terrorist kills Minnesota lawmaker

#76
#76
The apparent hit list included abortion providers, clinics and Planned Parenthood, sources told The Post. Both of the Democrats he targeted were pro-choice.

Alright so mostly left wing organizations. So based off that this guy leans right, wonder how everyone here will spin that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NashVol11
#79
#79
Not sure if this was a typo or not but the reporting is currently indicating the opposite of pro choice views. Sounds like your typical abortion clinic bomber.
Good catch I didn't explain that correctly.... I assumed people read the articles about the abortion clinics being on his list...
He may be right leaning...I curious about 3 things tho..

1. The no kings flyers. Were they his or was he taking them down.
2. Why was Hortman so visually nervous about her vote at the press conference??
3. Why the timing of right after she voted against the DNC and with Trump was she attacked...??
On a side bar would you agree that if there were definitive Trump support in the manifesto that snippets would have leaked while not officially released?? Given they had no problem letting everyone know about the about clinics and others on the list..that show he may have a right wing bias.
 
#80
#80
Shhhh only Dems commit terrorism and violence! Just ask Fox News. The truth is both sides have bad apples.

I'm not sure if they've indicated what he's currently registered as either way but that's not really indicative of anything. What matters is the motivation and it seems clear a pretty big target (to be seen what the others were) was planned parenthood.
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85
#88
#88
His political affiliation isn't nearly as important to me as his reasoning for these extreme actions.
She had just voted against illegal alien welfare. She said she would pay for it in a press conference, I know she meant politically, I wonder if he was mad about that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: just bob
#89
#89
It also says a lot about you not condemning this act of evil instead focusing on the poster.
The original thread title and subsequent posts from the OP were pretty extreme. That sort of discourse needs an immediate call-out from someone. Think about it.
 
#90
#90
It also says a lot about you not condemning this act of evil instead focusing on the poster.
The original thread title and subsequent posts from the OP were pretty extreme. That sort of discourse needs an immediate call-out from someone. Think about it from an apolitical viewpoint
 
#91
#91
The original thread title and subsequent posts from the OP were pretty extreme. That sort of discourse needs an immediate call-out from someone. Think about it from an apolitical viewpoint

Do you think lawgator looks at things from a apolitical view?

If he knew this was a Trump supporter then he would've started the thread.

Regardless this type of cold blooded violence can't be tolerated. It was a sinister attack. Which is not often the case, it should be condemned by both sides. It should show the left you should not gin up and encourage these loons.
 
#95
#95
The very fact Tim Walz‘s state police have not released the manifesto tells you everything you need know.
If it was written by a conservative or republican, it would be wall to wall coverage and endless democrat press conferences
 
  • Like
Reactions: NEO
#96
#96
The very fact Tim Walz‘s state police have not released the manifesto tells you everything you need know.
If it was written by a conservative or republican, it would be wall to wall coverage and endless democrat press conferences
Stop. The guy hasn't even been caught yet.

The partisan crap in this country is going to end us
 
#97
#97
The very fact Tim Walz‘s state police have not released the manifesto tells you everything you need know.
If it was written by a conservative or republican, it would be wall to wall coverage and endless democrat press conferences

I would hope the FBI is involved.
 
  • Like
Reactions: chuckiepoo
#99
#99
The original thread title and subsequent posts from the OP were pretty extreme. That sort of discourse needs an immediate call-out from someone. Think about it from an apolitical viewpoint

Unfortunately, but the nature of the targets, it was political from the start. You can't think of this from an apolitical viewpoint from the start when the targets are politicians.

Now, there is a chance this is a non-political act of some sort... love triangle kind of thing, but a manifesto makes that very unlikely.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MemphisVol77

Advertisement



Back
Top