chuckiepoo
Beach Thong VOLleyball
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2020
- Messages
- 36,719
- Likes
- 98,619
Well, ironically, I am (just from my counseling background) one of those voices here who's always trying to urge fellow VFLs to slow their ride on preseason expectations. I just want my compadres to realize that pumping the preseason orange juice is actually pumping dopamine in the brain. It literally is a self-medicated high, with an inevitable downside.
For their own well being, I want them to understand that a dopamine high necessarily shuts down at the first news that contradicts or threatens their preseason expectations. Worse, when dopamine is cut off, your brain doesn't just settle back down to normal levels of satisfaction. It slides into a negative slump far worse than your normal feelings. [see: any Football Forum gameday thread] If you remember your first time being in love, and the roller-coaster ride of emotions that put you through every day... that's dopamine at work.
-----
That confessed, I do believe exactly what I posted, not as a prediction, but just logically from an analytical vantage. I don't anticipate it happening this year, if only because special freshmen are still freshmen. The trend lately is that older players win championships.
And obviously, the next three years could prove me to be terribly ignorant!
But maybe by then everyone will have forgotten.![]()
Well, there's two courses available to a head coach. You can try to keep the same great staff and grow old together, or you can prepare, invest in, and launch your assistants into successful careers, so that you can always attract the very best young assistants when you replace one.
I'm curious what y'all think about this? I have some thoughts:
- I know it doesn't matter who starts in Kim's system, but Zee will definitely be starting.
- Jaida Civil will be in the rotation.
- I don't think Coop starts at the PG spot.
- I do agree with their *early* preseason floor/ceiling projection. I haven't see the team in action, so I'm going E8 ceiling until I do.
Replace Wolfenbarger with Speerman and replace Prawl with Mia Pauldo/K.BoydI don’t like the wording.
Instead of Lineup and Bench, in Kim’s system I would say better wording would be the Orange lineup(who started) and Lady Blue lineup, who comes in after 90 seconds….ALA like the old Dean Smite Blue/White teams….
Kim will roll the rotation. Zero need to nail down starters.
I think Prawl and couple others might push for some of her minutes especially later in the season.Ruby should be in the "minutes up for grabs" category. She was very solid early in the season, sure, but she didn't hav a good conference slate, really. Poor defense analytics, in a group with Spear, Darby, Hollingshead, Boyd in terms of defensive points per play, yet unlike those four players, who were productiv offensively either because of their shooting, or their rebounding, Whitehorn neither rebounded nor scored on SEC defenses consistently. I figure she'll be in the starting 10 for sure, but she shoudn't be playing 20+ minutes on *this* roster unless she improves substantially. (say, if she starts nailing 3 pointers at an above average rate)
That was my impression (about Ruby's falloff in the SEC portion of the season) but it was just an impression. I'd never looked to see if the stats reflected that. I just noticed that I'd ceased to feel as confident that she was going to come through in a tight or pressure situation.Ruby should be in the "minutes up for grabs" category. She was very solid early in the season, sure, but she didn't hav a good conference slate, really. Poor defense analytics, in a group with Spear, Darby, Hollingshead, Boyd in terms of defensive points per play, yet unlike those four players, who were productiv offensively either because of their shooting, or their rebounding, Whitehorn neither rebounded nor scored on SEC defenses consistently. I figure she'll be in the starting 10 for sure, but she shoudn't be playing 20+ minutes on *this* roster unless she improves substantially. (say, if she starts nailing 3 pointers at an above average rate)
Ruby should be in the "minutes up for grabs" category. She was very solid early in the season, sure, but she didn't hav a good conference slate, really. Poor defense analytics, in a group with Spear, Darby, Hollingshead, Boyd in terms of defensive points per play, yet unlike those four players, who were productiv offensively either because of their shooting, or their rebounding, Whitehorn neither rebounded nor scored on SEC defenses consistently. I figure she'll be in the starting 10 for sure, but she shoudn't be playing 20+ minutes on *this* roster unless she improves substantially. (say, if she starts nailing 3 pointers at an above average rate)
That is what I said during the season. She has one goto move and once teams knew what that was she was easier to defend. I think she and Cooper were supposed to be the bell cows of their respective rotations. They were hardly ever on court at the same time.Ruby is a great player but once teams had her scouted she never adjusted at all. Her go to is to catch and go hard to the right. Once teams took that away she never developed a counter.