whole point, he wasn't trying to hurt him. I said that not every personal foul carries the intent to hurt connotation. You're arguing a point I never made. The OP I responded to said a personal foul has to have the intent to hurt and I pointed out that it doesnt.
Dont think thats a flop at all. I think he was reacting to the getting slung. It deff looks unnecessary and I believe he was like are you kidding me.