homefry20
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2010
- Messages
- 907
- Likes
- 0
You should.
No, it doesn't. Tennessee pays our football staff an absolute ton of money combined. Look at our facilities and the level of money it brings in. No one is going to start thinking we're a "basketball" school simply based on the basketball coach's salary.
It all depends on the situation. But it is easier to rebuild a basketball program than a football program due to the lesser amount of scholarship student-athletes. It just takes a couple recruiting classes as opposed to the numerous in football. This fact and it's easier to be successful in the SEC in basketball than football definitely support the "pay the football coach more money". But..... depending on the route we go we might have to pay more money for a basketball coach than Dooley's current salary.
I'm not saying anything about rebuilding or if winning is easier in basketball. I'm saying if we offer a basketball coach in excess of $2 million, no one will consider us a "basketball school" rather than a football school.
Butch Davis makes more than Roy Williams; is UNC a football school? No, it's a stupid argument.
I realize that not everyone makes rational decisions, but if I'm Jay Wright or Jamie Dixon and someone presents me with the opportunity to double my income, not have to live in Philadelphia/Pittsburgh anymore, and provide immensely better facilities and support, I don't know that I could say no.
I'll spot you the bucks and the facilities, but people need to get real about Knoxville vs. cities that spend $$ on, oh, I don't know, libraries, museums, restaurants, SIDEWALKS. The big spenders who shell out the cash for UT coaches should think about spending some of that money in Knoxville to make it a city people actually want to move to.
And, by the way, I live in Knoxville, so I'm not just blowing smoke. I'm a UT grad and a loyal fan, but this city has problems.