cncchris33
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2009
- Messages
- 35,184
- Likes
- 54,843
Pastner gets another year IMO
I think last year was his first time beating a ranked team? I might be wrong about that.
You would be correct. He beat St. Mary's in 2012-2013 and they were ranked in the coach's poll, but that doesn't really count since they weren't ranked in the AP. Last year he beat #5 Oklahoma State, #12 Louisville, #23 Gonzaga, #7 Louisville, and #18 SMU. Pastner is 5-17 against ranked teams. I believe Tyndall is 3-12?
You would be correct. He beat St. Mary's in 2012-2013 and they were ranked in the coach's poll, but that doesn't really count since they weren't ranked in the AP. Last year he beat #5 Oklahoma State, #12 Louisville, #23 Gonzaga, #7 Louisville, and #18 SMU. Pastner is 5-17 against ranked teams. I believe Tyndall is 3-12?
You would be correct. He beat St. Mary's in 2012-2013 and they were ranked in the coach's poll, but that doesn't really count since they weren't ranked in the AP. Last year he beat #5 Oklahoma State, #12 Louisville, #23 Gonzaga, #7 Louisville, and #18 SMU. Pastner is 5-17 against ranked teams. I believe Tyndall is 3-12?
And Tyndall has made it further in the NCAAT than Pastner ever has...
It may be facts, but Pastner has had every opportunity to succeed at Memphis. He won a lot of games just based off talent alone. Whenever his teams ran into disciplined teams that were just as talented as them, they faltered. Mainly, Pastner has struggled against the well coached teams (Virginia, Michigan State). The main reason Pastner has survived this long is because of the Memphis brand bringing in good recruits, a lot from inside the 240 loop, and by coaching in a poor conference (old CUSA and new American).
Pastner lasted because he can recruit and he runs a clean program. There was hope he could become a good coach with time, but it appears that experiment has run its course. Now, barring a huge turn around, its just about picking the best time to fire him. You can't after this year because it would cost too much, and because you're going to scare off other coaches when you fired the previous one after one "bad year". The consensus seems to be he'll be fired after next year if he underperforms. The only thing I'm worried about is him doing ok next year and making it hard to fire him.
I do think next year, Pastner will have enough talent to win enough games to get another year.
If it was up to me I'd say he needs to make a Sweet 16 next year to keep his job, which I don't see happening. The Lawsons are great, but our biggest issue is our backcourt, and both the Lawsons are forwards. Any success next year depends on Pookie and Crawford developing. That being said, it's not up to me, and even after next year he will have a pretty big buyout.
I could not believe Tom Bowen gave him that extension. That was an RC Johnson kind of move. Pastner may be a great ambassador for the university, but he just isn't cut to be a HC. I saw that by year 3 in his tenure.
I could not believe Tom Bowen gave him that extension. That was an RC Johnson kind of move. Pastner may be a great ambassador for the university, but he just isn't cut to be a HC. I saw that by year 3 in his tenure.
I guess Bowen was afraid Pastner would jet back to Arizona after the Cats wanted him to a member of it's coaching staff.